Weaving .Dll or other program?

[KojiroKage]

Well, I'm going to be needing something to help me through rank 8 of weaving, and have been looking for a .dll or other program that will gaurantee making finest silks/fabrics. I haven't had any luck so far, so I've come to request one, or have someone clarify if such a thing even exists.

Thanks~

[inusuka]

Originally Posted by KojiroKage

Well, I'm going to be needing something to help me through rank 8 of weaving, and have been looking for a .dll or other program that will gaurantee making finest silks/fabrics. I haven't had any luck so far, so I've come to request one, or have someone clarify if such a thing even exists.

Thanks~

leecher newb ish newb :O

[Halfslashed]

Impossible.

Silk success rates are calculated server side.

The best you could do was modify the success rate to never fail at weaving, but there is no guarantee that would work.

[darkpower5]

i remember there was one for refine and i think you can packet edit for tailoring but its easy to trace they might be some old threads about this try searching it

[Halfslashed]

Refining is very impractical, as there is no success rate call.

For tailoring, we have twintail.

[AKB990]

Originally Posted by Halfslashed

Refining is very impractical, as there is no success rate call.

For tailoring, we have twintail.

Which mostly gives B+ material.

[inusuka]

Originally Posted by Halfslashed

Refining is very impractical, as there is no success rate call.

For tailoring, we have twintail.

and for twintail we has bypass o.O

[Halfslashed]

Or included in an IJL patcher

[Uncreative.]

Even if it was possible, you wouldn't be getting it.

[Halfslashed]

But I made it :O

[Uncreative.]

I was talking to the OP, not you. Lol

However, I still believe that there might be a refining or weaving "hack" possible, considering I or anyone else ever looked into the packets of Weaving and Refining and the such..

[tbstewa]

eeeeeeewwwww packets :S

[Halfslashed]

Originally Posted by tbstewa

eeeeeeewwwww packets :S

Ewwww indeed.

[pawntobishop]

It's odd how the packets for these things work, fishing for example, when auto fish is used, the packet that is received is the same for both a fail and a success, which denotes that the determining factor is client sided based on whether a packet is received, correct?
So to see if this kind of edit is possible via a .dll modification we should first check to see if a different packet is sent for success/failure.

[inusuka]

Originally Posted by tbstewa

eeeeeeewwwww packets :S

nothing wrong with packets. packets helped invent range dll and 1 charge fireball