PO or kernel aim

[CheatAdvisor]

not private mean not good usually

[zebleer]

Originally Posted by CheatAdvisor

not private mean not good usually

I disagree. How a cheat is sold says nothing about the quality of the methods used or the security of the product

If the private cheat/bypass used is pasted or even unique but lacking quality & security, there are going to be problems. Meanwhile there can be public cheats with excellent cheat/bypass & great security that outlast private cheats

Anti-cheat attention isn't everything. Not every detection is targeted in fact with a cheat market this large it's better for them to implement changes that hit several providers using certain methods than it is worth their time to target everyone

[lort1234]

I agree with Zebleer.

Since cs2 beta came out, more than 5 “private” external cheats have been publiced. It just shows the “private” cheating scene behaves and it’s more about hype and being exclusive than, it being about quality.

[leokratoss]

Originally Posted by zebleer

I disagree. How a cheat is sold says nothing about the quality of the methods used or the security of the product

If the private cheat/bypass used is pasted or even unique but lacking quality & security, there are going to be problems. Meanwhile there can be public cheats with excellent cheat/bypass & great security that outlast private cheats

Anti-cheat attention isn't everything. Not every detection is targeted in fact with a cheat market this large it's better for them to implement changes that hit several providers using certain methods than it is worth their time to target everyone

you said all, i used a lot of valorant private that right after turned out to be pasted and **** support, meanwhile some publics providers stand out for their rep