nevermind

[Lays_Stax]

nevermind
i found asnwer

[Mistalakeboy]

rescan it

[Lays_Stax]

I deleted it righ away. I will download again and scan with more virus scanners. hold on
Heres with
"Online malware scan "
AntiVir Found nothing
ArcaVir Found nothing
Avast Found Win32:Crypto
AVG Antivirus Found nothing
BitDefender Found nothing
ClamAV Found nothing
Dr.Web Found nothing
F-Prot Antivirus Found Possibly a new variant of W32/Internet-Trojan-patched-based!Maximus
F-Secure Anti-Virus Found nothing
Fortinet Found nothing
Kaspersky Anti-Virus Found nothing
NOD32 Found nothing
Norman Virus Control Found nothing
VirusBuster Found nothing
VBA32 Found nothing


2nd scan with VirusTotal~
AntiVir 7.3.0.21 12.31.2006 no virus found
Authentium 4.93.8 12.30.2006 Possibly a new variant of W32/Internet-Trojan-patched-based!Maximus
Avast 4.7.892.0 12.30.2006 Win32:Crypto
AVG 386 12.31.2006 no virus found
BitDefender 7.2 12.31.2006 no virus found
CAT-QuickHeal 8.00 12.31.2006 no virus found
ClamAV devel-20060426 12.31.2006 no virus found
DrWeb 4.33 12.31.2006 no virus found
eSafe 7.0.14.0 12.31.2006 suspicious Trojan/Worm
eTrust-InoculateIT 23.73.102 12.30.2006 no virus found
eTrust-Vet 30.3.3289 12.29.2006 no virus found
Ewido 4.0 12.31.2006 no virus found
Fortinet 2.82.0.0 12.31.2006 suspicious
F-Prot 3.16f 12.30.2006 Possibly a new variant of W32/Internet-Trojan-patched-based!Maximus
F-Prot4 4.2.1.29 12.30.2006 W32/Internet-Trojan-patched-based!Maximus
Ikarus T3.1.0.27 12.31.2006 Trojan-PSW.Win32.Lmir.bi
Kaspersky 4.0.2.24 12.31.2006 no virus found
McAfee 4929 12.29.2006 no virus found
Microsoft 1.1904 12.31.2006 no virus found
NOD32v2 1949 12.30.2006 no virus found
Norman 5.80.02 12.31.2006 no virus found
Panda 9.0.0.4 12.31.2006 no virus found
Prevx1 V2 12.31.2006 no virus found
Sophos 4.13.0 12.30.2006 no virus found
Sunbelt 2.2.907.0 12.18.2006 VIPRE.Suspicious
TheHacker 6.0.3.139 12.29.2006 no virus found
UNA 1.83 12.29.2006 no virus found
VBA32 3.11.1 12.30.2006 no virus found
VirusBuster 4.3.19:9 12.31.2006 no virus found

[Lays_Stax]

Any info? :S
Aditional Information
File size: 494843 bytes
MD5: f7c228717c06c8c5195cab5c10fad94d
SHA1: bc03e35d1ef55f21b8d6573bf75dea73ec463bf4
packers: UPX
packers: UPX
packers: UPX, UPX
packers: UPX
packers: UPX, Aspack
Sunbelt info: VIPRE.Suspicious is a generic detection for potential threats that are deemed suspicious through heuristics.

[chickeneaterguy]

Uhhh....It works perfectly...

I scanned it and got the same results but that's kinda what you expect with cracked programs.

[Lays_Stax]

Well, I have heard it works perfectly but why are these virus's and etc etc in there? :S Thats what i am wondering. I am not saying he put them in there or nothing, they might just be from the packer's, but i am not sure how to tell all of that. Could a more experienced programmer help me out?

[howaboutno]

In a situation like this, I think you really need to decide whether or not you trust the source.

There's a certain futility about wondering whether your hacks have been hacked.

[shadowxx]

enjoy copart

[Maybe It's Maybelline]

Originally posted by Lays_Stax@Jan 1 2007, 00:00
Well, I have heard it works perfectly but why are these virus's and etc etc in there? :S Thats what i am wondering. I am not saying he put them in there or nothing, they might just be from the packer's, but i am not sure how to tell all of that. Could a more experienced programmer help me out?

You arent a programmer, so how dare you asking for a better one? Trusting webscanners who scans after Signatures is well... You know.. The only way you can trust it is by debugging or decompiling the tool, and then have a look for yourself. A tool can be already detected als malicious if its already using a special libary.

[a1blaster]

Originally posted by Lays_Stax@Dec 31 2006, 16:30
I trusted rattlz and i trust Dm2000, thats why i wont make any final decision's until a more inteligent programmer can confirm this. I received the file from Dm, and i scanned it. This is what the result's were!

