[Part1]C# - Introducing (Windows Form)

[Nullable]

Originally Posted by TheGuyWithTheCodes

then you maybe should look up at my old accounts.
I released about 3 sources.
+ im on my 4th.

Fourth account .. Wonder why?

Originally Posted by TheGuyWithTheCodes

This source is a LOTf (yes). Im working on fixing the sockets & sql problems.

Not commenting.

Originally Posted by TheGuyWithTheCodes

This source is away better build up and easier to use.

Same.

Originally Posted by TheGuyWithTheCodes

Also for the npc's are putted in region and are changed from CurrentNPC to NN, NPC or ThisNPC.

How is this a feature?!

Originally Posted by TheGuyWithTheCodes

Do i set it up like other LOTF?
No is very very different.
This source is not build up in config.ini.
Is at source way.

Yay!
The interwebs changed to be a place for wannabees, just to release their 'features'..

[TheGuyWithTheCodes]

Originally Posted by Nullable

Fourth account .. Wonder why?

Not commenting.

Same.

How is this a feature?!

Yay!
The interwebs changed to be a place for wannabees, just to release their 'features'..

lol nullable.
what i wrote, is what ive done yet.
Ive changed some packets now and the npc scripts are totally changed.
with the packet send, so is shorter.
And there is features that im working on.
Deathmatch with points, tournament points, kill ratio, team tournaments, class pk's and much more.
so yea features are coming.
also i wasn't talk about my 4th account.
I have only been on 3 accounts.
grillmad, zTREME and now this.
The only account thats banned is zTREME.
And is because it got 3 infractions, 1 for off topic.
1 for posting a racism thread (refered to lol code as how egypt talked in CO)
and the last for posting an advertisement for a forum without linkback.
so really i wasn't banned for flaming or being an ass.

@s.bat
why should i copy.
and you say my definations are wrong?

You will say that this is wrong:

private:
For only same type

protected:
Derived or same types only
internal:
Same assembly(+external as long is same ass.)

protected internal
Combination of protected or internal. Not between them.

public
Any type, dosn't need to be same type, assymbly etc.

just because i didnt give an example on it, dosn't mean is wrong.

[s.bat]

Originally Posted by TheGuyWithTheCodes

@s.bat
why should i copy.
and you say my definations are wrong?

You will say that this is wrong:

just because i didnt give an example on it, dosn't mean is wrong.

Your lack of comprehension amuses me. If you'll reread my posts, nowhere did I state that you were incorrect, but rather I noted on your ability or lack thereof, to form complete thoughts anywhere near the level of coherency necessary to teach such a simple lesson (in accessibility levels, not the more complex encapsulation; that has yet to be explicated).

[TheGuyWithTheCodes]

Originally Posted by s.bat

Your lack of comprehension amuses me. If you'll reread my posts, nowhere did I state that you were incorrect, but rather I noted on your ability or lack thereof, to form complete thoughts anywhere near the level of coherency necessary to teach such a simple lesson (in accessibility levels, not the more complex encapsulation; that has yet to be explicated).

Clear from all forms of intelligence? How's about letting someone with knowledge in the subject deter others from reading your post.

..

[s.bat]

Originally Posted by TheGuyWithTheCodes

Originally Posted by s.bat

Nowhere did I state that you were incorrect.

I did say that someone more prepared should devoid your post by explaining the subject matter in a way that is comprehendable to those who aren't steaming with a repulsive incapacity to construct legible statements.

[TheGuyWithTheCodes]

Originally Posted by s.bat

.

ur telling me, i dont know what im talking about.
well, why did i write it then?
whatever, lets stop spam this thread.

[s.bat]

Originally Posted by TheGuyWithTheCodes

ur telling me, i dont know what im talking about.
well, why did i write it then?
whatever, lets stop spam this thread.

I (personally) do not believe that your post was helpful because it was extremely difficult to decipher, and lacking in information. I could have gained a more detailed and easily understandable explanation of accessibility levels by searching the web. The reason that a guide was suggested was to promote the use of examples in a reply.

[TheGuyWithTheCodes]

i wasn't about to give help.
They were discuss about if private was improtant or not.
Then i just gave a quick info on it.

[SigmaD]

Originally Posted by TheGuyWithTheCodes

private:
For only same type

That doesn't really help much, specially if the person reading it has no previous programming experience.

[ChingChong23]

Originally Posted by SigmaD

That doesn't really help much, specially if the person reading it has no previous programming experience.

that does not tell much, even if you do have programming exp

[TheGuyWithTheCodes]

and they both have, so thats why?
i wasn't supposed a guide and examples in a thread.

@chingchong
why do you write exactly the same as him?

[DarkMessiah]

Originally Posted by TheGuyWithTheCodes

and they both have, so thats why?
i wasn't supposed a guide and examples in a thread.

@chingchong
why do you write exactly the same as him?

he didn't write the same thing as him, he wrote a clarification.

sigma: that would confuse anyone who isn't experienced in coding
ching: no, that would confuse anyone. period.

[Ian*]

This tutorial is more like common sense to me.
All he pretty much said in a much simpler form is

Drag a component to your form, you can add functions to it easily, try double clicking the component.

int main() {
InitializeComponent();
//MAIN CODE GOES HERE DUH!
}

class Class1 {
// all your class ****
}

private void Function(string functionParameters){
//function code
}

And yeah, there ya have it, the fundamentals of C#.
Pretty much everything about the windows form you can figure out on your own by playing around with buttons, it's easy ****.