Changing some visiulas

[zahter55]

Originally Posted by sdefref

U re the *** here

[sdefref]

Originally Posted by RHNbaskan

we can look
with arms tied
to see what data

You have to look inside the img's.
not 01

Have a look at 02 and others

örnek ; 2.5 arsensky2

tüm img ları açıyorum

ondan sonra doğru nesne ile koduna bakıp

onun subject de alıyorum.

bu sayede hızlıca oyuna entegre etmiş oluruz.

2 ci aşama etki aşaması bunun üzerine çalışıyoruz.
obje resmi alsan da etkiler aktif olmuyor

burda 005/002 sunucu img leri düzenlenen kısımlardan

2002370 objesine bakıp orjinal değer ile
fonksiyonu verilecek değerleri yazıp test ediyoruz.

sonuç. etkisiz ilerde çözerim


motion on gdata 02/04
motions objects

On the source road, you change which object you want to touch from the place on 02/05/08

There are issues with effects.


Changing 1 Motion img is not solution

subgroup motion 2370/ 2002370.subject

it needs to shoot 2002370/71/72/73/74(2002370/01/02/03/04/....11/12) subject and motion

it starts there

path to see which ones connect where

sample ; 2.5 mercurysky2

open all img

then look at your code with the correct object

I'm getting its subject as well.

In this way, we can quickly integrate it into the game.

We are working on this, the 2nd stage impact stage.
Effects are not active even if you receive an object image

Here, 005/002 server img is from the parts edited.

Looking at the 2002370 object with the original value
We write the values to give the function and test it.

conclusion. ineffective i will solve it later

lol do You even understand what you wrote?
god stance files are at G03_GDATA\D03_GMOTION\001 folder

and if you lose the motion file for stance... > client crash

[hapciuu]

Originally Posted by sdefref

wow looks nice

[sdefref]

Originally Posted by qq58801017

nothing special... 2.0 and 1.0 is same client/structure
You can get anything from 2.0 -> 1.0 or 1.0 -> 2.0
Same client, different visuals...

[sdefref]

Originally Posted by qq58801017

You can't find these models in 2.0 or 1.0
Because this 2.5 converted
weapon is custom made

if you say so, but still nothing special.
I don't see the point taking 2.5 visuals in to 1.0

why not then work with 2.5 and save yourself with this trouble

that thing just ruins classic game

[qq58801017]

Originally Posted by sdefref

if you say so, but still nothing special.
I don't see the point taking 2.5 visuals in to 1.0

why not then work with 2.5 and save yourself with this trouble

that thing just ruins classic game

1.0->2.0->2.5 is an evolutionary process
That's how the game developed
We are discussing the process of improving the model format and animation
It is also a process of enjoyment
Not a process of destroying classics
I thought we could discuss the possibility of Technology
But I found that you just want to win by mouth, not by discussing the possibilities
I will stop replying and posting now
Because it's boring

[sdefref]

Originally Posted by qq58801017

1.0->2.0->2.5 is an evolutionary process
That's how the game developed
We are discussing the process of improving the model format and animation
It is also a process of enjoyment
Not a process of destroying classics
I thought we could discuss the possibility of Technology
But I found that you just want to win by mouth, not by discussing the possibilities
I will stop replying and posting now
Because it's boring

1.0->2.0->2.5 is an evolutionary process
I do know what evolution is and how it works, thats not what I'm talking about...

We are discussing the process of improving the model format and animation
Thats not improvement when taking 2.0 or 2.5 models in to 1.0 buddy, thats copy/paste.

It is also a process of enjoyment
Never told you to stop, do as you please.

Not a process of destroying classics
Taking 2.0 or 2.5 models in to 1.0 that isn't meant for 1.0 is ruining the game, think how ever you want.

I will stop replying and posting now Because it's boring
If that suits you, go for it.