ilubtina

[Aka.]

Originally Posted by Daiisama

Definitely. Because I'm obviously the one spouting retarded theories at people who are vastly more knowledgeable. By the way, I like how you're not responding to Checkbox. Scared he's going to show everyone how little you actually know?

I have no intention of fixing pake, nor do I think it should be public again.
If I wanted it, you really believe I couldn't get it? I can be spoon fed just as much as you can.

Also, if there is no import/export symbols, patchers will fail. If you add them back in, well, the obvious solution is it would work, no?

Also, on another note

[Daiisama]

Originally Posted by Aka.

I have no intention of fixing pake, nor do I think it should be public again.
If I wanted it, you really believe I couldn't get it? I can be spoon fed just as much as you can.

Also, if there is no import/export symbols, patchers will fail. If you add them back in, well, the obvious solution is it would work, no?

Also, on another note

Pfft. I'm clearly the ultimate leecher, and I don't even have it. My spoon is way bigger than yours. I'm pretty sure someone even said so somewhere on here.
You couldn't fix pake anyway, it's why you have no intention of fixing it.

No. It wouldn't.

**** your pony.

[Kevsprk]

I don't think you could get it at this point. A single person has managed to fix it (Checkbox) and you wont be getting that. Challenge accepted?

[Daiisama]

Originally Posted by Kevsprk

I don't think you could get it at this point. A single person has managed to fix it (Checkbox) and you wont be getting that. Challenge accepted?

Oh. Hey, Kev. How's it going? Iunno. Aka says he could leech it. Kid supposedly leeched statuses before anyone in Martyr even had them. At least, that's what he told me. He has mad skills, man.

[adam_j]

Originally Posted by Kevsprk

I don't think you could get it at this point. A single person has managed to fix it (Checkbox) and you wont be getting that. Challenge accepted?

Does it count as leeching if they wait for an official Pake update?

[Kevsprk]

>:[ No, at this current point in time

[Aka.]

Originally Posted by Daiisama

Oh. Hey, Kev. How's it going? Iunno. Aka says he could leech it. Kid supposedly leeched statuses before anyone in Martyr even had them. At least, that's what he told me. He has mad skills, man.

You apparently are mad if you're going to lie all the time, I've never once spoken to you in private message or mabinogi.

Also, Kev, He must have leaked it a fair bit then, I mean, seriously, look at this threads OP, that dupe was so checkbox fixed mabipake and client.

Fkingteachmeyourwaysestevan

[Checkbox]

When I wrote my , there actually was no ill intent. I felt others were making premature assumptions based on a so I thought it would've been good to get an opinion from you.

I figured you would've said something like "no basis, I'm just trying things I would think would work" which I would've supported because regardless of whether you succeeded or failed, you would've learned a lot in the process. Alternatively, I would've disputed anything I know to be incorrect. There's nothing wrong with people trying things they consider hunches, but it does becomes a problem when others treat those hunches as real solutions. Nothing personal to you, it's just me doing what I've usually done.

While you were responding to a provocation, I'm still compelled to correct your information. Please take no offense.

Originally Posted by Aka.

I have no intention of fixing pake, nor do I think it should be public again.

Originally Posted by Aka.

Me? r102 will be out soon, so this gives you all time to not be lazy, google some stuff, add the import/export symbols back and after that abuse pake until r102

If there was a more recent comment that stated you no longer had any interest in fixing pake, please link to it. I, along with others, were under the impression you were still working on fixing it.

Originally Posted by Aka.

If I wanted it, you really believe I couldn't get it? I can be spoon fed just as much as you can.

If you were to get it, it would be due to your own work. I don't believe the option is available to you to get it from anyone else as no one other than myself has been willing to make any real claims they have things working but if you happen to know private modders who do have things working, please have them hit me up. I'm think there would be a mutual interest in the both of us confirming that the other party has fixed things.

While I rather not get involved in whatever is going on between you and Daisama, I will say that he is more privy to higher quality information than most people. That can be backed by researching his activities on the Nexon forums (at least the old forums).

Originally Posted by Aka.

Also, if there is no import/export symbols, patchers will fail. If you add them back in, well, the obvious solution is it would work, no?

No. At best, it would patch but it would have no effect as the affected code will not be executed. Take another look at the unpacked client to understand why. It also brings up another question- have you been able to log in with an unpacked client? I have not (my unpack doesn't even run), the only worth an unpacked client had for me was as something to throw into IDA for analysis.

For me, the merit in seeing how other people are progressing in this is to find if they take approaches that differ from mine. I don't want to tell you to stop, but I do believe you should do further research before continuing if "If you add them back in, well, the obvious solution is it would work" is your basis for believing what you are doing will work.

Originally Posted by Aka.

Also, on another note

The appropriate reaction is disappointment. For the amount of serious work you did in research, you could've gone without saying-

Originally Posted by Aka.

If I wanted it, you really believe I couldn't get it? I can be spoon fed just as much as you can.

Originally Posted by Aka.

