+9

[RainbowOrange]

2 +1 items=+1
4 +1 items=+2
10 +1 items=+3
28+1 items=+4
82+1 items=+5
244+1 items=+6
730+1 items=+7
2188+1 items=+8
6562+1 items=+9

guess this aint that important now since tq made those + stone thing

[spoonieluv97]

"6562+1 items=+9"

^^ so crazy. nobody gonna do that. just win 3 +8s from lotto and trade them for the ones you want. I just made it sound easy, but it would probably take months to find somebody with the +8 you wanted that wants the +8 you have. I know like a +1 ring is better than a +2 warr armor, but at numbers like +8, it probably doesn't amtter what item, they are +8's

[RainbowOrange]

yea i know that why i said it not important anymoe after stupid patch

[CONQUER 2.0]

rofl 2 +1s make a +2 also

[kleinster]

Originally posted by CONQUER 2.0@Jan 22 2007, 01:02
rofl 2 +1s make a +2 also

He means in total i guess

[RainbowOrange]

Originally posted by CONQUER 2.0@Jan 22 2007, 01:02
rofl 2 +1s make a +2 also

i meant from +0 to +2 not from +1 to +2

[Coksnuss]

Then +3 would need 12 +1's instead of 10 , or?

(3 +2 = +3)

[gentonk]

Originally posted by Coksnuss@Jan 22 2007, 09:24
Then +3 would need 12 +1's instead of 10 , or?

(3 +2 = +3)

no .. she's right .. it only needs 10 [+1]

1 [+2] --> updated item = 1*4 [+1] = 4 [+1]
2 [+2] --> 2 * 1 [+2] = 2 * 3 [+1] = 6 [+1]

then total = 4 [+1] + 6 [+1] = 10 [+1]

the formula :

total = ((tn - 1) * 2) + tn

tn = total needed [+1]

ex : for +3 :
tn = 4 from [+2]

total = ((4-1) * 2) + 4 = 10

but the strange is when i tried to calculate using +1 calculator from CO forum, it's wrong amount on +6 (it's 344) and higher ... i guess the calculator is wrong

[fady1wu]

erm lol.
geush you like math :P
but this is whel known

[gentonk]

lol .. but yeah it's well known .. just trying to correct Coksnuss ... and when i looked on [+1] image about composing which i got long time ago, the amount is also wrong ..

[freddofrog~]

Originally posted by gentonk+Jan 22 2007, 11:27--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (gentonk @ Jan 22 2007, 11:27)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--Coksnuss@Jan 22 2007, 09:24
Then +3 would need 12 +1's instead of 10 , or?

(3 +2 = +3)

no .. she's right .. it only needs 10 [+1]

1 [+2] --> updated item = 1*4 [+1] = 4 [+1]
2 [+2] --> 2 * 1 [+2] = 2 * 3 [+1] = 6 [+1]

then total = 4 [+1] + 6 [+1] = 10 [+1]

the formula :

total = ((tn - 1) * 2) + tn

tn = total needed [+1]

ex : for +3 :
tn = 4 from [+2]

total = ((4-1) * 2) + 4 = 10

but the strange is when i tried to calculate using +1 calculator from CO forum, it's wrong amount on +6 (it's 344) and higher ... i guess the calculator is wrong [/b][/quote]
ok u have that massive calculation thingo...i have

the next + will take 3* as many +1's as the first, so for +3 from +2 u need 6 because +1-+2 takes 2.... so much easier, just *3 each time

[gentonk]

Originally posted by freddofrog~+Jan 22 2007, 12:01--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (freddofrog~ @ Jan 22 2007, 12:01)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> ok u have that massive calculation thingo...i have

the next + will take 3* as many +1's as the first, so for +3 from +2 u need 6 because +1-+2 takes 2.... so much easier, just *3 each time [/b]

don't understand :dizzy: ... just *3 from what ? total [+1] of upgraded one ? then u're wrong .. tried to calculate using your *3 until [+9] ... or atleast try to calculate [+4] ..

and also :

<!--QuoteBegin--RainbowOrange@Today 01:20
i meant from +0 to +2 not from +1 to +2 [/quote]

[yaoball]

@ gentonk Hmmm, yea but if according to her, '' i meant from +0 to +2 not from +1 to +2 ''.
Then +3 should have been 12. cux its 3*(1*4 [+1] = 4 [+1]) ^^

[tasha]

use this to see how many +1's and how much it will cost you

[gentonk]

Originally posted by yaoball+Jan 22 2007, 16:32--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (yaoball @ Jan 22 2007, 16:32)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>@ gentonk Hmmm, yea but if according to her, '' i meant from +0 to +2 not from +1 to +2 ''.
Then +3 should have been 12. cux its 3*(1*4 [+1] = 4 [+1]) ^^[/b]

no .. i had showed it detail before ..

no .. she's right .. it only needs 10 [+1]

1 [+2] --> updated item = 1*4 [+1] = 4 [+1] <-- it's from 0 to +2
2 [+2] --> 2 * 1 [+2] = 2 * 3 [+1] = 6 [+1]

then total = 4 [+1] + 6 [+1] = 10 [+1]

and it's same total from tasha and from copc co forum


<hr>Append on Jan 23 2007, 07:46<hr><!--QuoteBegin--tasha@Jan 22 2007, 16:47
use this to see how many +1's and how much it will cost you

[/quote]
hope the image will show ...

but if not then input like this :

[u][b]Input :[/b][/u]
[b]Current Item + :[/b] [empty]
[b]Target Item +:[/b] [+3]
[b]Cost per +1:[/b] [0]

and you will get result like this :

[u][b]Result :[/b][/u]
[+0 to +1] 2 +1 items
[+1 to +2] 2 +1 items
[+2 to +3] 6 +1 items
[+0 to +3] 10 +1 items

<hr>Append on Jan 23 2007, 08:07<hr> sorry i post again .. coz when i edited previous post, it's mess up with HTML tag ..

here is the image from tasha link :


and here is the image from copc :