FLYFF V21 how awake works?

jarovart · 01/19/2025, 13:13

Hey,

I dont get it how this code works.

i want to change it to

My aim is:
- only positives awakes
-all awakes should get the same chance.

But after changing the code, I only get +1 awakes.

M¿dScientist · 01/19/2025, 17:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by jarovart

Hey,

I dont get it how this code works.

Spoiler

But after changing the code, I only get +1 awakes.

Code:

	const DWORD dwRandomProb = ::xRandom( MAX_RANDOMOPTION_PROB );

	short shPrevAdjValue = 0;
	for( ADJProbVec::const_iterator pos = vecAdjProb.begin(); pos != vecAdjProb.end(); ++pos )
	{
		if( dwRandomProb < pos->dwProb )
		{
			shAdjValue = bDecreaseAdjValue == true ? shPrevAdjValue : pos->shAdjValue;
		}

		if( shAdjValue != 0 )
		{
			break;
		}

		shPrevAdjValue = pos->shAdjValue;
	}

Code:

const DWORD		MAX_RANDOMOPTION_PROB		= 1000000000;

Maybe don't make the chances the same as MAX_RANDOMOPTION_PROB, and you'll pass the first iteration of the loop.

netHoxInc · 01/20/2025, 10:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by jarovart

Hey,

I dont get it how this code works.

Spoiler

AddDstParameter( "DST_STR" )
--{
SetAdjValueProb( -28, 100000 , 150000 , 50000 )
SetAdjValueProb( -25, 3038270 , 4557405 , 1519135 )
SetAdjValueProb( -22, 9524381 , 14286571 , 4762190 )
SetAdjValueProb( -19, 20572000 , 30857999 , 10285999 )
SetAdjValueProb( -16, 37701630 , 56552444 , 18850814 )
SetAdjValueProb( -13, 63346074 , 95019110 , 31673036 )
SetAdjValueProb( -10, 101762741 , 152644110 , 50881369 )
SetAdjValueProb( -7, 161466445 , 242199666 , 80733221 )
SetAdjValueProb( -4, 263744223 , 395616333 , 131872110 )
SetAdjValueProb( -1, 499999999 , 749999997 , 249999998 )
SetAdjValueProb( 1, 736255775 , 868127889 , 604383664 )
SetAdjValueProb( 4, 838533553 , 919266778 , 757800331 )
SetAdjValueProb( 7, 898237257 , 949118630 , 847355887 )
SetAdjValueProb( 10, 936653924 , 968326963 , 904980887 )
SetAdjValueProb( 13, 962298368 , 981149185 , 943447553 )
SetAdjValueProb( 16, 979427998 , 989714000 , 969141998 )
SetAdjValueProb( 19, 990475617 , 995237809 , 985713426 )
SetAdjValueProb( 22, 996961728 , 998480864 , 995442592 )
SetAdjValueProb( 25, 999900000 , 999950000 , 999850000 )
SetAdjValueProb( 28, 1000000000 , 1000000000 , 1000000000 )

--}

i want to change it to

Spoiler

SetAdjValueProb( 1, 100000000 , 100000000 , 100000000 )
SetAdjValueProb( 4, 100000000 , 100000000 , 100000000 )
SetAdjValueProb( 7, 100000000 , 100000000 , 100000000 )
SetAdjValueProb( 10, 100000000 , 100000000 , 100000000 )
SetAdjValueProb( 13, 100000000 , 100000000 , 100000000 )
SetAdjValueProb( 16, 100000000 , 100000000 , 100000000 )
SetAdjValueProb( 19, 100000000 , 100000000 , 100000000 )
SetAdjValueProb( 22, 100000000 , 100000000 , 100000000 )
SetAdjValueProb( 25, 100000000 , 100000000 , 100000000 )
SetAdjValueProb( 28, 100000000 , 100000000 , 100000000 )

My aim is:
- only positives awakes
-all awakes should get the same chance.

But after changing the code, I only get +1 awakes.

the last 3 params in

SetAdjValueProb( 28, 1000000000 , 1000000000 , 1000000000 )

should vary. Look at the examples beforehand, just offset them a little, in EQUAL distances, and you reach an EQUAL chance for each row to appear.

It appears that the actual 'chance' is the difference between each steps.

You only get the +1 awake as all have the effective same numbers, so the code will simply output the first you have listed, if you put the +28 STR on top of your listing it would be always +28, but as said, make equal steps for an equal chance.

Disclaimer: I have never worked with this code ever before, this is from pure visual code understanding and i might be wrong, but im confident im not.

Example:

SetAdjValueProb( 22, 80000000 , 83330000 , 86660000 )
SetAdjValueProb( 25, 90000000 , 93330000 , 96660000 )
SetAdjValueProb( 28, 100000000 , 103330000 , 106660000 )