[Release]ConquerLoader v2

[Nullable]

Originally Posted by Basser

This is great.
Do you use detouring?

Yes.
v1 used WPM though.

UPDATE

Check main post for details.

[zblowfish]

Nullable you think you can do a version of this that hides your IP? Just incase some one wants to hack you it's encrypted >.<

[Nullable]

Originally Posted by zblowfish

Nullable you think you can do a version of this that hides your IP? Just incase some one wants to hack you it's encrypted >.<

It could be done, but whoever connects to the server will be able to read the server's IP no matter what you do. It's just how things work.

[zblowfish]

Originally Posted by Nullable

It could be done, but whoever connects to the server will be able to read the server's IP no matter what you do. It's just how things work.

Aw **** >.< well could yeah do it any ways xD?

[Nullable]

Originally Posted by zblowfish

Aw **** >.< well could yeah do it any ways xD?

I can't see the benefit behind it therefore no, I won't do it..

[Kiyono]

Could you make a version that changes the servername ingame (top left corner)?

[Nullable]

Originally Posted by Kiyono

Could you make a version that changes the servername ingame (top left corner)?

I can't because it will not be patch-independent (which is my aim for this program honestly, a patch-independent loader which users can customize).

[Kiyono]

Oh, I had the weird idea servernames weren't patch depended.

[Basser]

For some reason this is not working for me.
It starts CO, but it simply doesn't connect.
Patch 5250 - uses the official patch.
Running windows 7 - 64 bit, running the application as an Administrator.

[Nullable]

Originally Posted by Basser

For some reason this is not working for me.
It starts CO, but it simply doesn't connect.
Patch 5250 - uses the official patch.
Running windows 7 - 64 bit, running the application as an Administrator.

Actually I am using an official install, patch 5250. Also a win 7 x64, and I don't have any single issue with it.

Are you sure you're using the correct port? If so, contact me @

[Nullable]

Released v4 for anyone who has problems with WINXP, check main post.

[MonstersAbroad]

Rev 4 - Working perfectly for me. XP SP3

[Basser]

Nullable, I hope you remember working on fixing the loader.
And the problem was the PasswordSeed, of course this means the loader was working perfectly, but yet I believe that for those that need the loader for patches before the PasswordSeed packet got used, it would be handy if there was an switch/release/option whatever, to make it skip the PasswordSeed, that would make it even better than it is right now, however do not feel forced to do anything, it's an suggestion, wouldn't even help myself, maybe others.

~Bas.

[Nullable]

Let me explain to you what you're trying to suggest, remove all the password encryption routine in the client and edit it to send login request directly on connection to auth server, don't you think this is just too much for a simple 8 bytes-sized packet? Let alone it is not a simple task (and I am not too fluent with assembly yet to do it).

[Basser]

Originally Posted by Nullable

Let me explain to you what you're trying to suggest, remove all the password encryption routine in the client and edit it to send login request directly on connection to auth server, don't you think this is just too much for a simple 8 bytes-sized packet? Let alone it is not a simple task (and I am not too fluent with assembly yet to do it).

What I'm trying to suggest is, waiting for the password seed makes it patch dependent, giving the option to leave it out, makes it patch independent, or at least your 1 step closer.