Do not use aimbots (Info)

[Toxic..]

Originally Posted by Laurent_

No, but developer l1ney is also working on this project because he is very competent.



I've had some negative feedback from PRIME and STERN users on my Discord server. I guess they should have used the public version.
note : I would like to emphasize that I am not trying to discredit these suppliers. This information should be taken with caution, as it is based on comments from a few customers.

Have about every provider even DMA's, including Advance

[Laurent_]

Originally Posted by Toxic..

Have about every provider even DMA's, including Advance

I don't understand what you're talking about.

[Toxic..]

Originally Posted by Laurent_

I don't understand what you're talking about.

Many ban reports a long many different providers, don't sounds like a detection but a AI Wave before/after update

[Laurent_]

Originally Posted by Toxic..

Many ban reports a long many different providers, don't sounds like a detection but a AI Wave before/after update

That's the excuse he gives. I wrote about it above, and what's more, today on the forum it was revealed that during this investigation, most of the suppliers you mentioned were given unknown status
But if you read the evidence, it's damning.

https://www.elitepvpers.com/forum/ar...l#post40476195

Please note that I had already warned you 48 hours earlier what was going to happen.

Now don't come crying here that you've been banned. I told you to choose your suppliers carefully. It's not too late yet; you can still do it.

[Toxic..]

Originally Posted by Laurent_

That's the excuse he gives. I wrote about it above, and what's more, today on the forum it was revealed that during this investigation, most of the suppliers you mentioned were given unknown status
But if you read the evidence, it's damning.



Please note that I had already warned you 48 hours earlier what was going to happen.

Now don't come crying here that you've been banned. I told you to choose your suppliers carefully. It's not too late yet; you can still do it.

I am not banned, the status are set to unknown because had ban reports, and the providers are investigating

I choose the correct providers dw

[Laurent_]

Originally Posted by Toxic..

I am not banned, the status are set to unknown because had ban reports, and the providers are investigating

I choose the correct providers dw

There is evidence of around fifty users being banned.

[Toxic..]

Originally Posted by Laurent_

There is evidence of around fifty users being banned.

Please show proofs then, cause the count was not that high

Anyways bans was everwhere including Advance

[GCS Cheats]

Anybrain doesn't look for "snapping" anymore, it looks for statistical consistency that humans can't maintain. Even with smoothing/humanization, if your micro-adjustments are too perfect over 100 kills, you get flagged. ESP is just safer ROI right now.

[praxislol]

Originally Posted by Laurent_

There is evidence of around fifty users being banned.<-- False

It was around 25 people+-.

Even if it was 50 people, that number alone doesn't say much, when you don't know the total user base of arc raiders prime.


I don't know who told you these things, but I think you should vet your sources, because the evidence is readily available by just counting the ban reports on the discord.

[.KaiZy]

Originally Posted by GCS Cheats

Anybrain doesn't look for "snapping" anymore, it looks for statistical consistency that humans can't maintain. Even with smoothing/humanization, if your micro-adjustments are too perfect over 100 kills, you get flagged. ESP is just safer ROI right now.

**** humanization then.

[GCS Cheats]

Originally Posted by .KaiZy

**** humanization then.

You sure about that? I don't think that it's the problem to be fair, could be wrong about it tho.

[Laurent_]

Originally Posted by praxislol

It was around 25 people+-.

Even if it was 50 people, that number alone doesn't say much, when you don't know the total user base of arc raiders prime.


I don't know who told you these things, but I think you should vet your sources, because the evidence is readily available by just counting the ban reports on the discord.

I had posted the link to the thread, but unfortunately it was deleted. Anyway, enough people saw it, and it even caused controversy in the official legit list.

There is no point in defending the indefensible. We are going around in circles. To recap, they admit to having had between 25 and 50 bans. They give a rather unconvincing explanation but still admit to having had bans.

They themselves claim that this affects around 10 to 15% of their player base, and boast about it, saying that this figure is relatively low. Personally, I would be ashamed. He doesn't even think about their customers. So if you like a provider who thinks like him, do as you please.

[praxislol]

Originally Posted by Laurent_

I had posted the link to the thread, but unfortunately it was deleted. Anyway, enough people saw it, and it even caused controversy in the official legit list.

There is no point in defending the indefensible. We are going around in circles. To recap, they admit to having had between 25 and 50 bans. They give a rather unconvincing explanation but still admit to having had bans.

They themselves claim that this affects around 10 to 15% of their player base, and boast about it, saying that this figure is relatively low. Personally, I would be ashamed. He doesn't even think about their customers. So if you like a provider who thinks like him, do as you please.

I think you're quite confused.



One prime dev on the discord said 10%, that is true. They said 10% of the user base got hit and then they immediately took down the cheat to investigate and is actively testing it now with no bans to make sure nothing bad is afoot, which indicates actually the opposite of not thinking about their customers I don't even know where you got the boasting from, and any prime user can corroborate this. Do you think toxic is a dev on prime by any chance, because he is not?.


This will end my posts with you, since you're clearly misinformed.

Quick edit: Please find a screenshot of the boasting from prime devs, because I couldn't find any here or on discord, if you can, then I might believe you.

[Laurent_]

Originally Posted by praxislol

I think you're quite confused.



One prime dev on the discord said 10%, that is true. They said 10% of the user base got hit and then they immediately took down the cheat to investigate and is actively testing it now with no bans to make sure nothing bad is afoot, which indicates actually the opposite of not thinking about their customers I don't even know where you got the boasting from, and any prime user can corroborate this. Do you think toxic is a dev on prime by any chance, because he is not?.


This will end my posts with you, since you're clearly misinformed.

Quick edit: Please find a screenshot of the boasting from prime devs, because I couldn't find any here or on discord, if you can, then I might believe you.

I never considered Toxic to be a leading developer, and on the forum, when this pseudo-drama occurred, they pointed out that it was “only” 10 to 15%. If that's not bragging, then this message is misleading. Because saying it that way is like saying that 10 to 15 percent isn't a big deal.

The threads are banned every time, even the evidence of all the bans is deleted. There's no point in me putting them on my account, I'll just get a warning and it will be deleted, but they're easy to find on the forum or on their Discord.

[waryas]

Originally Posted by Toxic..

Please show proofs then, cause the count was not that high

Anyways bans was everwhere including Advance

"everywhere" we had 0 report yesterday. if any provider had a mini wave it's just EAC wanring to say hey you're detected That's how eac works.
One way to know is to check the 30day message of your users, if all of them are within 1min of each other (the deban date), you are detected. We had the same on elocarry last month on the 8th december.
The first 3 letters of the SID ban also tells if it's a AI ban, hwid ban or detection ban. (d52, d57, d4*)