1 Day Spoofer - Question

[StafaNNN]

Looking to buy a one-day spoofer for Rust to test functionality after being flagged by Cerberus. Interested in working versions that do not affect game performance or compromise system stability.

[Versexe]

Hello friend,

Starting with a short-term option to test is a solid approach.

For EAC Rust, Reported and Sync are your best choices for reliable testing.

Other temporary spoofers are, (respectfully) questionable on Rust, in my personal opinion.

We are official Reported verified resellers, offering alternative payment methods and direct ticket support. Feel free to open a ticket if you need more details or guidance on the product.

Please note that neither options offers a one-day plan. Our duration start at 7 days, and the spoofer doe not impact game performance or compromise system stability.

[StafaNNN]

Originally Posted by Versexe

Hello friend,

Starting with a short-term option to test is a solid approach.

For EAC Rust, Reported and Sync are your best choices for reliable testing.

Other temporary spoofers are, (respectfully) questionable on Rust, in my personal opinion.

We are official Reported verified resellers, offering alternative payment methods and direct ticket support. Feel free to open a ticket if you need more details or guidance on the product.

Please note that neither options offers a one-day plan. Our duration start at 7 days, and the spoofer doe not impact game performance or compromise system stability.

For your spoofer i need to disable TPM from bios?

[SauceMachine]

Originally Posted by StafaNNN

For your spoofer i need to disable TPM from bios?

No, Verse temp will spoof tpm.

[Cheesy's Products]

Originally Posted by StafaNNN

Looking to buy a one-day spoofer for Rust to test functionality after being flagged by Cerberus. Interested in working versions that do not affect game performance or compromise system stability.

are you looking for temp or perm? we offer a perm 1 time spoof and also lifetime and it perm changes the hwid on ur system and also is working for all eac/be games and vanguard

[GarboVoid]

Originally Posted by StafaNNN

Looking to buy a one-day spoofer for Rust to test functionality after being flagged by Cerberus. Interested in working versions that do not affect game performance or compromise system stability.

Our permanent spoofer comes with a DISK/GPU/ARP spoofer, which gets u unbanned on RUST just like a Temp spoofer, at a much affordable price

[joaophillipdev]

i recommend stealthvm.lol, the best alternative to the reported one.

any other spoofer other than reported.lol and stealthvm.lol will definitely be detected and is a scam.
stealthvm has a much better price than reported, is much more affordable, and offers the same quality as reported.

[astroware]

Originally Posted by GarboVoid

Our permanent spoofer comes with a DISK/GPU/ARP spoofer, which gets u unbanned on RUST just like a Temp spoofer, at a much affordable price

you my friend shouldn't be advertising your garbage here anymore, countless people came out with their motherboard bricked due to your **** spoofer.

[SauceMachine]

Originally Posted by joaophillipdev

i recommend stealthvm.lol, the best alternative to the reported one.

any other spoofer other than reported.lol and stealthvm.lol will definitely be detected and is a scam.
stealthvm has a much better price than reported, is much more affordable, and offers the same quality as reported.

I'm curious... How can you claim "same quality as Reported" when you don’t know what Reported actually looks like under the hood? Such statements without technical insight is just marketing.

[GarboVoid]

Originally Posted by astroware

you my friend shouldn't be advertising your garbage here anymore, countless people came out with their motherboard bricked due to your **** spoofer.

I mean, theoretically explain how that works to me? How does someone *brick* a motherboard with a permanent spoofer?

Funny enough, we have a smBIOS fixer for users who tried bad **** and we fix their smBIOS tables.

[joaophillipdev]

Originally Posted by SauceMachine

I'm curious... How can you claim "same quality as Reported" when you don’t know what Reported actually looks like under the hood? Such statements without technical insight is just marketing.

Fair question. When I say “same quality,” I mean not that I know what's going on in Reported's internal code, but rather that I'm talking about practical results and behavior, not assumptions.

By all testing and user feedback, StealthVM stands toe-to-toe with Reported in the areas that count: detection rate, stability, consistency over time, and how it behaves against common checks.

If two solutions, for identical circumstances, produce the same real-world results, it's reasonable to compare their functional quality, even if the internal implementations are different.

This is not marketing; it is based on usage, testing, and results.

[theminkman]

Originally Posted by SauceMachine

I'm curious... How can you claim "same quality as Reported" when you don’t know what Reported actually looks like under the hood? Such statements without technical insight is just marketing.

Probably by the experience of cheating and using spoofers, I'd assume anyways

[alexpsp00]

Originally Posted by joaophillipdev

Fair question. When I say “same quality,” I mean not that I know what's going on in Reported's internal code, but rather that I'm talking about practical results and behavior, not assumptions.

By all testing and user feedback, StealthVM stands toe-to-toe with Reported in the areas that count: detection rate, stability, consistency over time, and how it behaves against common checks.

If two solutions, for identical circumstances, produce the same real-world results, it's reasonable to compare their functional quality, even if the internal implementations are different.

This is not marketing; it is based on usage, testing, and results.

thanks chatgpt

[SauceMachine]

Originally Posted by joaophillipdev

Fair question. When I say “same quality,” I mean not that I know what's going on in Reported's internal code, but rather that I'm talking about practical results and behavior, not assumptions.

By all testing and user feedback, StealthVM stands toe-to-toe with Reported in the areas that count: detection rate, stability, consistency over time, and how it behaves against common checks.

If two solutions, for identical circumstances, produce the same real-world results, it's reasonable to compare their functional quality, even if the internal implementations are different.

This is not marketing; it is based on usage, testing, and results.

I'm not even going to bother responding to this lsd tripping gpt nonsense.

[joaophillipdev]

Originally Posted by SauceMachine

I'm not even going to bother responding to this lsd tripping gpt nonsense.

btw -rep reported.lol so detected for fn actually