Quote:
Originally Posted by Surve
I've found PO to be pretty trash in terms of it's aimbot. Perhaps the updates have made it better, but I've lost confidence in it for legit play. Was a hassle to setup.
|
At first my CS2 cheat was a little bit less user friendly with less features & incomplete guides. Now though everything has been updated & tweaked plus many things have been added

I think your experience now would be entirely different
Make sure that you export your config once you get your settings perfect so you can import them later! There is no need to setup them up every time you cheat. PO does config saving securely via clipboard since it is a detection vector to save to disk. Simply paste your config string anywhere you'd like (e.g. private Discord server) and copy it + import it whenever
Quote:
Originally Posted by desglef
I truly couldn't find any real pros, I thought the entire program was kinda bad and very rough around the edges
|
Good thing you gave so many details so I know how I can improve my product
Quote:
Originally Posted by lort1234
Phantomoverlay just got their MW2 and MW3 beta cheat detected sadly. 
|
I do not agree with your use of

here
You should know, I am not ashamed about what just happened with COD. PO was the last popular provider standing against Ricochet. Ricochet had been implemented with a kernel driver since over 2 years ago & PO was one of the top providers when it was added. Then, over 2 years, PO got even bigger. Ricochet couldn't do anything against PO for more than 2 years other than a sloppy trick detection in their September 27 driver update
I assure you that this will never happen with CS2 but first let me say some things about COD since you brought that up
1. I found what was detected & fixed it
2. I am hardening against similar detections
3. I have implemented a security event trip system. Any time any concerning changes occur with MW2/MW3, injections will automatically shut off & I will get a notification. I will then review the changes & clear them before turning injections back on. This means PO COD will never auto update again but will be much more secure
4. I am coming back stronger than ever & plan to outlast competitors in the COD market once again
As for CS2,
1. VAC has no meaningful kernel-mode component right now at all
2. Even if they added one, I would still be the best option for CS2 cheating, just as I was for COD
3. I will get ahead on CS2 and implement the same bypassing and security measures as I have for COD. Keep in mind my CS2 cheat actually has a stronger bypass than COD so I will implement this bypass onto COD but COD has more security measures so I will implement them over here, including the trip. It's overkill for a user-mode based AC but w/e
4. Since my cheat is extremely humanized, especially with recommended settings, it would be very hard for the CS2 anti-cheat to do anything server sided to PO