Which One Of These Do You Prefer?

[CompacticCo]

Originally Posted by .Arco

You're my friend and all, but I highly doubt its a custom source.
Are you sure it's not a very very edited lotf/hybrid?

None of the above..

[Secrets-man]

Originally Posted by .Arco

Either Hyrbid's or CoEmu is your best bet.

Yeah. Just That I Failed Setting up CoEmu Before T_T Like I got It Running, but couldn't log in, lol. Well, I did Once, but didn't see any NPC's there. =x But I think I'll try QuickCo's 5095 CoEmu source.. LegalConquer said It has only 1 bug.. Not sure if that's so, but I'll try and find it out. Interested of Coding In C# , So Wanna Try and fix something and maybe make something new =]

[pro4never]

Originally Posted by Secrets-man

Yeah. Just That I Failed Setting up CoEmu Before T_T Like I got It Running, but couldn't log in, lol. Well, I did Once, but didn't see any NPC's there. =x But I think I'll try QuickCo's 5095 CoEmu source.. LegalConquer said It has only 1 bug.. Not sure if that's so, but I'll try and find it out. Interested of Coding In C# , So Wanna Try and fix something and maybe make something new =]

If there were no npcs then you were probably using the blank database that came with the source. If you look in the original post there is a link to one that has been populated with npcs and basic monster spawns.

[CurseOfExcalibur]

Originally Posted by CompacticCo

None of the above..

Amazingly correct! None of the above! It was a crappy TQ binary till I convinced you to try using v5017 LOTF.
And you, my friend still fail to realize the fact that programming is not your way.
My advice, go back to your TQ binary please, or GTFO and quit trying to look cool.

[CompacticCo]

Originally Posted by CurseOfExcalibur

Amazingly correct! None of the above! It was a crappy TQ binary till I convinced you to try using v5017 LOTF.
And you, my friend still fail to realize the fact that programming is not your way.
My advice, go back to your TQ binary please, or GTFO and quit trying to look cool.

I've never had a tq binary server. And I have no idea who you are, and I got myself into coding and private servers..

[ImmuneOne]

Originally Posted by CompacticCo

I've never had a tq binary server. And I have no idea who you are, and I got myself into coding and private servers..

I believe noone would reply like that if it wasn't true, despite the fact you still denying his comment. Have it your own way, and I hope the truth will eat you from inside.

[~Yuki~]

Originally Posted by Secrets-man

What about the one, the post where was the history of servers, and there was one of your sources =o Well Not Yours, but " Continued by Yuki " ... I'm not sure was it 5017 or 4351.. But I kinda would like to work with 4267 - 5017 ..

4351

And i got a SQL Version nearly ready wait for it

[~Falcon]

Regarding source(s):

None.

Regarding client version:

4351.

I wouldn't put my players through the agony of any publicly released source, they're disgusting.

[~Falcon]

Originally Posted by 6Sh00ter

Well you gotta have a source to use the client o.0

Read the last part of my post, I was referring to the O.P, who asked what we prefer regarding publicly released sources, in my case, none.

Cause they're disgusting.

[ImmuneOne]

Originally Posted by ~Falcon

Read the last part of my post, I was referring to the O.P, who asked what we prefer regarding publicly released sources, in my case, none.

Cause they're disgusting.

Not necessarily every public source will suck that hard, if you're commonly talking about the released ones; then yes sir. A nice example; LOTF and even crappier modified LOTF 5165.

Simply by creating your own base you study your own style, incase you use publiziced sources you have to follow their style and will get stuck with that style.

[.Guru]

4351

[Kiyono]

Originally Posted by ~Yuki~

4351

And i got a SQL Version nearly ready wait for it

So you're still working on that 2.1 source?

[.Guru]

he's working with PWNQUER 4351, and yes i do believe its the "2.1" you're talking about