Proof of concept - Ingame Vote System

[Ultimation]

Do i need to say anymore?



PS: Direct X is amazing

[_DreadNought_]

You never fail to amaze.

[Ultimation]

i can troll too

[Spirited]

I'm trying to understand how you did this one, are you using a DirectX hook with a few resource edits to Conquer.exe, or are you doing something else? Again, amazing - I seriously love seeing these threads from you, they always make me think.

[ImmuneOne]

Originally Posted by Fang

I'm trying to understand how you did this one, are you using a DirectX hook with a few resource edits to Conquer.exe, or are you doing something else? Again, amazing - I seriously love seeing these threads from you, they always make me think.

I believe I released a lib back then that pretty much hinted at how you should initialize it.

[Spirited]

Originally Posted by ImmuneOne

I believe I released a lib back then that pretty much hinted at how you should initialize it.

You did, that's why I was asking. I'm really interested to know if that's the general idea he used to program this feature.

[ImmuneOne]

Originally Posted by Fang

You did, that's why I was asking. I'm really interested to know if that's the general idea he used to program this feature.

Your question is pretty retarded "I love Dx". I would of said this over Skype aswell so don't use advantage of territory.

[Spirited]

Originally Posted by ImmuneOne

Your question is pretty retarded "I love Dx". I would of said this over Skype aswell so don't use advantage of territory.

My educated question about how he programmed the feature is retarded, huh? Well, sorry that my two years of programming experience didn't cover this extremely specific programming technique. Please care to explain so I don't make the same mistake again.

[ImmuneOne]

Originally Posted by Fang

My educated question about how he programmed the feature is retarded, huh? Well, sorry that my two years of programming experience didn't cover this extremely specific programming technique. Please care to explain so I don't make the same mistake again.

Long answer: yes, short answer: yes.

Love it when you automaticly go into defense mode.

[Spirited]

Originally Posted by ImmuneOne

Long answer: yes, short answer: yes.

Love it when you automaticly go into defense mode.

I believe I'm responding appropriately. I'm requesting that you provide me with more information because my limited experience doesn't include this subject. If you're unable to explain to me why my question was so "retarded", then hopefully another member will because I'm very interested in this subject.

[Deathmist]

Originally Posted by ImmuneOne

Your question is pretty retarded "I love Dx". I would of said this over Skype aswell so don't use advantage of territory.

Why was his question retarded? I think there is nothing retarded about his question tho.

[ImmuneOne]

Originally Posted by Fang

I believe I'm responding appropriately. I'm requesting that you provide me with more information because my limited experience doesn't include this subject. If you're unable to explain to me why my question was so "retarded", then hopefully another member will because I'm very interested in this subject.

Well if you look up more on the subject you will be amazed how resourceful the internet is. I don't believe me or Ulti are going to share any documentation for that matter.

[Spirited]

Originally Posted by ImmuneOne

Well if you look up more on the subject you will be amazed how resourceful the internet is. I don't believe me or Ulti are going to share any documentation for that matter.

The community is in a troubling state when the top contributors and programmers in the community are telling each other to screw off and figure things out on their own. I'm not asking for a detailed explanation on how to implement such a thing, I was simply asking what technologies were used. I was trying to be social and ask what approach he took. I know the technology now thanks to another member. If you don't want members to know of that technology, fine. I won't tread on anyone's feet, so to speak. Though, it's just unnecessary drama in my opinion and a harm on the people actually interested. Sorry you found my interest to be retarded.

[Super Aids]

With some reverse engineering and the winapi this could be achieved as well. I know Conquer blocks childs that are not created by itself. (At least from my experience?)

You could start out going from the call to EnumChildWindows in Conquer.exe and figure out where it checks for such ****.



I'm sure this is not the way Ulti did it tho, but meh.

[Ultimation]

Dunno what happened to this thread but lets start at the beginning.

Q: How it works?
A: its a simple EndScene hook on the Direct3DDevice8, Those who know me know ive used this technique before.

Originally Posted by Super Aids

With some reverse engineering and the winapi this could be achieved as well. I know Conquer blocks childs that are not created by itself. (At least from my experience?)

You could start out going from the call to EnumChildWindows in Conquer.exe and figure out where it checks for such shit.



I'm sure this is not the way Ulti did it tho, but meh.

On the latest client as far as i know the easiest way to get past there protection is to hook GetModuleName (Or something like that). And GetWindowText?? (spomething like that) and check the data against your window name and return null or false. That pretty much takes care of tqs EnumWindos and EnumModules.

Though in this case because its a hook, the GUI that u see there is nothing but several images behaving like a GUI. So EnumWindows wouldnt detect them anyway

And if you wanted to Hook into binaries, Alot of them have added a check to MSCore.dll for .net framework so i simply Hook ExitProcess(); and do a infinite Loop, This tends to hold there "AntiCheat" threads :P

Also Added Ingame Item Stat Trading System.