Detected features list?

[stardawggg]

Is there a detected feature list for public cheats or can someone provide me with detected features and me/somebody could make one for ‘features that have been recently detected’ so the people using public cheats can be aware as i know it’s not clear which features are safe to use.
For example, the glow feature ban wave. now i’m sure a lot of people stay away from glow

[Egal]

Just try and see what will get you banned, a prime account costs almost nothing

Just dont spin, dont use antiaim, dont put silent aim too high, dont use fake duck and dont use dt and you should be fine

csgo is the easiest game to cheat in, atleast in mm

[stardawggg]

me personally couldn’t agree more, but this thread wasn’t just targeted to me as some people can afford to buy the prime accounts to test features on as i know most people think iniuria is ok for mains when it’s a public cheat and they have features you can just enable without knowing the consequences, that’s why a list should be made so people can avoid losing accounts and tbh i don’t even know where to get one cheap with a high trust factor.. could you point in the right direction? as i wouldnt mind buying a few myself, cheers

[Aewbin]

Well, its not that easy since you can bypass the red flag.

But as example:

Glow gives red trust without bypass
Aimbot gives red trust without bypass
...

[RgBuddy]

Originally Posted by Aewbin

Well, its not that easy since you can bypass the red flag.

But as example:

Glow gives red trust without bypass
Aimbot gives red trust without bypass
...

calculating and writing to MouseDX and MouseDY, variables checked to compare / detect viewangle Aimbots that has been used since 2016, is not a “bypass”.
It’s common knowledge and just doing it the right way.

Most cheats still don’t do this as of last year and many still don’t today. Thus their Aimbots are basically detected.
If VAC/VACNet banned everything they detected, a lot of people and “developers” would be screwed.

The only reason these big providers ever even “fixed” their trust factor is because enough (already public) info was brought up.
So if you think most of these sites care, you’re wrong.

As for OP, you never know what you’re buying. So it depends per cheat.
A version of one tap hooked OverrideMouseInput for their Aimbot. With proper hooks this is fine. But they use/used that meme vac bypass, so their entire cheat lowers/lowered trust factor on injection.

As for iniuria, they go overboard and patch the OS to hide their threads and injection, for a user mode anti cheat(which is kinda pointless IMO) but they still have features that VACNet’s AI would probably flag.

VAC and VACNet are two different things.
VACNet is an AI. If your Aimbot is too consistent or snappy, the AI will lower your trust factor regardless of the cheat. And no adding those joke curves doesn’t help and isn’t randomization / humanization.

VAC would be the component flagging most Aimbots a few months ago for their viewangle Aimbots, their hooking, their injection, and disabling vac modules.
Even though these are all VAC though, not all instantly banned.
For example disabling the vac modules like 90% of cheats did last year flags your account and tanks your trust factor. They know you’re cheating but won’t ban you.

As a final note, trust factor is working perfectly as intended.

TLDR; Use logic, do your research, and pray your developer knows what his code does and actually does what he says it does.

[Aewbin]

Originally Posted by RgBuddy

calculating and writing to MouseDX and MouseDY, variables checked to compare / detect viewangle Aimbots that has been used since 2016, is not a “bypass”.
It’s common knowledge and just doing it the right way.[...]

They just checked if you changed your angles more then 40° in 1 tick.
The other **** got added in feb. 2022.

[RgBuddy]

Originally Posted by Aewbin

They just checked if you changed your angles more then 40° in 1 tick.
The other **** got added in feb. 2022.

Faceit serverside has done it for years.
The client had BEEN sending all of this data to servers, again, for years.
It took 5 seconds for Valve to add that check, and anybody who cared at all about security fixed it as soon as they saw Faceit using it.

There’s just a ton of stuff like this that is so obvious Valve could add in seconds or is already being used elsewhere. But again, most full-featured cheats really could care less.

They didn’t even care that their cheats were lowering trust factor and kept using the vac bypass meme that disabled modules.
MOST cheats did this a few years ago. Even though it obviously flagged everybody using it.
Because any level of reversing the actual anti cheat would show you that they know what you’re doing and tell their servers such.

None of these cheats cared until last year when enough people got upset and larger cheats started fixing it. And everybody just followed to stay up to date.

