HwidSpoofer which should i use?

[GhostAimOfficial]

Originally Posted by LukeManolia

Ghost uses Voyager hypervisor, a widely detected tool on all anticheats.

It's just a matter of time for detection.

It's based of the Voyager Hyper-V hacking framework but it uses our own EPT/NPT framework for hooking memory at the hypervisor level. Most of the BSOD issues have been resolved by now as well. Plus we support Windows 10 2004 all the way up to the latest Windows 11/Windows 10 updates. The reason it works so well is that it's very hard to differentiate a regular Windows OS with Hyper-V enabled and one with GhostAim running as well as the fact that its much easier to boot system identifiers on boot at the lowest level than changing identifiers at runtime. Detections happen quite regularly for other spoofers, yet ours has been solid since we rewrote it over 7 months ago.

[SoulCheese]

Damm. That's a decent comeback. Guess the perm spoof kiddo is good in just throwing words without doing his research haha.

[LukeManolia]

Originally Posted by GhostAimOfficial

It's based of the Voyager Hyper-V hacking framework but it uses our own EPT/NPT framework for hooking memory at the hypervisor level. Most of the BSOD issues have been resolved by now as well. Plus we support Windows 10 2004 all the way up to the latest Windows 11/Windows 10 updates. The reason it works so well is that it's very hard to differentiate a regular Windows OS with Hyper-V enabled and one with GhostAim running as well as the fact that its much easier to boot system identifiers on boot at the lowest level than changing identifiers at runtime. Detections happen quite regularly for other spoofers, yet ours has been solid since we rewrote it over 7 months ago.

Oh god, please don't tell me that it's hard to differentiate a NORMAL hypervisor and Voyager. Run your spoofer on an actually respectable anti-cheat like vgk/faceit/eac/be and not this usermode garbage. You'll see that the anticheat driver will get automatically stopped thus you wont be able to launch game//Valorant. You basing your hypervisor off Voyager means you hook tthe same things as Voyager, and have their same routine. Considering Voyager is fully opensource, please tell me how you plan to update it if this incompetent brand decides to outsource an anticheat from EAC/BE.💀

Originally Posted by SoulCheese

Damm. That's a decent comeback. Guess the perm spoof kiddo is good in just throwing words without doing his research haha.

"Decent", you 100% did not understand a single word he said.

[Johann12911]

Originally Posted by LukeManolia

Oh ***, please don't tell me that it's hard to differentiate a NORMAL hypervisor and Voyager. Run your spoofer on an actually respectable anti-cheat like vgk/faceit/eac/be and not this usermode garbage. You'll see that the anticheat driver will get automatically stopped thus you wont be able to launch game//Valorant. You basing your hypervisor off Voyager means you hook tthe same things as Voyager, and have their same routine. Considering Voyager is fully opensource, please tell me how you plan to update it if this incompetent brand decides to outsource an anticheat from EAC/BE.💀



"Decent", you 100% did not understand a single word he said.

I mean bro ga supports eac/be games & valorant, which I myself use it for, so idk if you really know how it works

[LukeManolia]

Originally Posted by Johann12911

I mean bro ga supports eac/be games & valorant, which I myself use it for, so idk if you really know how it works

Sure it does, if I can write a usermode timing check detection for it in 30minutes, anticheats can do it in 15.

[SoulCheese]

"Decent", you 100% did not understand a single word he said.

Nah I don't understand a single thing. But I don't need to since I'm not trashtalking others.

[LukeManolia]

Originally Posted by SoulCheese

Nah I don't understand a single thing. But I don't need to since I'm not trashtalking others.

If you understood, you would know its not trashtalking rather me exposing what GhostAim's lazy *** pasted from github.

[SauceMachine]

Originally Posted by LukeManolia

Sure it does, if I can write a usermode timing check detection for it in 30minutes, anticheats can do it in 15.

just for your information, writing an rdtsc fixup in kernel takes no less.

[LukeManolia]

Originally Posted by SauceMachine

just for your information, writing an rdtsc fixup in kernel takes no less.

that is only 1 detection vector out of many, but sure.

[SauceMachine]

Originally Posted by LukeManolia

that is only 1 detection vector out of many, but sure.

Of course, there's an entire arsenal of anti-hv techniques. I only mentioned this because you were talking about this specific one.

[LukeManolia]

Originally Posted by SauceMachine

Of course, there's an entire arsenal of anti-hv techniques. I only mentioned this because you were talking about this specific one.

Oh alright, I thought you were defending them.

[SauceMachine]

Originally Posted by LukeManolia

Oh alright, I thought you were defending them.

I'm not defending or taking anyone's side, nor do I know these people or their software. I was simply dropping a comment on your statement and that's it.