[Question] Ranger build

[gotemans]

I'm popping a question again because I'm building a new toon.

What do you guys think about this build:

[fontaine]

fine but no need for nimbless i think

[WTF-imdoinyamom]

wtf, this is no good build when i see it Oo

[gotemans]

tell me what's not good about it ;-)

8 aoes for PvE, requiered skills maxed, lolzzzzzzzzz

[Mesaskin]

if u think its a good build for u so use it^^ if u can lv fast with it use it!

[fontaine]

as i saw it that was a pve minded build so for that its fine

[gotemans]

+ wanted to add i will be a crit ranger ;-)

[Dudeter]

i think it is fine, but maybe 1pnt in shadow chaser ?

[topdogoncampus]

the only thing rangers are good for nowadays is buffs and cf with their high resis, other than that rangers suck

[Fishsticks1]

Originally Posted by Dudeter

i think it is fine, but maybe 1pnt in shadow chaser ?

i agree with this

take out nimble and add 1 point in shadow chaser

Awsome in pk/chasing after a pk /runing from a pk

[lm@o]

true impact must be maxed, same for elemental core, 1 point in shadow chaser, mortal dagger isn't needed after 70, idk about lighting trap but i've never used ut, 1 point in invisibility, max elemental flavour, 0 points in nimbleness, life extintion is useless...

and maybe you would like to use a bow for faster crits

[jorik1994]

elemental favour is a funny skill ^^ if you in ice you need to use it on a other person he/she will pull much easier xD

[D4rkSt4r]

rangers are the class who most miss CM times.. now at webzen they rly need some improviment...
no point in nimbleness and endurance
arrow spear and multi strike no points (you dont need these aoes, pff dmg)
shadow chase, timed atack and mortal dagger could deserve 1 pt each, but nowdays with so many ppl running with high sb, i doubt you can have any fun trying to make them work
lighting trap useless
life extintion useless = doesnt work with criticals..

i dont play rangers anymore.. webzen farked a rly nice class.. but if i still playing ranger,i would do it:

[kinq1]

[lm@o]

am i missing something about True impact kinq?