|
You last visited: Today at 04:22
Advertisement
Jonquer (Server-Emulator)
Discussion on Jonquer (Server-Emulator) within the CO2 Private Server forum part of the Conquer Online 2 category.
11/02/2009, 00:21
|
#1
|
elite*gold: 0 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 550
Received Thanks: 81
|
Jonquer (Server-Emulator)
Jonquer (a Java Conquer-Online Emulator) is making fast progress on the next open-source Conquer-Server.
The official forums have been launched and are located here:  (Register to see boards)
All the details you need to know about the emulator will be located there.
|
|
|
|
11/02/2009, 00:37
|
#2
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,765
Received Thanks: 382
|
Very good work goodluck 
|
|
|
|
|
11/02/2009, 00:40
|
#3
|
elite*gold: 1142
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,464
Received Thanks: 1,162
|
I wish you the best luck on this project, intresting to see how a Java source work out!
GL mate
|
|
|
|
|
11/02/2009, 00:41
|
#4
|
elite*gold: 20
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,126
Received Thanks: 2,518
|
No link back to epvpers = fail.
Also, no where does it mention what client version the server is targetted at.
|
|
|
|
|
11/02/2009, 00:44
|
#5
|
elite*gold: 20
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,042
Received Thanks: 252
|
Well, even though the open-source idea is a major fail. I hope you have much success with your project.
|
|
|
|
|
11/02/2009, 00:44
|
#6
|
elite*gold: 20
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,012
Received Thanks: 2,885
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EmmeTheCoder
I wish you the best luck on this project, intresting to see how a Java source work out!
GL mate
|
It's the same as a C# source using different classes, methods and slightly different syntax.
-Think-
|
|
|
|
|
11/02/2009, 00:45
|
#7
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,765
Received Thanks: 382
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by InfamousNoone
It's the same as a C# source using different classes, methods and slightly different syntax.
-Think-
|
But java is different, but is it harder or easier?
Good to see you again
|
|
|
|
|
11/02/2009, 00:46
|
#8
|
elite*gold: 20
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,103
Received Thanks: 254
|
its pretty much the same as C# not much of a dif
|
|
|
|
|
11/02/2009, 00:49
|
#9
|
elite*gold: 20
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,012
Received Thanks: 2,885
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by grillmad
But java is different, but is it harder or easier?
Good to see you again
|
Uh, In my opinion if you had compared Java to C# 2.0, I'd say they were about even and it's hard to find an article or an argument comparing Java to C# 4.0 (or 3.0 for that matter).
If you compare the development of .NET compared to Java, .NET is the way to go in my opinion. Java is great for cross-platform, sure, but as I (emphasis on I) have always said, I don't plan on writing code expected to run on a Mac or Linux; Windows is where it's at. .NET has grown immensely over the last few years just look at LINQ from C# 3.0, and Dynamic Objects in C# 4.0 (Beta?).
If your fluent in Java, you can easily change and become fluent in C#, and vice-versa. The only real difficulty is re-learning what classes you use for what. For instance in C# you use the "Socket" class for both a server and a client. In Java I believe there's a class called "ServerSocket" or "TcpServer".
|
|
|
|
|
11/02/2009, 00:49
|
#10
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 550
Received Thanks: 81
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Korvacs
No link back to epvpers = fail.
Also, no where does it mention what client version the server is targetted at.
|
We will link back, person in charge of the ftp/web is out atm.
Client version is targeted at 5017, i should go mention that.
|
|
|
|
|
11/02/2009, 22:11
|
#11
|
elite*gold: 1142
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,464
Received Thanks: 1,162
|
Cleaned up!
|
|
|
|
|
11/03/2009, 06:23
|
#12
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 550
Received Thanks: 81
|
cheers for that, more updates on forums.
|
|
|
|
|
11/04/2009, 18:09
|
#13
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 418
Received Thanks: 49
|
Goodluck dude
|
|
|
|
|
11/04/2009, 18:36
|
#14
|
elite*gold: 20
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,338
Received Thanks: 490
|
just a hint:
Domain Default page
If you see this page it means that Apache Domain Service for this domain is locked, or there's no such Apache Domain Service registered in Parallels Operations Automation.
For more information please contact your service provider.
|
|
|
|
|
11/04/2009, 20:49
|
#15
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 128
Received Thanks: 50
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Yuki~
just a hint:
Domain Default page
If you see this page it means that Apache Domain Service for this domain is locked, or there's no such Apache Domain Service registered in Parallels Operations Automation.
For more information please contact your service provider.
|
Working on it, thanks.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Similar Threads
|
Jonquer 1.5
06/05/2010 - CO2 Private Server - 3 Replies
Jonquer onLine is cLosed?
|
(COCP) Jonquer 1.5 Alpha testing
05/26/2010 - CO2 PServer Archive - 12 Replies
This is the first public test spin of the Jonquer emulator (the server behind the Conquer Online Community Project, right now it's progressed a lot more than the public version in the SVN on google code (because i can't commit changes to it at the moment, for some reason)
The server is hosted on a friends powerful dedicated server.
Download 5017 Client (if you don't have one): MEGAUPLOAD - The leading online storage and file delivery service
Edit the server.dat / or CIDServer.dat (if...
|
Jonquer Server
02/15/2010 - CO2 Private Server - 4 Replies
It's been quite awhile now since me (xEnt) and s.bat last worked on this.
jonquer - Revision 106: /trunk/Jonquer
It's open source and in the google code vault, the link above is the base folder to the project, it had/has a lot of progress and great potential to beat all the existing open source Conquer server's, and if i recall correctly the only one open-source written in Java.
The version is 5017 and is unfinished/abandoned, we both just grew away from it.
I can't 100% remember...
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:22.
|
|
