[Unofficial] List of Legit / Scam COD Cheat Providers

[JustDoug]

Originally Posted by Awesoming

Well, I talked to @ yesterday and we had a good chat about PO's future plans, such as new features (that were exclusive to INTERWEBZ), safety protections taken by his current cheat (EXTERNAL) and about the future product line (DMA) and more private matters, and I've come to the conclusion that if the features we're planning to add to the PO cheat end up becoming reality, then 100% the best cheat to choose if you were a customer of mine (INTERWEBZ), will be Phantom Overlay, both for the current line which is external and the future one which will be DMA.

One of the new features that is planned to be added is:
- Native controller support
- Radar UAV (overlay/the same as INTERWEBZ had)
- Aimbot Deadzone (FOV/Fullbody)

So give it time

If this is true, I just got the biggest hard on, on the planet. 🥺

[ITAVB]

Originally Posted by Awesoming

Well, I talked to @ yesterday and we had a good chat about PO's future plans, such as new features (that were exclusive to INTERWEBZ), safety protections taken by his current cheat (EXTERNAL) and about the future product line (DMA) and more private matters, and I've come to the conclusion that if the features we're planning to add to the PO cheat end up becoming reality, then 100% the best cheat to choose if you were a customer of mine (INTERWEBZ), will be Phantom Overlay, both for the current line which is external and the future one which will be DMA.

One of the new features that is planned to be added is:
- Native controller support
- Radar UAV (overlay/the same as INTERWEBZ had)
- Aimbot Deadzone (FOV/Fullbody)

So give it time

seria bom se voce fosse um revendedor la para eu comprar em real o que tu acha

[DMUonaFFAR]

While I'm glad about aimbot deadzone,

and I don't care about implementing UAVs or controller aimbot although both are kind of concerning features to me given the other providers that had them...

I worry about the future of PO

Please make a full and a lite version for those of us that just want classic PO. Like how many providers do with Apex and Siege...

[zebleer]

Originally Posted by DMUonaFFAR

While I'm glad about aimbot deadzone,

and I don't care about implementing UAVs or controller aimbot although both are kind of concerning features to me given the other providers that had them...

I worry about the future of PO

Please make a full and a lite version for those of us that just want classic PO. Like how many providers do with Apex and Siege...

Nothing I'm adding in the future or added in the past has brought any meaningful detection vectors. As it's always been

I'm going to simulate controller input. Read only. Not going to write view angles. It's the same way I do my mouse aimbot, but for controller

In the past when I said I didn't want to add controller support due to risk it was because most providers supporting controller were writing view angles which I didn't want to do & still don't want to do. I don't write to the game's memory at all ever

[bigman001]

Originally Posted by Awesoming

Well, I talked to @ yesterday and we had a good chat about PO's future plans, such as new features (that were exclusive to INTERWEBZ), safety protections taken by his current cheat (EXTERNAL) and about the future product line (DMA) and more private matters, and I've come to the conclusion that if the features we're planning to add to the PO cheat end up becoming reality, then 100% the best cheat to choose if you were a customer of mine (INTERWEBZ), will be Phantom Overlay, both for the current line which is external and the future one which will be DMA.

One of the new features that is planned to be added is:
- Native controller support
- Radar UAV (overlay/the same as INTERWEBZ had)
- Aimbot Deadzone (FOV/Fullbody)

So give it time

Wow I'm really looking forward to this, hope it will be finished soon

[zebleer]

Originally Posted by Awesoming

Well, I talked to @zebleer yesterday and we had a good chat about PO's future plans, such as new features (that were exclusive to INTERWEBZ), safety protections taken by his current cheat (EXTERNAL) and about the future product line (DMA) and more private matters, and I've come to the conclusion that if the features we're planning to add to the PO cheat end up becoming reality, then 100% the best cheat to choose if you were a customer of mine (INTERWEBZ), will be Phantom Overlay, both for the current line which is external and the future one which will be DMA.

One of the new features that is planned to be added is:
- Native controller support
- Radar UAV (overlay/the same as INTERWEBZ had)
- Aimbot Deadzone (FOV/Fullbody)

So give it time

Yes thank you for the suggestions I will figure out how to implement the things you've suggested externally while staying read only ofc with the game

Already have some ideas

[lxwjianghu]

Originally Posted by Awesoming

Well, I talked to @ yesterday and we had a good chat about PO's future plans, such as new features (that were exclusive to INTERWEBZ), safety protections taken by his current cheat (EXTERNAL) and about the future product line (DMA) and more private matters, and I've come to the conclusion that if the features we're planning to add to the PO cheat end up becoming reality, then 100% the best cheat to choose if you were a customer of mine (INTERWEBZ), will be Phantom Overlay, both for the current line which is external and the future one which will be DMA.

