professional/packet bots?

[eliteacc7]

hi everyone, im a long time botter in darkorbit and i used alot of the old tools such as pbdo, ibot/kbot, kerkava... . Recently i wanted to hop back on the botting train but i cant find anything proper. I come across some very decent projects such as s-bot and fsbot, kudos to the developers but pixel bots just dont have the performance im looking for.

They lack both precision and speed, since you dont forge the in game command and directly send it to the server its prone to alot of glitches, if the color values on the images used for comparison is slightly off it doesnt work, also it forces you to keep and actual browser open which eats up alot of recources. The most important thing however is the lack of complex features, no pre-detection of npcs, very slow reaction time when collecting boxes or targeting npc's ( 3x slower than me doing it :/ ), no decent circling, very annoying manual sleep times which can change due to misses and ends up killing you... it just goes on.

the sad part is no matter how good of a programmer you are the problem lies in the core structure of the program, I hope we get a proper packet bot soon.

Finally i know what you guys are gonna say, "why dont u do it u sk" , im just not that good yet but ill try to support the developers.

[kuilis911]

There is packet bot - Merkava. I got ban 2 days ago. Good luck.

[MrCriticalRx]

two bots

Golem---> two mode , for pixel or for packet

NanoBot----> This bot is a pixel bot but in BackGround in my opinion the best bot in this types

Lucky

[721560329]

Originally Posted by MrCriticalRx

two bots

Golem---> two mode , for pixel or for packet

NanoBot----> This bot is a pixel bot but in BackGround in my opinion the best bot in this types

Lucky

golem dont use packets but flash injection instead (if im not mistaking)

and dont even start with "best pixelbot is this" cause it will turn into another thread where people will fight what is batter pixel bot..

[MrCriticalRx]

Originally Posted by 721560329

golem dont use packets but flash injection instead (if im not mistaking)

and dont even start with "best pixelbot is this" cause it will turn into another thread where people will fight what is batter pixel bot..

any way

[benk980]

Originally Posted by 721560329

golem dont use packets but flash injection instead (if im not mistaking)

and dont even start with "best pixelbot is this" cause it will turn into another thread where people will fight what is batter pixel bot..

Golem bot has an option for packets in settings>advanced

[.Gatekeeper.]

Golem is the what you're looking for, especially if you're looking to npc bot

[skeith_sk8]

There is a way to make proper pixelbots, more likely candy than the current ones.... But, at least me, i dont have enough programming knowledge to do that.

If you expect a good packetbit you should think why pbdo, kbot,ibot, merkavaBot and so on dissapeared. They were very good programmers, but the new bp anticheat system for them is also good.
You can use golem or merkava, but your ban chance is very high (while using packets, golem has pixel functions).
The current pixel bots are not as bad, you can get high ammounts of uri if you set your PI and so on average, but yes, its nothing compared with the old times, especially on npc killer jajajaja

Sincirely, forget old times, that ended 3 years ago, and it will not come again

[YatoDev]

Originally Posted by eliteacc7

the sad part is no matter how good of a programmer you are the problem lies in the core structure of the program which is relying on client side functions such as analyzing the screen ( i call it pixelling ) or trying to emulate a mouse instead of directly communicating with the server.

You have a lack of knowledge. Dont talk about topics you dont know about.

The programmer is always the bottleneck.

And also current pixel bot's in this forum are quite bad

[Diаmonds]

Originally Posted by »FlutterShy™

You have a lack of knowledge. Dont talk about topics you dont know about.

The programmer is always the bottleneck.

And also current pixel bot's in this forum are quite bad

The programmer is the bottleneck when packet bots could lock NPCs from outside the screen and pixel bots can't? Please.

[AliG-DO]

What stops you from making your screen bigger then? :P Idk why no one takes advantage of broken 2D mode and resize game to see more.

[Diаmonds]

Originally Posted by AliG-DO

What stops you from making your screen bigger then? :P Idk why no one takes advantage of broken 2D mode and resize game to see more.

That works but it consumes more ressources and it takes more time to scan the whole screen.
Making the window bigger might actually make the bot run slower on (really) bad computers...

[YatoDev]

Originally Posted by AliG-DO

What stops you from making your screen bigger then? :P Idk why no one takes advantage of broken 2D mode and resize game to see more.

Originally Posted by Diаmonds

That works but it consumes more ressources and it takes more time to scan the whole screen.
Making the window bigger might actually make the bot run slower on (really) bad computers...

you can zoom in and out in both, 2d and 3d mode.

does not take more ressources and makes search pics smaller. and you have the same range as a packet bot would have

[brouhaha]

Originally Posted by »FlutterShy™

you can zoom in and out in both, 2d and 3d mode.

does not take more ressources and makes search pics smaller. and you have the same range as a packet bot would have

browser/version?

[AliG-DO]

If you zoom out in 3D mode it rescales everything as far as I noticed, so you don't actually see more. 2D on the other hand just expands your field of view.
Get Chrome (if you're making bot then look into CEF, if C# then CefSharp.Offscreen), go in 2D mode to map, hold ctrl and use mouse scroll.