[(Awesome)RELEASE] CoEmuv2.Nano(5095) Source Code

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiyono Isn't that already released? [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Heh! Someone beat me to it. xD

But I do like mine a lil' better... as it's more centralized..where all you have to do is "Handler.PreviousMap(CSocket.Client.PrevMap);" and you're pretty much done...unlike the other one I see which you have to declare the coordinates every time you use the function. x.x

But once again, very easy to do... <3

So if anyone *wants* to either see it or just wants it, then I'll release it.

edit: wow...I guess this post will be in the middle of an argument =(

You've re-brought the phrase HALP PLS to this community. Good work.
The TQ Binaries disappear, and now we have this, nice.

Quote:

Originally Posted by andyd123 Are you kidding? Sparkie literally released EVERYTHING people needed, you put it all into one file, change some NUMBERS, and you're good to go. Then why could only the majority do it? You'll have to do more work getting the encryption I released to work with LOTF, which is why you haven't seen ANYONE do it so far, because it's a waste of time.That is what 90% of the community do, they did it with lotf so why not his? I doubt its hard for a nooby c&p then change a few varibles and extentions o.0, sure, they need to update the packets, not that hard.. This wasn't uncalled for, if you had had input into the decision, sure, maybe then it was uncalled for, but what I do with what I created cannot be labeled 'uncalled for' because it technically is doing nothing wrong.

However that is my opinion therefore you have no judgement of what i say when i criticize a thread. And if it can't be labeled 'uncalled for' then why is it labeled '(Awesome)' when technically it isn't and isn't fully criticized to be given a solution to how good the source really is.

Think the community needs baby feeding again, maybe release your packet logger for them to log the packets 'if they understand them' enough damage done allready so i don't care what you do. So go ahead if you want to...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultimatum However that is my opinion therefore you have no judgement of what i say when i criticize a thread. And if it can't be labeled 'uncalled for' then why is it labeled '(Awesome)' when technically it isn't and isn't fully criticized to be given a solution to how good the source really is. Think the community needs baby feeding again, maybe release your packet logger for them to log the packets 'if they understand them' enough damage done allready so i don't care what you do. So go ahead if you want to...

Your attitude is why things for CO never progressed much beyond half written servers & poorly wrtten servers. by keeping eerything behind closed doors may give you a sense of grandure but it does nothing for the progression of the private server community.

There might be 1,000,000 people download the source, if 1 of them learnt from it or improves it then its a good thing for the community.

Quote:

Originally Posted by tester Your attitude is why things for CO never progressed much beyond half written servers & poorly wrtten servers. by keeping eerything behind closed doors may give you a sense of grandure but it does nothing for the progression of the private server community. There might be 1,000,000 people download the source, if 1 of them learnt from it or improves it then its a good thing for the community.

Sorry, Who are you?

Quote:

Originally Posted by © Haydz Sorry, Who are you?

I could be confrontional as your seeming to want to think your above me in someway but really Why does it matter?

I used to play CO, I am a member here and at pb i came here a couple of days ago cause someone ask me to setup a private "old style" server for them to grind on. Hope this helps you understand "who i am" :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by tester I could be confrontional as your seeming to want to think your above me in someway but really Why does it matter? I used to play CO, I am a member here and at pb i came here a couple of days ago cause someone ask me to setup a private "old style" server for them to grind on. Hope this helps you understand "who i am" :)

Im just wondering if i know you by any other name.

However the fact that you are criticising his attitude is beyond me. He adapted, like many others that 'attitude' from everyone else in the 'private server community'.

Quote:

Originally Posted by © Haydz Im just wondering if i know you by any other name. However the fact that you are criticising his attitude is beyond me. He adapted, like many others that 'attitude' from everyone else in the 'private server community'.

Its not just the private server community, its the whole CO community. If everyone where to share like a real open source community then you would have full complete servers able to support 100s or 1000s of users by 2 years ago, even the people "in the know" dont share, its a massive criticism of us all, one i expressed a long time ago, its a big factor of the other place is so dead.

Mark shared with anyone who asked yet we all kept it behind closed doors and never shared that information with each other. You have to see that you have strong skills in certain areas and weakness in others, by working together you would be strong in all areas but instead you choose to pick up your ball, take it home with you and lock it in a cupboard so noone else can play with it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by tester Its not just the private server community, its the whole CO community. If everyone where to share like a real open source community then you would have full complete servers able to support 100s or 1000s of users by 2 years ago, even the people "in the know" dont share, its a massive criticism of us all, one i expressed a long time ago, its a big factor of the other place is so dead. Mark shared with anyone who asked yet we all kept it behind closed doors and never shared that information with each other. You have to see that you have strong skills in certain areas and weakness in others, by working together you would be strong in all areas but instead you choose to pick up your ball, take it home with you and lock it in a cupboard so noone else can play with it.

Its good to see we're on the same wavelength, one person not sharing can cause everyone to stop. Im not saying we should just start handing source code out to everyone. I believe in covering each others weaknesses and improving on our own through the help of others, which is needed around here.

Has anyone noticed that deleting an item only works half the time?

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottdavey Has anyone noticed that deleting an item only works half the time?

It works.
The only reason it wouldn't is if there are multiple items with the same UIDs.
(Probably caused from your shopping mall not being coded correctly)

Quote:

Originally Posted by kinshi88 It works. The only reason it wouldn't is if there are multiple items with the same UIDs. (Probably caused from your shopping mall not being coded correctly)

Most likely, someone posted a shopping mall fix so you can buy multiple items, thats the one i'm using.

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottdavey Most likely, someone posted a shopping mall fix so you can buy multiple items, thats the one i'm using.

Yup, its bugged.
That's whats causing it.
Gotta make a new item everytime.

this source dont have like any npcs that work o.o ... i wanna get the reflect and nobility and rb and progress working... didnt anyone already make releases for that? if yes can someone reply with links? plz and ty =)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultimatum Therefore you don't see the bigger picture here. Fact is andy released a source that as the new encryption 'Working'. Look at the total downloads of it... Its was basically given to them, no work just given. Sparkie released it in a entirely diffent way. He distributed it so the end user had to work to get past patch 5017. So sparkie didn't do the same. You basically just gave them it.

You didn't explain how a release with updated encryption has a negative effect on the community, which is what I don't see.

As Andy already noted: I practically handed out the encryption. The only reason I didn't give it out in the same form Andy has done, is because I didn't have my own server to plug it into, nor did I intend to use one of the trainwreck sources on here.

I can't see why this is bad for the comminuty, but I can't really see how it is good for it either. Sure, it's the big thing now, but it isn't going to continue to be up to date and decent quality because nobody else on this forum knows how to code. The patchwork copy&paste development model is never going to work. Sharing is useless because nobody actually really understands the code. Those that do end up renaming things and confusing the fuck out of others, and everyone is branching off in their own direction without concern for compatability.