[Unofficial] List of Legit / Scam COD Cheat Providers

[Playy]

Originally Posted by Outsider

14 posts, registered Sept 2012.

Ok buddy.

im probably close to that registered very long time ago and only few posts

[samealexx]

Originally Posted by Outsider

14 posts, registered Sept 2012.

Ok buddy.

101 posts, registered May 2021.

Ok buddy.

[Krad3z3]

Small FYI, we are joining PO with native controller support this week. We have it fully working for XBOX and PS5 controllers.

No remapping or 3rd party software needed. Simply plug your controller in and our cheat will automatically recognize which controller you are using and you can set any keybind you want.

External cheat for people not following us.

[ECZlitz]

Originally Posted by nojjjj

Yeah I feel that there's only two here i haven't tried... l1ney and elocarry. Can't use elocarry because they have no radar. You can't play legit without radar and if you're not playing legit in cod it's an instant shadowbann.

We will add radar when our new menu is live (early December). Till then we have added "Visible only" which helps when playing legitimately.

[ITAVB]

Originally Posted by zfishmac1997

Hello i guys im Using SyntheticSkill for 3Weeks RN and im very happy with this chair its works perfekt and the people are doing good stuff

i can recommend the Cheat

and u can use it in Bo6 MP and in Warzone and still they will add Zombies. very good

have a nice day guys.

Lucky for you it works for you because for me it doesn't work out of nowhere the cheat stops working the ESP disappears out of nowhere the aimbot stops working only the menu that appears, man I've been in the cheating business for years but I've never seen a problematic cheat like this I wasted my money on this I'm going back to PO which is the best place

[evobyte]

Originally Posted by ECZlitz

We will add radar when our new menu is live (early December). Till then we have added "Visible only" which helps when playing legitimately.

Y tho. Radar is the easier to make than esp. It just takes a few seconds to add it

Trust score tho lmao. Who ever made that up is a genius troll.

[zebleer]

Originally Posted by nojjjj

---Quote (Originally by nojjjj)---
To obfuscate obviously, the more people that get banned using shit the less people that are using your good shit = Less likely you'll run into cheesers that can beat you without raging, and it creates a barrier to entry for lazy nubs that will rage with legit cheeses and eventually get them flagged for manual.

We have the same issue in the cs2 scene the best external is espdx2(costs about $4) but they only promote expensive trash externals with a detection history =D. The cheating scene is full of fags.

As for Aimmaster I wouldn't trust, giving away a cs2 cheese for free to your users whilst claiming its better than every other external yet its not updated or actively worked on is a joke flex and copied right out of the AtomicDma playbook.
---End Quote---
Yeah I feel that there's only two here i haven't tried... l1ney and elocarry. Can't use elocarry because they have no radar. You can't play legit without radar and if you're not playing legit in cod it's an instant shadowbann. We all know it's true. Dk what happened to kernaim being on the list because I haven't been here in a minute but kernaim is probably low key top dog right now. I truly hate to say it but that's just how it is. Proofcore is solid but $50 hurts the pockets. Kernaims detected history is pretty solid, of course it's not perfect but the future might hold good things for them later on. I'm an iri, so is my buddy. We play with po one day and the next 7 were shadowed. Then we play with po one day then next 7 shadowed. To much of a bad experience using them, feels like Activision low key has it detected.. it feels like Activision knows every po user who is playing and just issues them shadowbans 24/7 instead of permabans. What ever tho if I gotta re purchase the game ev
ery 6 months or year because kernaim is detected so be it.. when kerns going strong, they are going strong let me tell yah. There's always 1 big player that owns multiple smaller players. It all boils down to kernaim, elocarry, proofcore & l1ney the way I see it currently. I'd prob lean towards proofcore if I truly wanted to feel the safest, though.
-----------

since Hugh loves deleting my posts that don't break any rules or anything I figured I'd repost the entire thing. It's crazy how they just delete shit, paid off or what? what was the reason?

PO is obviously detected in some way, Zeebler was good but he got so arrogant keeps bragging about being the best, calling out companies etc guy painted a massive target on his back by being a douche for no reason. Also his claims that his DMA cheese is undetectable is a joke. As soon as I saw that I realised he's gone off and time to stay well away.

- I've never asked for any post to be deleted. I always reply to criticism just as I am now
- PO is not detected or flagged in any way right now as usual
- The PO DMA cheats themselves are indeed unable to be detected, as they are read only. The detection vector for DMA cheaters would be the firmware flashed to their DMA board, not the read only DMA cheat software running on the second computer

[evobyte]

Originally Posted by zebleer

- I've never asked for any post to be deleted. I always reply to criticism just as I am now
- PO is not detected or flagged in any way right now as usual
- The PO DMA cheats themselves are indeed unable to be detected, as they are read only. The detection vector for DMA cheaters would be the firmware flashed to their DMA board, not the read only DMA cheat software running on the second computer

Hypothetically speaking Wouldn't it be smarter for Activision to not send bans and instead know who each and every one of them are and just stop them with shadowbans? The one who's in charge is the code is the one in charge of the destination correct?

[zebleer]

Originally Posted by evobyte

Hypothetically speaking Wouldn't it be smarter for Activision to not send bans

No, not banning cheaters isn't a smarter idea than banning cheaters

Glad I could clear that up for you

Also it's maddening to see that this PO detection accusation started because you got a SB after using 5+ cheats. Maybe stop injecting so many cheats if you don't want to get SB. Just use PO & closet cheat, you'll be fine. PO has no issues right now

[fortnitegod_]

is PO still safe?

