Conquer Ai or CHROME?

[m7mdxlife]

Originally Posted by Korvacs

Really? Why is the thread entitled "The EPIC Proxy/Bot" if they don't have an opinion on how good their bot is compared to others, surely there's no need to put that if the decision is down to the user?

Seems more like hypocrisy than honest to me.

Simply because Chrome IS an epic bot.
What does Chrome being an epic bot have to do with the user decision about it compared to other bots?

"The EPIC Proxy/Bot" if they don't have an opinion on how good their bot is compared to others

Because its irrelevant

[InfamousNoone]

Originally Posted by m7mdxlife

Simply because Chrome IS an epic bot.
What does Chrome being an epic bot have to do with the user decision about it compared to other bots?

Because its irrelevant

So, looking up epic () the only two possible definitions that could be acceptable for the usage in the title are definitions 3, and 4.

I don't imagine they're referring to 4, because the only thing they would have to compare is file size, and that would be a bad thing (har har). So, that leaves us with 3, impressively great.

This kind of terminology can be only used in comparison to other work. How can something be impressive if you have nothing to compare it to?

(...)
tl;dr dictionary.com supports Korvacs argument.
I'm not saying Chrome isn't a good bot, just agreeing w/ Korvacs' analyzation of English used.

[m7mdxlife]

Originally Posted by InfamousNoone

So, looking up epic () the only two possible definitions that could be acceptable for the usage in the title are definitions 3, and 4.

I don't imagine they're referring to 4, because the only thing they would have to compare is file size, and that would be a bad thing (har har). So, that leaves us with 3, impressively great.

This kind of terminology can be only used in comparison to other work. How can something be impressive if you have nothing to compare it to?

(...)
tl;dr dictionary.com supports Korvacs argument.
I'm not saying Chrome isn't a good bot, just agreeing w/ Korvacs' analyzation of English used.

In this case you must excuse Chrome team for not looking up the word " epic " in dictionary.com before posting this thread.

Seriously, maybe we should all stop using slangs and start speaking old English for the sake of answering a simple question on an online forum.

[InfamousNoone]

Epic is still a term of comparison to other things similar to it. Even when you say, "hahah that's epic". You're comparing it to things that can be considered mediocre. There's no slang usage of epic that doesn't conform to the standard definition, sorry.

[jonny666]

Not true.

Yes you always compare something with something else, but you do not have to compare it to something similar for it to be epic. Something totally unique and one of a kind could be epic purely because of its awesomeness and even uniqueness regardless of if there was something similar to compare it to or not.

If chuck norris stood still in space vacuum and nothing else existed he would still be epic.

[jokerboy123]

Flame Warrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

- can we stuck to the thread and stop crapping abt epic bla bla..-

[InfamousNoone]

Originally Posted by jonny666

Not true.

Yes you always compare something with something else, but you do not have to compare it to something similar for it to be epic. Something totally unique and one of a kind could be epic purely because of its awesomeness and even uniqueness regardless of if there was something similar to compare it to or not.

If chuck norris stood still in space vacuum and nothing else existed he would still be epic.

In your first paragraph, you're comparing it to things that are unalike in the sense that nothing like it has ever existed there by making it epic.
In the second paragraph, you're comparing Chuck Norris to the absence of other entities/objects thereby making him epic.

Yeaaah.... nt, nt.

[calibur2244]

Originally Posted by Korvacs

Really? Why is the thread entitled "The EPIC Proxy/Bot" if they don't have an opinion on how good their bot is compared to others, surely there's no need to put that if the decision is down to the user?

Seems more like hypocrisy than honest to me.

Well the bot itself seems pretty Epic so... why not write that in the description, but still... they dont claim that their bot is better than the other one's, and that does seem pretty honest to me. Instead of writing down its up's and pointing out CoAI / CoGen's down's they simply just say that its up to the user to decide which is best... o:?

[jonny666]

Originally Posted by InfamousNoone

In your first paragraph, you're comparing it to things that are unalike in the sense that nothing like it has ever existed there by making it epic.
In the second paragraph, you're comparing Chuck Norris to the absence of other entities/objects thereby making him epic.

Yeaaah.... nt, nt.

No, in both the first and the second paragraph I state that something can be epic regardless of anything else that may or may not exist which is above(but can include) a statement that says something is epic just because of a lack of other things to compare it to.

[IAmHawtness]

Jonny <3

[hunterman01]

Totally non biased, but i have tried both chrome and ai. In my opinion i believe ai is better then chrome. Chrome has a really really laggy ai. I have been able to stay logged in on ai alot better then on chrome. Alot more accounts on ai then chrome over all in my opinion ai is better

[xswagx]

COAI or CHROME is better for automated lvler? And hunting?

[I don't have a username]

I can't say what's better as I have only tried ConquerAI, so that would be what I'd say.

[m7mdxlife]

Originally Posted by xswagx

COAI or CHROME is better for automated lvler? And hunting?

Chrome.
I tested both and Chrome is for leveling/hunting. AI is for mining

[xswagx]

Is it also good at hunting? I get confused when I try to download it. Not very clear instructions..someone care to guide me?