Ring-1 R6 opinion

[Faw_one]

Hi guys I want some opinions about Ring-1 because im looking for a cheat to do legit hacking without detections . Heard good things about Ring-1 but wanna know opinions about Ring-1 and other cheats. TY

[DuckFuq]

Originally Posted by Faw_one

Hi guys I want some opinions about Ring-1 because im looking for a cheat to do legit hacking without detections . Heard good things about Ring-1 but wanna know opinions about Ring-1 and other cheats. TY

not worth it unless you want a ban, try yazzen, hackmachine or elusion, some of them may be down/detected right now but they can go few months or a year at a time without detections

[Relentless]

Originally Posted by DuckFuq

not worth it unless you want a ban, try yazzen, hackmachine or elusion, some of them may be down/detected right now but they can go few months or a year at a time without detections

This isn’t true, even though I myself don’t like Ring1 they have never been DTC for R6. But if security is your main goal go with HM, currently the best private cheat for R6. Elusion is no longer a thing for r6 and yazzn is public.

[sietseiscool1]

are they never detected before ? because their site say's the same sht about EFT yet im 100 percent sure we had a bann wave a couple of years ago. so i dont really trust ring-1.

Also if their R6 cheat is never detected before than hackmachine is not the best cheese security wise. its clearly ring-1 than.

but i highly doubt its never been detected before

[DuckFuq]

Originally Posted by Relentless0x7

This isn’t true, even though I myself don’t like Ring1 they have never been DTC for R6. But if security is your main goal go with HM, currently the best private cheat for R6. Elusion is no longer a thing for r6 and yazzn is public.

stop sniffing glue sticks, its bad for you

[Relentless]

Originally Posted by DuckFuq

stop sniffing glue sticks, its bad for you

?

Originally Posted by sietseiscool1

are they never detected before ? because their site say's the same sht about EFT yet im 100 percent sure we had a bann wave a couple of years ago. so i dont really trust ring-1.

Also if their R6 cheat is never detected before than hackmachine is not the best cheese security wise. its clearly ring-1 than.

but i highly doubt its never been detected before

eft has had dtcs, they lie about all dtcs other than R6. R6 is like their only game that is UD
Id jsut recommend staying away from ring1 its utter ****

[UTF69]

Ring-1 R6 is completely detected. Hackmachine no longer supports R6s and HM got detected every 4month~9month before they ended support.

[Neraz1m]

Originally Posted by UTF69

Ring-1 R6 is completely detected. Hackmachine no longer supports R6s and HM got detected every 4month~9month before they ended support.

I think only some feature(s) got detected. If it is completely detected, why are there still ring-1 users that didn't get banned yet? Either you are lying or they are lying. IDK.

[aruissi]

Some features of ring-1 are sometimes detected be cautious of using things of using in the misc tab but overall its a good legit cheat


Also the reason for recent bans was the spoofer, or using detected features in misc tab

[UTF69]

Originally Posted by Neraz1m

I think only some feature(s) got detected. If it is completely detected, why are there still ring-1 users that didn't get banned yet? Either you are lying or they are lying. IDK.

Why does Battleye have to ban Ring-1 users simultaneously and all at once? In that case, Ring-1 will have to find new vulnerabilities, and Battleye will have to waste time finding them as well. This isn't just my opinion; it's something a Vanguard anti-cheat engineer actually said. You can find his interview video on YouTube.

All bans are randomly delayed. And Battleye has various modules that are streamed and loaded onto the system during gameplay. Some Ring-1 users might have a module detecting Hypervisor loaded, while others might have one that detects DMA. In this scenario, the user with the Hypervisor detection module loaded is more likely to get banned first. Therefore, the fact that some Ring-1 users haven't been banned yet and the claim that Ring-1 cheats are undetectable are entirely different things.

Statements like 'only some features are detected,' 'your ban was a manual ban,' or 'high stats guarantee a ban' are not excuses for users using trash like Ring-1. In fact, I have a friend who has been using a DMA device since Operation Health. His headshot rate is close to 60%, but he hasn't been banned


Can something like this be done with Ring-1? Of course not. So, what's the difference between DMA and Ring-1? One is undetectable, and the other is detectable. I don't know how you understand the term 'completely detectable,' but the vastly different results between truly undetectable DMA and detectable Ring-1 are proof of this. Whether you rage cheat or closet cheat, use only safe features or not with Ring-1, I guarantee you'll be banned within 2-3 months. If you're going to get banned within 2-3 months, why closet cheat at all?

[Neraz1m]

Originally Posted by UTF69

Why does Battleye have to ban Ring-1 users simultaneously and all at once? In that case, Ring-1 will have to find new vulnerabilities, and Battleye will have to waste time finding them as well. This isn't just my opinion; it's something a Vanguard anti-cheat engineer actually said. You can find his interview video on YouTube.

All bans are randomly delayed. And Battleye has various modules that are streamed and loaded onto the system during gameplay. Some Ring-1 users might have a module detecting Hypervisor loaded, while others might have one that detects DMA. In this scenario, the user with the Hypervisor detection module loaded is more likely to get banned first. Therefore, the fact that some Ring-1 users haven't been banned yet and the claim that Ring-1 cheats are undetectable are entirely different things.

Yeah this might be but not using/loading hypervisor detection routines on every user's PC is extremely bad. I don't think BE does that.

[Cheesy's Products]

Originally Posted by Faw_one

Hi guys I want some opinions about Ring-1 because im looking for a cheat to do legit hacking without detections . Heard good things about Ring-1 but wanna know opinions about Ring-1 and other cheats. TY

its the best cheat currently

[overhead1752]

Originally Posted by UTF69

Why does Battleye have to ban Ring-1 users simultaneously and all at once? In that case, Ring-1 will have to find new vulnerabilities, and Battleye will have to waste time finding them as well. This isn't just my opinion; it's something a Vanguard anti-cheat engineer actually said. You can find his interview video on YouTube.

All bans are randomly delayed. And Battleye has various modules that are streamed and loaded onto the system during gameplay. Some Ring-1 users might have a module detecting Hypervisor loaded, while others might have one that detects DMA. In this scenario, the user with the Hypervisor detection module loaded is more likely to get banned first. Therefore, the fact that some Ring-1 users haven't been banned yet and the claim that Ring-1 cheats are undetectable are entirely different things.

Statements like 'only some features are detected,' 'your ban was a manual ban,' or 'high stats guarantee a ban' are not excuses for users using trash like Ring-1. In fact, I have a friend who has been using a DMA device since Operation Health. His headshot rate is close to 60%, but he hasn't been banned


Can something like this be done with Ring-1? Of course not. So, what's the difference between DMA and Ring-1? One is undetectable, and the other is detectable. I don't know how you understand the term 'completely detectable,' but the vastly different results between truly undetectable DMA and detectable Ring-1 are proof of this. Whether you rage cheat or closet cheat, use only safe features or not with Ring-1, I guarantee you'll be banned within 2-3 months. If you're going to get banned within 2-3 months, why closet cheat at all?

dma is detectable? what is that comment?

[wilvin0]

Avoid at all costs ))

[Abagnale]

They got detected recently but R1 is not a bad option