Also, Kev, He must have leaked it a fair bit then, I mean, seriously, look at this threads OP, that dupe was so checkbox fixed mabipake and client.

I don't know what your comment means but there wasn't enough information in the video to definitely conclude it was pake.

harrybong1 also gave . It's not really important if it's credible as it doesn't change that the video doesn't show that the user was using pake. At this point, with so many people having been exposed to pake over such a long period of time, I don't think I am alone in this conclusion.

[Venlik]

It's hardly Trolling if what he says is true, plus this was more of a rebuttal.
Re-think your definition of "Troll" ...

Nice, i see you removed your post Jas... GG

[Aka.]

Originally Posted by Checkbox

No. At best, it would patch but it would have no effect as the affected code will not be executed. Take another look at the unpacked client to understand why. It also brings up another question- have you been able to log in with an unpacked client? I have not (my unpack doesn't even run), the only worth an unpacked client had for me was as something to throw into IDA for analysis.

I can login to the unpacked client just fine?
I haven't bothered unpacking v102, though.
But if you want to login with it, you have to use a VM with Windows XP, and it should be fine.

Originally Posted by Checkbox

I don't know what your comment means but there wasn't enough information in the video to definitely conclude it was pake.

You kiddin, that was so pake. He even said so himself(But told others it was a glitch, and a few others it was just temp inventory).

I have tried some stuff, even unpacked the client, but it isn't worth wasting my time, Skitty said you worked on it for three or four days, was it?
I'm no match compared to you, CheckBox, so this entire argument I'll hand to you. You're a genius when it comes to this, and I can admit it. If it took you three or four days, it would take me a couple weeks or more.

[Daiisama]

Originally Posted by Aka.

I can login to the unpacked client just fine?
I haven't bothered unpacking v102, though.
But if you want to login with it, you have to use a VM with Windows XP, and it should be fine.

You kiddin, that was so pake. He even said so himself(But told others it was a glitch, and a few others it was just temp inventory).

I have tried some stuff, even unpacked the client, but it isn't worth wasting my time, Skitty said you worked on it for three or four days, was it?
I'm no match compared to you, CheckBox, so this entire argument I'll hand to you. You're a genius when it comes to this, and I can admit it. If it took you three or four days, it would take me a couple weeks or more.

Wow. Holy ****. It's a Diglett. Tell me if you reach china.

[Aka.]

Originally Posted by Daiisama

Wow. Holy ****. It's a Diglett. Tell me when you reach china.

I don't know why you're so **** hurt over me, do you mind explaining this, anyway?

No, no. You're just the average 15(16 now?) year old that sounds like a 12 year old on mic with his skype group.

[Daiisama]

Originally Posted by Aka.

I don't know why you're so **** hurt over me, do you mind explaining this, anyway?

No, no. You're just the average 15(16 now?) year old that sounds like a 12 year old on mic with his skype group.

You irritate me, for a number of reasons. Most of all, I dislike you taking credit for my friends work, though you've kept your claims private for the most part. To gain reputation, I'm guessing. It still irritates me. Many other reasons. As I recall, you started talking **** to me first. I can be pretty petty about that kind of thing, when it suits me anyway.

Are you calling me average or my voice? Either way, ouch.

You should keep digging your hole, man.

Why the question, btw? It's not like you have so many endearing qualities that you can't figure it out yourself.

[Aka.]

Originally Posted by Daiisama

You irritate me, for a number of reasons. Most of all, I dislike you taking credit for my friends work, though you've kept your claims private for the most part. To gain reputation, I'm guessing. It still irritates me. Many other reasons. As I recall, you started talking **** to me first. I can be pretty petty about that kind of thing, when it suits me anyway.

Are you calling me average or my voice? Either way, ouch.

You should keep digging your hole, man.

Why the question, btw? It's not like you have so many endearing qualities that you can't figure it out yourself.

First off: I've never claimed credit to any mod/packets/anything that I didn't create or find, name one please?

Secondly, I'm not digging a hole? Saying you can run the unpacked client is digging when it is true? Hmm, could have fooled me.

Thirdly, I've never talked **** about you once, you are the one who has talked **** about me in numerous posts and people.

Dragon chests: I did not find, it was found long before I had access to it.
GM Panel: This is pretty old, I don't even know who found this.
Status effects: Well, it should be obvious that I did not find this.
Rebirth: I never claimed this either.
Secret Inventory: Still no.
Pet Teleporting: Nope, still.
Any name for characters: Nop.
Duping: Still saying no here.
Update skip: Nop, but I did make a module for it before, but so did Marck after a while.
And a ton of other **** I did not find.
Overall, whoever is feeding you information, is in-correct or you're just lying like you did about me saying I found status effects, or whatever the hell you said a few posts back.

[jas161]

Originally Posted by Venlik

It's hardly Trolling if what he says is true, plus this was more of a rebuttal.
Re-think your definition of "Troll" ...

Nice, i see you removed your post Jas... GG

Yea I just read his a bit more, although my point is still valid in other instances.