I don't really get what you're trying to say there mister. How can it be a "waste" of time, when if you really want to develop as a programmer and eventually work as one, you would need to know different teqnuiqes of coding rather than the simple SQL queries that every public source out here has already? I really, really don't think anyone here is intrested in creating a server which they will do for a living, if they are it will most likely not go as good as finding a real job. So my point being, aim at being a successful programmer rather than having a succesful server, if that's your main goal.Quote:
Peoples learn different and korvacs is right.
Why waste time on learning something, when u can learn something wich is better, but the same.
[DEV] Conquer 53xx (Monk) Emulator [Yuki,Beatz]
12/01/2010 23:26
_Emme_#46
12/02/2010 04:35
bone-you#47
Quote:
Why waste time on learning something, when u can learn something wich is better, but the same.
Your work is on making servers, so why bother learning low level assembly or how to build kernels? Your logic is flawed. If you don't want to learn and better yourself, that's you. Many want to make an attempt to learn everything they possibly can, even if it's something that appears to be useless. LINQ actually has its uses.
My C# AMF lib uses LINQ. You're already sacrificing speed and power by using .NET in the first place, you might as well use the libraries and features it provides that you're already paying for. Plus, loading something from a relational database that you already have stored locally is a bigger waste of cycles than using LINQ on that data internally.
12/02/2010 19:21
~Falcon#48
Just curious, do you ever get off bashing C#/.NET?Quote:
12/02/2010 20:10
KraHen#49
Ignorance at it`s core :rolleyes: How was that bashing? It`s just a fact on top of which you can make your own decisions.Quote:
12/02/2010 20:17
~Falcon#50
Don't give me the rolleyes when you have no idea what your talking about.Quote:
Research his post history, hence the 'do you ever'.
Here, have some rolleyes :rolleyes:
12/02/2010 23:30
_tao4229_#51
10q4:rolleyes:Quote:
Research his post history, hence the 'do you ever'.
Here, have some rolleyes :rolleyes:
12/03/2010 00:01
_Emme_#52
What he's saying is true tho, atleast for .NET speed. For example, regular pointers would be faster than embedded ones in an .NET array, right?Quote:
12/03/2010 01:20
bone-you#53
How is that bashing? Simply by using .NET you are truly sacrificing total performance potential. Chances are that absolute potential will not be needed by your program, but it's plain fact. LINQ is there, depending on how you use it it wouldn't hurt too much to use it and it may even be better.Quote:
12/03/2010 08:20
_Emme_#54
Agreed. Had some talk with Sparkie about it and after a while we both agreed to the same point; For complex queries, use LINQ>SQL correctly. For simple queries, use CompliedQuery.Quote:
Anyhow, we're going offtopic ^^
12/03/2010 19:15
Basser#55
Had the same conversation with Sparkie lol.Quote:
Anyhow, we're going offtopic ^^
12/29/2010 22:20
salimaster#56
Good luck guys hope it finish soon ^^'!
12/30/2010 02:19
Paradøx#57
Wow, this project sure looks sweet! I was reading this convo of the coders and I was like WTH? Anyway, I wish you the best of luck and keep us updated! :)
12/30/2010 02:28
Arcо#58
Dead project ftl.
12/30/2010 02:31
Paradøx#59
Why do you say that? :O Is it dead?Quote:
12/30/2010 03:42
pro4never#60
No update posts have been made in ages.Quote:
Project alchemy on the other hand you can expect an early open beta within a week.