Identifying a Good Server

[InfamousNoone]

1. They (the owner/s) actually have a cool username, or use just their name in general.
Proof of this
Qonquer - Cool, Servers good
Ultimation - Cool, Good server
Hybrid - (Biased?) Cool, Good server
Andy - Normal Name, Good Server
XMasterrrr - Bad Name, Bad Server
koio - Bad Name, Bad Server

2. They understand how to port forward.
Proof of this
All Hamachi servers such, need I say more?

3. They've written their own source.
Proof of this
TQ binaries servers -> Gay
LOTF -> Bound to fail

4. They're not saying **** like "give us donations if you want us to stay up".
Proof of this
A good server will ask for donations, and mabye give a few things if you donate i.e. CoEmu (v2, by Andy) Qonquer,
or won't ask for donations at all, i.e. AcidCO.

Any LOTF, or TQ Binary server asking for donations should just be ignored.

5. The owner actually knows how to code, and knows what they're doing.
Proof of this
Back when I was a novice at C#, HybridCO epically died due to me "experimenting with pointers" and ******* my source beyond fixing.

6. They bought me pie, narcotics, or a prostitute without stds was attractive and "knew what she was doing".

Oh and lastly

7. If the server advertisement claims anything like "new best server" or anything along those lines, it's probably going to be **** (assuming nobody knows who the **** the guy posting about it is).

[tao4229]

****, my name's lame

[tanelipe]

Originally Posted by InfamousNoone

7. If the server advertisement claims anything like "new best server" or anything along those lines, it's probably going to be **** (assuming nobody knows who the **** the guy posting about it is).

You almost fit in what you just described. XD

[kinshi88]

Originally Posted by InfamousNoone

7. If the server advertisement claims anything like "new best server" or anything along those lines, it's probably going to be **** (assuming nobody knows who the **** the guy posting about it is).

We ALL know who Hybrid is =P

[Korvacs]

Reasonable development time? 12 months+ would be proof of a decent server.

[tao4229]

Originally Posted by Korvacs

Reasonable development time? 12 months+ would be proof of a decent server.

AcidCO wasn't even developped for a year <.>

Korvac's is a cool name though

[lostsolder05]

Originally Posted by Korvacs

Reasonable development time? 12 months+ would be proof of a decent server.

unless ofc, they just slacked off that whole 12 months+

[Kiyono]

Who is koio ?
I've never seen him post before yet he is stupid enough to be mentioned as a example of an owner of a bad server....

[Korvacs]

Originally Posted by lostsolder05

unless ofc, they just slacked off that whole 12 months+

Well alrite, active development, and the old user obviously.