[Release] Kick Vote Reaktivierung

[Artix789]

Working Fine !

Thx

[RingleRangleRob]

Originally Posted by royalframe89

I have problem how to use ?

Cheat Engine.

Activate the Script for open Kick Vote.

[*-Ducky]

Pretty sick it works perfectly on win 8 64 bit

[DrogenKinder]

Useless. They will reactivate it soon anyway.

[RingleRangleRob]

Originally Posted by DrogenKinder

Useless. They will reactivate it soon anyway.

You're mad ?
why people should play without it ?

They will reactivate it soon anyway.

They are stupid because they remove the button. The Idea to remove it because the noob leecher kick hacks working with it is also stupid.

Your comment is also useless because it is for the time if it isn't there.

[PsychoXReaper]

Originally Posted by [F]aze

They are stupid because they remove the button. The Idea to remove it because the noob leecher kick hacks working with it is also stupid.

the button is removed therefore whoever sends a vote kick request is a hacker obv
and i thought they already "patched" exetra's leaked dll

[onahoe]

Originally Posted by [F]aze

You're mad ?
why people should play without it ?



They are stupid because they remove the button. The Idea to remove it because the noob leecher kick hacks working with it is also stupid.

Your comment is also useless because it is for the time if it isn't there.

Why should they do it, when they could get banned for using it? Also, just call it by yourself. It is very uncomfortable to use a CE script, because you need to have a bypass. Calling it would be undetected & much cleaner (if you use function pointers and not using threads with asm in them..)

[RingleRangleRob]

Originally Posted by PsychoXReaper

the button is removed therefore whoever sends a vote kick request is a hacker obv
and i thought they already "patched" exetra's leaked dll

but they build checks into the kick function ( started and master ) and you can't open the Kick Window in the lobby so it's impossible to kick someone for the people with the dll.

They are stupid. Look in S4Client you will see 3 / 8 or more crap parts that isn't used or useless.

Originally Posted by onahoe

Why should they do it, when they could get banned for using it? Also, just call it by yourself. It is very uncomfortable to use a CE script, because you need to have a bypass. Calling it would be undetected & much cleaner (if you use function pointers and not using threads with asm in them..)

Nobody can't know who kick the people. Everbody in the room can call this function with the id.
Ofc you are right it is uncomfortable to use a CE Script.

Yes Dll is better and i am working on it but at least i get much crash's and stop for short time working at it.

So i am working on it please wait

[Neyil]

Originally Posted by PsychoXReaper

the button is removed therefore whoever sends a vote kick request is a hacker obv
and i thought they already "patched" exetra's leaked dll

well, people reversed that dll and shared the info with everyone else.. the method using the room master is patched for now they said..

[onahoe]

Originally Posted by [F]aze

but they build checks into the kick function ( started and master ) and you can't open the Kick Window in the lobby so it's impossible to kick someone for the people with the dll. .

wrong.

[Neyil]

Originally Posted by onahoe

wrong.

Don't say wrong unless you have proofs.

[onahoe]

Originally Posted by Neyil

Don't say wrong unless you have proofs.

Don't say there are checks in the function until you have proofs. The checks are serversided, because it will not work by sending the kick packets too.

[Neyil]

Thanks captain obvious, we already know this.. move on. Next time when we say checks and patches.. it's safe to assume that we mean serversided because if it was client sided it wouldn't be patched

[RingleRangleRob]

Originally Posted by onahoe

wrong.

how would you open the kick vote menu with the kick dll and nothing else into the lobby ? pls explain sensei

Originally Posted by onahoe

Don't say there are checks in the function until you have proofs. The checks are serversided, because it will not work by sending the kick packets too.

read on the first page of this thread i already sayed that these checks are serversided.

[onahoe]

Originally Posted by Neyil

it's safe to assume that we mean serversided because if it was client sided it wouldn't be patched

it's safe to assume that you don't mean serversided, because you are leechers and repeating what other people said.