[Question]

[Proto♫Death]

actually i'm using the sql sp4 to run my own server.

I was thinking of using mssql 2008...

what u think is better? and why?

[naruto820]

not compatible
only mssql 2000 with sp4 or mssql 2005.
also no versions of mysql compatible

[silkbotter]

lol?
08 works as well

but why choosing 08? the resource consumption of 2000 and 2008 is the same as windows 2000 and windows vista/7

stick to 2000. it's enough.




(why buying a Ferrari if there would be no asphalt roads? )

[T04STY]

why dont use the ferrari if its for free?

btw i think proto means mssql 2008, not myssql 2008 (which doesnt exist))

edit:
silk have you any sources that 2000 needs less ressources than 2008?

[Proto♫Death]

Originally Posted by T04STY

btw i think proto means mssql 2008, not myssql 2008 (which doesnt exist))

sorry my bad i mean mssql 2008

anyway..i'm glad to see more opinions about it

Originally Posted by silkbotter

lol?
(why buying a Ferrari if there would be no asphalt roads? )

Originally Posted by T04STY

why dont use the ferrari if its for free?

thanks for the similitude ALOL.

[pieter]

you can scan the databases for cross version compatability

aslong as the used commands/datafields from dekaron haven't been deprecated or changed you should be ok.

however, there's no real argument to use anything above 2005

i run on 2005 just for the replication to the backup dbserver 2000 works fine asswell asslong as u know what you're doing

[[DEV]AlphaOMEGA]

2005 all the way never really tried to go over it either