AntiVir 7.3.0.21 12.31.2006 no virus found
Authentium 4.93.8 12.30.2006 Possibly a new variant of W32/Internet-Trojan-patched-based!Maximus
Avast 4.7.892.0 12.30.2006 Win32:Crypto
AVG 386 12.31.2006 no virus found
BitDefender 7.2 12.31.2006 no virus found
CAT-QuickHeal 8.00 12.31.2006 no virus found
ClamAV devel-20060426 12.31.2006 no virus found
DrWeb 4.33 12.31.2006 no virus found
eSafe 7.0.14.0 12.31.2006 suspicious Trojan/Worm
eTrust-InoculateIT 23.73.102 12.30.2006 no virus found
eTrust-Vet 30.3.3289 12.29.2006 no virus found
Ewido 4.0 12.31.2006 no virus found
Fortinet 2.82.0.0 12.31.2006 suspicious
F-Prot 3.16f 12.30.2006 Possibly a new variant of W32/Internet-Trojan-patched-based!Maximus
F-Prot4 4.2.1.29 12.30.2006 W32/Internet-Trojan-patched-based!Maximus
Ikarus T3.1.0.27 12.31.2006 Trojan-PSW.Win32.Lmir.bi
Kaspersky 4.0.2.24 12.31.2006 no virus found
McAfee 4929 12.29.2006 no virus found
Microsoft 1.1904 12.31.2006 no virus found
NOD32v2 1949 12.30.2006 no virus found
Norman 5.80.02 12.31.2006 no virus found
Panda 9.0.0.4 12.31.2006 no virus found
Prevx1 V2 12.31.2006 no virus found
Sophos 4.13.0 12.30.2006 no virus found
Sunbelt 2.2.907.0 12.18.2006 VIPRE.Suspicious
TheHacker 6.0.3.139 12.29.2006 no virus found
UNA 1.83 12.29.2006 no virus found
VBA32 3.11.1 12.30.2006 no virus found
VirusBuster 4.3.19:9 12.31.2006 no virus found

Wtf?

Just states that is, Possibly a new variant of W32/Internet-Trojan-patched-based!Maximus or VIPRE.Suspicious. Doestn't say that there is one. this is caused by the heuristics that some virus checkers use. All it means is that the code that was used looks like something. There is no definition for what was found. And just is the way that it was coded for the acces key that he uses. Plus cracking sometimes looks like virus to these checkers. Use a packet sniffer see what going out of your comp. Use your firewall. You use one don't you? If I test something it shows me that it's trying to acces the web, you just denie it the acces then. Plus i have active virus scanner running on my system. Do you? If you don't know how to make your system safe then i wouldn't be downloading anything off the web.

I've reported many threads for having keyloggers and virus's, they all get deleted. So to say that DM2000 or mr.ratzzl are bad is not even in my vocabulary. Read, educate yourself. Instead of being trigger happy to implicate somebody.

If your that worried then don't use it. Like i've stated in other posted don't just relie on the scaners. Use your own AV that you should have installed on your system. If that gets trigered then post something.

[Lays_Stax]

Originally posted by Maybe It's Maybelline+Jan 1 2007, 00:22--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Maybe It's Maybelline @ Jan 1 2007, 00:22)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--Lays_Stax@Jan 1 2007, 00:00
Well, I have heard it works perfectly but why are these virus's and etc etc in there? :S Thats what i am wondering. I am not saying he put them in there or nothing, they might just be from the packer's, but i am not sure how to tell all of that. Could a more experienced programmer help me out?

You arent a programmer, so how dare you asking for a better one? Trusting webscanners who scans after Signatures is well... You know.. The only way you can trust it is by debugging or decompiling the tool, and then have a look for yourself. A tool can be already detected als malicious if its already using a special libary. [/b][/quote]
Well i am a Small-very small programmer. I am VB6, if anyone counts that as a programmer. I am not sayign he is a hacker or any of that. I am just wondering why it would say all of this. I am int he first stage of learning programming.

[howaboutno]

If you aren't willing to trust the LVL3s and the Mods, you probably oughtn't botherwith the forum at all.

Maybelline has spoken.

#close plx

[Maybe It's Maybelline]

Originally posted by Lays_Stax+Jan 1 2007, 00:31--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Lays_Stax @ Jan 1 2007, 00:31)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

You arent a programmer, so how dare you asking for a better one? Trusting webscanners who scans after Signatures is well... You know.. The only way you can trust it is by debugging or decompiling the tool, and then have a look for yourself. A tool can be already detected als malicious if its already using a special libary.

Well i am a Small-very small programmer. I am VB6, if anyone counts that as a programmer. I am not sayign he is a hacker or any of that. I am just wondering why it would say all of this. I am int he first stage of learning programming. [/b][/quote]
Okay, question to you; How are trojans detected? Problems solved.
Alot of things can cause this, the hook or somewhat else. Either its because some mofo send that als malicious to norton or whatever, or the maker of ScriptVessel wasnt able to make a serious bypass in 10 minutes.

If you still dont trust it, unpack the UPX an Decompile it

[darkhobo]

i dont no who to root for or who to listen to lol

[Lays_Stax]

We are both on same side, but he is telling me bout it ^^ cuz i dont understand. I came here asking for help on this topic not to dis-agree with rattlz