I can’t stress this enough but, in case you guys haven’t noticed, that’s a pretty low standard.
I am pretty confident that over 90% of cheat sites, not just in CSGO although it is the worst, have never touched the anti cheat(s) they say they bypass.
Many don’t even know what a lot of their code does.

If the dev doesn’t know what he’s selling how do you know what you’re buying

[Aewbin]

Originally Posted by RgBuddy

Faceit serverside has done it for years.
The client had BEEN sending all of this data to servers, again, for years.
It took 5 seconds for Valve to add that check, and anybody who cared at all about security fixed it as soon as they saw Faceit using it.

There’s just a ton of stuff like this that is so obvious Valve could add in seconds or is already being used elsewhere. But again, most full-featured cheats really could care less.

They didn’t even care that their cheats were lowering trust factor and kept using the vac bypass meme that disabled modules.
MOST cheats did this a few years ago. Even though it obviously flagged everybody using it.
Because any level of reversing the actual anti cheat would show you that they know what you’re doing and tell their servers such.

None of these cheats cared until last year when enough people got upset and larger cheats started fixing it. And everybody just followed to stay up to date.

I can’t stress this enough but, in case you guys haven’t noticed, that’s a pretty low standard.
I am pretty confident that over 90% of cheat sites, not just in CSGO although it is the worst, have never touched the anti cheat(s) they say they bypass.
Many don’t even know what a lot of their code does.

If the dev doesn’t know what he’s selling how do you know what you’re buying

Yes FaceIt did it for years, but valve didnt.

Disabling VAC worked back then..

[RgBuddy]

Originally Posted by Aewbin

Yes FaceIt did it for years, but valve didnt.

Disabling VAC worked back then..

Inhibiting VAC modules has always been reported back to their servers.
Whether it affected trust as much / at all back then doesn't matter.
If they wanted to they could've easily banned every user that has used it up to this point.

But they won't, as that's not the point of trust factor (which is working entirely as-intended).

More importantly, there's a dozen easier and more effective ways of hiding your process/threads from a low-priviledged usermode anti-cheat like VAC.
If I were a customer I wouldn't touch a cheat that's ever relied on that ****.
Though I'm not surprised so many pasted that garbage, the bar is pretty low.

[stardawggg]

so essientally VACNet is like some ai that can read how a cheaters movements are compared with a normal players movements. you say glow is a detected feature but i’ve been using it on iniuria for 5 games, still got green trust.. i’m so confused about it

and there should still be a list of stuff that gets you detected like what to do/what not to do as i know some cheat users will use public for main accounts. i’m not exactly an expert so if someone could create a little thread on how not to get banned when the ‘half ban’ happen because i know the majority are using features that get sent straight back to valve like you guys are saying and they have no idea about it.. not everyone has the time to study the ins and outs of vac.. a lot of you guys will talk about things a lot of us don’t understand, some people just wanna buy a cheat and play and maybe without the risk of getting banned if you get me.

[PenguinV3]

Originally Posted by stardawggg

so essientally VACNet is like some ai that can read how a cheaters movements are compared with a normal players movements. you say glow is a detected feature but i’ve been using it on iniuria for 5 games, still got green trust.. i’m so confused about it

and there should still be a list of stuff that gets you detected like what to do/what not to do as i know some cheat users will use public for main accounts. i’m not exactly an expert so if someone could create a little thread on how not to get banned when the ‘half ban’ happen because i know the majority are using features that get sent straight back to valve like you guys are saying and they have no idea about it.. not everyone has the time to study the ins and outs of vac.. a lot of you guys will talk about things a lot of us don’t understand, some people just wanna buy a cheat and play and maybe without the risk of getting banned if you get me.

Glow on iniuria doesnt give red trust i have seen multiple people using it who are still green trust and same for me.

[ragedwolf999]

Originally Posted by stardawggg

Is there a detected feature list for public cheats or can someone provide me with detected features and me/somebody could make one for ‘features that have been recently detected’ so the people using public cheats can be aware as i know it’s not clear which features are safe to use.
For example, the glow feature ban wave. now i’m sure a lot of people stay away from glow

Just use iniuria they have no Detected Features
Only way ur getting ban is if u rage but it’s a legit cheat tho so rageing would be pointless