[Release][C++]COEncryption.dll

[tanelipe]

I wrote it yesterday after you created this thread, lol. I'm still missing the KeyExchange (KeyExchange meaning the class that wraps all these other classes, same as in the C# implementation) part, mainly because I'm lazy/didn't have interest to finish/do it. Other than it should be working 'perfectly'. All I now need is a proxy :P

[Nullable]

Originally Posted by tanelipe

I wrote it yesterday after you created this thread, lol. I'm still missing the KeyExchange (KeyExchange meaning the class that wraps all these other classes, same as in the C# implementation) part, mainly because I'm lazy/didn't have interest to finish/do it. Other than it should be working 'perfectly'. All I now need is a proxy :P

Shouldn't take you a lot, it's just a matter of combining everything together, still writing the reply lol(my cryptographic knowledge is sort of limited )

[hunterman01]

Originally Posted by tanelipe

I'm not really into doing it, it's pain in the **** in C# already.

Can you say Agreed to that comment

Im in the process of writing my own source which right now the part im at is writing blowfish.... which blows fish lmao

[ImmuneOne]

Originally Posted by hunterman01

Can you say Agreed to that comment

Im in the process of writing my own source which right now the part im at is writing blowfish.... which blows fish lmao

You should use OpenSSL

[hunterman01]

Originally Posted by ImmuneOne

You should use OpenSSL

**** i never thought about that would save me alot of time

[ImmuneOne]

Originally Posted by hunterman01

**** i never thought about that would save me alot of time

I presumed you were good enough to code your own wrapper, my mistake.
Anyhow, if you failed to do it included with OpenSSL, then please stop trying.

[ImFlamedCOD]

Originally Posted by ImmuneOne

You should use OpenSSL

Managed Open SSL also has alot of usless and not used **** in it. So either way it works the same but just saying you do not the full capabilities of opensll wrapper.

[ImmuneOne]

Originally Posted by ImFlamedCOD

Managed Open SSL also has alot of usless and not used **** in it. So either way it works the same but just saying you do not the full capabilities of opensll wrapper.

That's why coding your own BF Wrapper is the best option.

[hunterman01]

Maybe but OpenSLL is the quickest way

[© Haydz]

Originally Posted by hunterman01

Maybe but OpenSLL is the quickest way

I personally think importing directly from libeay32 is quicker than using the managed OpenSSL library

[Nullable]

Updated to Revision 3, fixed bugs in code, tested main encryption class and working 100%

[tanelipe]

I have the updated versions of these if you want them. There shouldn't be any errors in this new version. The original version I posted was 'full' of bugs.

[Nullable]

Originally Posted by tanelipe

I have the updated versions of these if you want them. There shouldn't be any errors in this new version. The original version I posted was 'full' of bugs.

No, but thanks for the offer i am already debugging and i will post updates as i fix up existing bugs