Nvm

[hellrazer]

uhm first of all this will never work because tones of people have brother that play this game in hte same house and if u have a router they will technoaly have the same ip so there 4 it could b on 2 differnt computer and have hte same ip all because of a router so tq doesnt have a program that will sussufully work

[Milenkoski]

In my country they cant bann any 1 cuz our 1st internet provider has Dynamic IP adress when u disconect ur Conection and conect again u ll get other ip so that is inposible.

[smoothjonny]

Originally posted by Qonquer@Apr 17 2006, 19:44
There's many reasons this wouldn't be a good move and probably why they haven't done it before. Net cafés for instance usually use the same IP for all the PCs, and a lot of DB business is done with people who use net cafés. Home networks as well will generally use the same IP for the PCs using it, even some ISPs work with a VPN or NAT system that make all the users share the same IP. It would be a definate shot in the foot if they did this as multiple connections from the same IP does not mean that someone is multiclienting.

The above is exactly why the information in this original post is FALSE.

Also... how many college kids play online games? ...Millions... how many colleges have their students on a network? ...All of them... and how many of those networks use one IP address/ ghost IP address/ VPN/ etc...? ...All of them... and how much business does this jeopordize? ...For every 1 million college students, 7.99 million dollars (at least)... and how many companies will actively jeopordize 8 million dollars or more? ....None of them...


ok so that answers that question...

[nakisor]

I don't beleive this . Tq not release these things.. I mean these info (edit)

[Conquer-God]

Well I have been using multiclient from before the date of this thread (Apr 18 2006) and still have not been band.

[smoothjonny]

Lol such an old topic... from like april... we are still using multi-clients? ok... so...

dun dun dun another one bites the dust


#close please

[happypooface]

they just sent 100+ ppl from dragon server to jail GG -K FOR LATE WARNING

[stillnoob]

I'd like to see mult client patched. Mult client **** up the conquer ping (not to mention economy).

I know ppl who play all the time (24/7) with 10 chars logged. 5 mining 5 TGing.

So, what's the point of have 10 chars logged if you're not playing in real?

[ELITEN00B]

Originally posted by happypooface@Nov 15 2006, 03:15
they just sent 100+ ppl from dragon server to jail GG -K FOR LATE WARNING

LATE WARNING WTF this was posted over 7 months ago lay of the drugs man

ps they preety much have said that its cause of cotobo not multiclient for a reason behind dragons ppl being banned

[AzNShadoW]

friend of me got 24/7 30 chars logged in, its bullshit

[XtremeX-CO]

cant they simply check the machine name, and see the number of open connections from an IP with the same machine name?

[yokoyoko]

that's wat they do with botjail i suppose... but yes PLEASE CLOSE THIS THREAD this is retarded ppl are replying to a false alarm made more than half a year ago

[Mystery03]

i need to know if this is true i understand that it is hard for people to know if this is the truth or not but someone needs to figure this out thank you

[satanic666]

this same noob said this about 6 months ago and nothign happened same is gonna be with this one
just ignore him or ban him he dont know anythign about it
this is the 2nd or 3rd time hes posted this in the last year

[iceman19631]

Originally posted by sailboat22@Apr 18 2006, 02:21
well if they start banning people for multiclient conquers gonna close cuz 3/4 of the population will disapear. if this is true tq is full of mentally retarded people and either its true or the person who made this post doesnt like people using multiclient and is trying to scare us off of it

I simply agree with this. I use both a main system and a Laptop. That would be pretty phucked up if they did ban ppl for that very reason. :fedup: