QOProxy MY version.

MrGenious · 12/07/2007, 21:39

Ok it's like this 3-4 years ago I got Qonquers proxy the QOProxy. And since then I have added a bunch of stuff and it now has basicly EVERYTHING.
Labb lvler for archers/as/bas/waterdevils in metzone/ bluemouse quest/ and waaaaay more stuff. Things you can't imagine. Even a path command where u add ur cords urself in a .txt file like

252,562
532,16
615,63

and so on then you name the .txt file whatever you want and inside co you type, the prefix # or / doesnt matter I use the / cause it gets blocked by co client itself. Anyway you type /to <Name of file> and it will jump thoose cords.

Soooo many things.

What I want is to release it but I don't want to release the source code... Why? I don't want noobs to get it I want only thoose that can even crack .exe files to get it.
And I will give the source to asblaster so no one has to worry about any backdoors or anything.

Now since I don't know how to make a .exe file out of .class or.java files so I will need help to do that so it becomes like v3nom or nproxy, that hard to open up I mean.

So before I will release it someone gotta help me make it hard to open.

By the way it even has teleport, 2 versions of it. one that dcs and one that doesn't so everyone that already have the dc on but is interested in how to make it NON dcing has the chance here.

Real~Death · 12/07/2007, 21:52

sounds like a nice proxy,wish i could get the source-im still trying to repair the ORIGINAL QOPROXY pain in the *** btw

*M* · 12/07/2007, 21:59

Here ya go:

Drag your .jar file in there and it will make an exe from it.

MrGenious · 12/07/2007, 22:02

That is it O_o? is that all to make it hard to view for noobs? I guess the .exe will be out soon after asblasters approval or yours if ur good at checking for backdoors/viruses and stuff. Doesn't matter by who.

*M* · 12/07/2007, 22:08

You can use an exe compressor to make it more difficult. Something like aspack or morphine.

MrGenious · 12/07/2007, 22:29

allright.

*M* · 12/07/2007, 23:02

By the way, does Java have a function like WriteProcessMemory?

MrGenious · 12/08/2007, 00:27

why? and yes it does.

Edit: Im having some trouble making a jar file of the QOProxy.class :/ It doesn't want to run? It's a executeable jar file im making. Is it supposed to not run?

This is how im doing it in cmd.
1. C:\>cd \mywork
2. C:\mywork> path c:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.5.0_09\bin;%path%
3. classes already compiled so don't have to do that again.
4. C:\mywork> echo Main-Class: QOProxy >manifest.txt
5. C:\mywork> jar cvfm QOProxy.jar manifest.txt QOProxy.class
6. I try to open it by doubleclicking on the QOProxy.jar, nope doesn't work get a error saying "Could not find the main class. Program will exit."
and I try to run it in cmd promt typing java -jar QOProxy.jar and then I get a error like this "Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: QOProxy"

whats going on :S?

*M* · 12/08/2007, 08:00

Does your compiler not have the option to compile straight into a jar?

MrGenious · 12/08/2007, 14:04

Yes it does, through jdk, but the result would be the same.

GhostRider · 12/08/2007, 15:04

Wow.. Thats gotta be very nice..
But the problem is.. i think you shouldnt release it to public.
The reason for this is cause if it will go public some of the things will be fixed, All those quests and stuff will become crowded and it will **** up co..
IMO you should do the same as SV a while ago, Or set a pw on it and only the ones who you think who qualify for it will get it..
Think about it.. u want everyone teleporting? Or doing the bm quest?

This is just my 2 cents.. It will be nice anyway.

Greetz

MrGenious · 12/08/2007, 15:14

Im quitting I wouldn't care.

GhostRider · 12/08/2007, 15:38

When are you planning to release it?

MrGenious · 12/08/2007, 17:44

When I've packed it, and I can't figure out how to pack it to a .jar correctly.

~~Vert1go~~ · 12/08/2007, 19:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrGenious

When I've packed it, and I can't figure out how to pack it to a .jar correctly.

Can you not just use the jdk to compile it directly to an executable (.exe) this would make it easier to use surely? And if you want the final production secure you could TRY using a/the UPX packer... but that would give some false positives when people scan it.

Where is a1 on this? He can verify the backdoors and such have been fully removed but I can guarantee everyone who sees this will request a 'full' virus scan from virus total or something similar