[nojjjj]

Originally Posted by zebleer

- I've never asked for any post to be deleted. I always reply to criticism just as I am now
- PO is not detected or flagged in any way right now as usual
- The PO DMA cheats themselves are indeed unable to be detected, as they are read only. The detection vector for DMA cheaters would be the firmware flashed to their DMA board, not the read only DMA cheat software running on the second computer

My guy ofc it can be detected, there is no such thing as undetectable. You aren't even providing the ''undetectable'' FW. Which would be what helps make it undetectable or even linking people to it. Your acting like your DMA would bypass faceit etc if people had the right FW(which you dont provide).

and if you have time to answer me you should probably go answer the CS2 threads that need your attention, I hear plenty of people are begging for updates.
Personaly I used PO for a while no problems same with cs2(although I have told you countless times the RCS is dog water), but the moment you started claiming undetectable I was out.

Also I never accused you of having my post deleted, just Hugh loves deleting my posts =)

[evobyte]

Originally Posted by zebleer

No, not banning cheaters isn't a smarter idea than banning cheaters

Glad I could clear that up for you

Also it's maddening to see that this PO detection accusation started because you got a SB after using 5+ cheats. Maybe stop injecting so many cheats if you don't want to get SB. Just use PO & closet cheat, you'll be fine. PO has no issues right now

Is this impossible for Activision to do yes or no??

Hypothetically speaking Wouldn't it be smarter for Activision to not send bans and instead know who each and every one of them are and just stop them with shadowbans? The one who's in charge is the code is the one in charge of the destination correct?

The trust score is a bunch of mumbo jumbo. Who ever though of that is a genius troll.

Any of you guys have received your " trust worthy gamer " certificate yet and hang it up on the wall?

You wanna use ESP? TRUST SCORE WILL ALLOW YOU TO USE IT!
You wanna use RADAR? GOTTA HAVE A GOOD TRUST SCORE!
You wanna use AIMBOT? BETTER HAVE A GOOD TRUST SCORE!!
You wanna put toast in the TOASTER? BETTER HAVE A GOOD TRUST SCORE

[SyntheticSkill]

Originally Posted by nojjjj

My guy ofc it can be detected, there is no such thing as undetectable. You aren't even providing the ''undetectable'' FW. Which would be what helps make it undetectable or even linking people to it. Your acting like your DMA would bypass faceit etc if people had the right FW(which you dont provide).

Zeeblers statement is factual, currently Ricochet has 0 protection against DMA solutions, you could use any card with stock firmware currently and you would not get banned. His statement that it can't be detected is currently accurate. Of course that may change in the future, but we are talking about right now.

Originally Posted by evobyte

Is this impossible for Activision to do yes or no??

Hypothetically speaking Wouldn't it be smarter for Activision to not send bans and instead know who each and every one of them are and just stop them with shadowbans? The one who's in charge is the code is the one in charge of the destination correct?

The trust score is a bunch of mumbo jumbo. Who ever though of that is a genius troll.

Any of you guys have received your " trust worthy gamer " certificate yet and hang it up on the wall?

You wanna use ESP? TRUST SCORE WILL ALLOW YOU TO USE IT!
You wanna use RADAR? GOTTA HAVE A GOOD TRUST SCORE!
You wanna use AIMBOT? BETTER HAVE A GOOD TRUST SCORE!!
You wanna put toast in the TOASTER? BETTER HAVE A GOOD TRUST SCORE

"Trust score" isn't actually a numerical score (at least not to my knowledge)

Think of it more in terms of a report threshold.

It is 100% a factor, that's why you see people with 4 year old accounts able to to rage cheat for hours, racking up dozens of reports without getting shadowed.

Then you see others who claim they play "very legit" eat 20 reports or less and get shadowed. Trust is a factor, how exactly its measured is unknown, but I can promise you there is a difference between a 4 year old account that's been actively played on, and a brand new account.

A brand new account doing better than CDL pro's is suspicious, sure, there may be some legit players out there that are good. But 99.9% of the time its a cheater, and they know it, which is why they don't mind shadowing so much.

[evobyte]

Originally Posted by SyntheticSkill

Zeeblers statement is factual, currently Ricochet has 0 protection against DMA solutions, you could use any card with stock firmware currently and you would not get banned. His statement that it can't be detected is currently accurate. Of course that may change in the future, but we are talking about right now.



"Trust score" isn't actually a numerical score (at least not to my knowledge)

Think of it more in terms of a report threshold.

It is 100% a factor, that's why you see people with 4 year old accounts able to to rage cheat for hours, racking up dozens of reports without getting shadowed.

Then you see others who claim they play "very legit" eat 20 reports or less and get shadowed. Trust is a factor, how exactly its measured is unknown, but I can promise you there is a difference between a 4 year old account that's been actively played on, and a brand new account.

A brand new account doing better than CDL pro's is suspicious, sure, there may be some legit players out there that are good. But 99.9% of the time its a cheater, and they know it, which is why they don't mind shadowing so much.

So if an aged account is the first step to becoming a successful cheater shouldn't we have a legit list for aged account sellers also on this thread? Who do you buy aged accounts from SS? If we can get some trusted aged account sellers on this list we can all avoid shadow bans here. This would be a game changer in the epvp call of duty section.

[Fighters87]

Originally Posted by nojjjj

My guy ofc it can be detected, there is no such thing as undetectable. You aren't even providing the ''undetectable'' FW. Which would be what helps make it undetectable or even linking people to it. Your acting like your DMA would bypass faceit etc if people had the right FW(which you dont provide).

what the **** are you talking about? even direct is not detectable and they don't provide fw. why should they do that? they are cheat providers not dma hardware providers.

regarding "evobyte" i'm surprised it's still on this forum...