Discussion on [(Awesome)RELEASE] CoEmuv2.Nano(5095) Source Code within the CO2 PServer Guides & Releases forum part of the CO2 Private Server category.
Just interested if anyone is interested and would get benefit if I am to release my "Previous Map" function.
For those not in the know, it allows you to go back to the last map you were on, like you go to Market, you talk to Mark. Controller and she sends you to the last map you were on (instead of it always being Twin City).
edit: now that I think about it, it can be used to kick you off a map that you aren't supposed to be on when you reconnect. ._.
If you knew ANYTHING of the CO community you would understand what a negative effect this has on the entire community. Sure you won't understand. That's because i bet you've never Clicked "New Project" in C#? Its just Open Existing.
Haydz, Ultimatum.
I don't see what big of a problem this is.
It didn't cause any hugely negative effect on the community, hell, most servers are STILL 5017, I see very few 5095 servers yet.
Sure, the source was released and I freely distributed the new encryptions, but so did Sparkie, minus a few of the steps, and a little editing.
Okay, fair enough, i may have exaggerated abit there, the section of the community who are still interested in CO and are worth their salt.
Quote:
Originally Posted by andyd123
Haydz, Ultimatum.
I don't see what big of a problem this is.
It didn't cause any hugely negative effect on the community, hell, most servers are STILL 5017, I see very few 5095 servers yet.
Sure, the source was released and I freely distributed the new encryptions, but so did Sparkie, minus a few of the steps, and a little editing.
You just watch hundreds spring up, and if for a second you think they're going to give you credits, your seriously mistaken. I already know of many people who are using your source purely for the encryption. I may not have cracked the Crypto completely myself but i sure as hell had nothing done for me other than the info i received from sparkie over msn and the epvp thread. The fact that people have just being given it is just pathetic.
Okay, fair enough, i may have exaggerated abit there, the section of the community worth their salt who can actually create a server from scratch.
You just watch hundreds spring up, and if for a second you think they're going to give you credits, your seriously mistaken. I already know of many people who are using your source purely for the encryption. I may not have cracked the Crypto completely myself but i sure as hell had nothing done for me other than the info i received from sparkie over msn and the epvp thread. The fact that people are just being given it is just pathetic.
People were given the original conquer encryption.
People have been given the warlords encryption,
the EU encryption. Yet you only get mad because of Co's newest encryption. The idea behind private servers is that things need to move forward consistently. Look at ArcEmu(for wow) which is a totally open-source, completely updated server. If you want to talk about too much given away for free, I'd look at that, not CoEmu.
Therefore you don't see the bigger picture here. Fact is andy released a source that as the new encryption 'Working'. Look at the total downloads of it... Its was basically given to them, no work just given.
Quote:
Originally Posted by andyd123
Haydz, Ultimatum.
I don't see what big of a problem this is.
It didn't cause any hugely negative effect on the community, hell, most servers are STILL 5017, I see very few 5095 servers yet.
Sure, the source was released and I freely distributed the new encryptions, but so did Sparkie, minus a few of the steps, and a little editing.
Sparkie released it in a entirely diffent way. He distributed it so the end user had to work to get past patch 5017. So sparkie didn't do the same. You basically just gave them it. With nothing hardcore to do LOL. Nice all they need to do is c&p from lotf and they are done ... Sparkie may of helped me during the encryption cracking stage. However me and haydz did everything else. I just think it was uncalled for, therefore you lost my respect.
People were given the original conquer encryption.
People have been given the warlords encryption,
the EU encryption. Yet you only get mad because of Co's newest encryption. The idea behind private servers is that things need to move forward consistently. Look at ArcEmu(for wow) which is a totally open-source, completely updated server. If you want to talk about too much given away for free, I'd look at that, not CoEmu.
The Whole Of said CO community must have missed that point. And i quote Korvacs:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Korvacs;
Cant be bothered with the community any more, mainly cos its dead, hardly anyone shares things, and hardly anyone is greatful when they do receive things, and the games **** lol so yeah.
As i said im not too fussed about it anymore, i was waiting for an excuse to quit developing this dead end game. My prayer has been answered. Im moving on to bigger and better things (I Hope LOL)
Therefore you don't see the bigger picture here. Fact is andy released a source that as the new encryption 'Working'. Look at the total downloads of it... Its was basically given to them, no work just given.
Sparkie released it in a entirely diffent way. He distributed it so the end user had to work to get past patch 5017. So sparkie didn't do the same. You basically just gave them it. With nothing hardcore to do LOL. Nice all they need to do is c&p from lotf and they are done ... Sparkie may of helped me during the encryption cracking stage. However me and haydz did everything else. I just think it was uncalled for, therefore you lost my respect.
Are you kidding?
Sparkie literally released EVERYTHING people needed, you put it all into one file, change some NUMBERS, and you're good to go.
You'll have to do more work getting the encryption I released to work with LOTF, which is why you haven't seen ANYONE do it so far, because it's a waste of time.
This wasn't uncalled for, if you had had input into the decision, sure, maybe then it was uncalled for, but what I do with what I created cannot be labeled 'uncalled for' because it technically is doing nothing wrong.
CoEmuv2.Nano(5095) Problem help pls 06/07/2017 - CO2 Private Server - 14 Replies I Have a Problem Can help my pls
http://www.imgbox.de/users/public/images/w31636w1 19.jpg