One of the new features that is planned to be added is:
- Native controller support
- Radar UAV (overlay/the same as INTERWEBZ had)
- Aimbot Deadzone (FOV/Fullbody)

So give it time

When I was at COD2019, I have been a loyal customer of PO. If Zebler is willing to add IW's full map drone coverage in COD III, then I will never need to look at other products in the future. I hope Zebler will make an announcement in TG when it is completed. Thank you for bringing this good news to IW and PO customers

[BagsFernandes]

I don't recommend using engineowning, I'll give you feedback tomorrow with screenshots about everything that happened.

and thank you @ for recommending PhantomOverlay, despite the improvements it needs, it really is a good external cheat.

[zebleer]

Originally Posted by BagsFernandes

I don't recommend using engineowning, I'll give you feedback tomorrow with screenshots about everything that happened.

and thank you @Awesoming for recommending PhantomOverlay, despite the improvements it needs, it really is a good external cheat.

As your new signature daddy, I promise to treat you right while you're with me

Be on the lookout for our upcoming Telegram announcement about performance and feature improvements (all safe of course)

https://t.me/PhantomOverlayAnnouncements

[Phil_Swift]

Originally Posted by BagsFernandes

I don't recommend using engineowning, I'll give you feedback tomorrow with screenshots about everything that happened.

and thank you @ for recommending PhantomOverlay, despite the improvements it needs, it really is a good external cheat.

I mean tbf, you didn't know the difference between Aim Smoothing and Aim Speed on the EO forum..... as for the AB it works for sure, its strong af so you definitely gotta tweak it but I have had 0 issues with it once I found my settings for my playstyle (I also play on controller so it looks like AA). Spoofer works without issues as well. If PO does provide controller support then for sure would use them with my main as it's benched till I find the one

[DEGE5561]

Originally Posted by zebleer

Nothing I'm adding in the future or added in the past has brought any meaningful detection vectors. As it's always been

I'm going to simulate controller input. Read only. Not going to write view angles. It's the same way I do my mouse aimbot, but for controller

In the past when I said I didn't want to add controller support due to risk it was because most providers supporting controller were writing view angles which I didn't want to do & still don't want to do. I don't write to the game's memory at all ever

If you make aimbot humanizable like iw, your only competition will be yourself. iw went beyond the limits regarding aimbot. Seeing the same adjustments in PO will make everyone your customer. We want the iw aimbot menu in po, do your best my friend, it shouldn't be difficult for you.

[EvilKush]

Originally Posted by zebleer

Nothing I'm adding in the future or added in the past has brought any meaningful detection vectors. As it's always been

I'm going to simulate controller input. Read only. Not going to write view angles. It's the same way I do my mouse aimbot, but for controller

In the past when I said I didn't want to add controller support due to risk it was because most providers supporting controller were writing view angles which I didn't want to do & still don't want to do. I don't write to the game's memory at all ever

Quote from you less than 2 weeks ago:

“Any new comers from IW or AA looking at PO, I still don't think there is any way to do controller support without adding meaningful detection vectors so if you need that, you can use PO with DS4 for controller aimbot, ESP only with direct controller input, or switch to KBM. Otherwise PO may not be for you. Even providers who do the controller input method (safer than writing view angles) remove controller aimbot when dealing with bans or issues. It's not something that would be aligned with PO's security focus to add”

Can you please explain what has changed in such a short period of time? It seemed you had a very strong stance against it and many of your users are concerned your sacrificing safety to appease a few extra users.

[zebleer]

Originally Posted by EvilKush

Quote from you less than 2 weeks ago:

“Any new comers from IW or AA looking at PO, I still don't think there is any way to do controller support without adding meaningful detection vectors so if you need that, you can use PO with DS4 for controller aimbot, ESP only with direct controller input, or switch to KBM. Otherwise PO may not be for you. Even providers who do the controller input method (safer than writing view angles) remove controller aimbot when dealing with bans or issues. It's not something that would be aligned with PO's security focus to add”

Can you please explain what has changed in such a short period of time? It seemed you had a very strong stance against it and many of your users are concerned your sacrificing safety to appease a few extra users.

There are a few vectors that I misjudged and I've also found more information through the work I've put into it

I think for devices that don't use xinput using DS4 and pressing start to have DS4 handle things that would be risky for the cheat to handle is a good strategy

Doing it that way, I think controller input aimbot adds no meaningful detection vectors. I apologize for saying what I said as it wasn't fully informed & I know that I affected another provider with my words

Controller aimbot in the way I will do it adds no meaningful detection vectors. It is comparable to how we do mouse aimbot

So just pick mouse or controller aim & you have the same risk (very low)

[camocody1]

If only IW would lemme buy a private version

[puzzone85]

Originally Posted by BagsFernandes

I don't recommend using engineowning, I'll give you feedback tomorrow with screenshots about everything that happened.

and thank you @ for recommending PhantomOverlay, despite the improvements it needs, it really is a good external cheat.

I'm really curious to know what happened with EO, cause i was thinking giving it a try! Thanks

Originally Posted by zebleer

As your new signature daddy, I promise to treat you right while you're with me

Be on the lookout for our upcoming Telegram announcement about performance and feature improvements (all safe of course)

Please add controller support asap! Thanks