|
You last visited: Today at 14:33
Advertisement
Best 'classic' source?
Discussion on Best 'classic' source? within the CO2 Private Server forum part of the Conquer Online 2 category.
03/25/2011, 04:25
|
#1
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 145
Received Thanks: 36
|
Best 'classic' source?
So, what's the best source out there for a classic server (pre-potency at least)? I'm looking for a clean, organized source that best mimics the official Conquer pre-potency clients.
|
|
|
03/25/2011, 05:29
|
#2
|
elite*gold: 80
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 642
Received Thanks: 168
|
The one you make.
|
|
|
03/25/2011, 05:52
|
#3
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,892
Received Thanks: 920
|
Mine. Though it's not finished.
It's as close to v4267 (1.0) as it gets.
Edit: My bad. My source isn't public. I don't think there are many well-developed sources for early client versions besides a few, and the ones that are available are just bases.
|
|
|
03/25/2011, 06:20
|
#4
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 145
Received Thanks: 36
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StarBucks
The one you make.
|
Duh.
@Above
Which base would you recommend though? I don't have the time to start from scratch nor the knowledge to be able to code all the base stuff (packets etc.). C# or C++ are both fine but I just want the most organized one D:.
|
|
|
03/25/2011, 07:26
|
#5
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,892
Received Thanks: 920
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wsuo
Duh.
@Above
Which base would you recommend though? I don't have the time to start from scratch nor the knowledge to be able to code all the base stuff (packets etc.). C# or C++ are both fine but I just want the most organized one D:.
|
Get Korvacs' source. It was open source to the underground members, but he released it because of lack of interest. Of course, you could always downgrade a server on a higher patch... But it's a ***** to do. My server is actually based on Hybrid's source (5130?), but I've commented nearly every single line to where I understand it and can work with it easily, which is a must if you're planning on using someone's source.
|
|
|
03/25/2011, 11:56
|
#6
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 237
Received Thanks: 99
|
I use LOTF, put almost a year of work into it... now its decent.
edit: with decent i mean can be hosted on a 200$ netbook (512mb ram 900mhz cpu)
Had about 67 ppl online at most but didnt lag or **** ram usage was at 45 MB CPU 0-2%
|
|
|
03/25/2011, 12:42
|
#7
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 145
Received Thanks: 36
|
Yeah, gonna look for a LOTF source and study it a bit.
|
|
|
03/25/2011, 12:44
|
#8
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,162
Received Thanks: 370
|
With LOTF he mean LOTF 5017.
|
|
|
03/25/2011, 13:00
|
#9
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 237
Received Thanks: 99
|
the ONLY source wich is actually called LOTF is the 5017 one. His other sources are called
TheCoServer(4531), Co Est X(5017), NewestCoServer(5119), NewestCoServer v2(5165).
|
|
|
03/25/2011, 13:52
|
#10
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,162
Received Thanks: 370
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by |NeoX
the ONLY source wich is actually called LOTF is the 5017 one. His other sources are called
TheCoServer(4531), Co Est X(5017), NewestCoServer(5119), NewestCoServer v2(5165).
|
I know, but peoples are stilling calling the others LOTF.
|
|
|
03/25/2011, 13:59
|
#11
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 145
Received Thanks: 36
|
Yeah I know, I'm using a clean (well I think it's the original clean one) 5017 LOTF source. I guess it's pretty straightforward and doesn't have much in it, will see if I have the time/am bothered to fix it all up T_T.
I just want to create a 1.0-like server.
EDIT: Geez... Way too much to do lol. Guess I won't be able to find a decent LOTF laying around either. But seriously, fixing up a LOTF source is a lot of work; might as well learn about packets etc. and try to build my own. It'd teach me useful things on the way.
2nd EDIT: TheCoServer huh, I can't find much about that one, the patch number interests me but the only source I was able to find was one tittled 'KoS source'.
3rd EDIT: So any reccomendation on what I should do? Taking my goal into account: A classic 1.0 like stable leveling server, the only non retail features would be custom items and stuff, but that's the easy part.
|
|
|
03/26/2011, 02:25
|
#12
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,892
Received Thanks: 920
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wsuo
Yeah I know, I'm using a clean (well I think it's the original clean one) 5017 LOTF source. I guess it's pretty straightforward and doesn't have much in it, will see if I have the time/am bothered to fix it all up T_T.
I just want to create a 1.0-like server.
EDIT: Geez... Way too much to do lol. Guess I won't be able to find a decent LOTF laying around either. But seriously, fixing up a LOTF source is a lot of work; might as well learn about packets etc. and try to build my own. It'd teach me useful things on the way.
2nd EDIT: TheCoServer huh, I can't find much about that one, the patch number interests me but the only source I was able to find was one tittled 'KoS source'.
3rd EDIT: So any reccomendation on what I should do? Taking my goal into account: A classic 1.0 like stable leveling server, the only non retail features would be custom items and stuff, but that's the easy part.
|
If you're not familiar with C#, then learn it (I knew C++ and it took me a weekend to learn C#) or build your own in whichever language you choose; if you're not familiar with any programming language, then use another as a base and LEARN WHAT YOU'RE DOING... It's going to take a lot of time regardless; mine's been in development for 4-5 months AND I'm even using Hybrid's source...
|
|
|
03/26/2011, 23:47
|
#13
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 237
Received Thanks: 99
|
there is a version of CoFuture on patch 4267 somewhere released
|
|
|
03/27/2011, 00:02
|
#14
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,892
Received Thanks: 920
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by |NeoX
there is a version of CoFuture on patch 4267 somewhere released 
|
Yes, but it's terribly unstable and extremely inefficient.
|
|
|
03/27/2011, 11:23
|
#15
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 237
Received Thanks: 99
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lateralus
Yes, but it's terribly unstable and extremely inefficient.
|
Better than LOTF or TheCoServer....
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:35.
|
|