[Release] Derp Lite

[Ploxasarus]

Originally Posted by FadedSinner

Ok, just got the Derp Full version and it booted up nicely the first time, had to leave so I shut down, came back and went to boot up again and now I'm getting an error message. Something about side-by-side config. being incorrect. I'm not sure what to do here, can someone help out?

Uh, I don't understand how you'd get a side-by-side config error? Can you PM and show this to me because that's a bit odd/confusing..

You must have took a PHAAAT rip of your bong before posting this its hard to make sense of haha.. I do the same sometimes I dont blame you

Not really, I replied below then added things people were asking me about else wise. And I smoke everyday, all day and usually into the late nite - everyone who knows me, knows well and good I'm high 24/7 and its usually when I code and get my best ideas, too. Sometimes I tend to mix some drink in ( like now ) but usually I'm on an all day coffee binge.. The girly tends to think it will be the death of me and nag me often about it whilst I on the other hand believe to atleast know whats killing me so its fine

Also what I ment about the sunkens too, was this:



So enjoy and abuse it while you can since the whiners are qqing about it everywhere.

[ashy152]

Originally Posted by Ploxasarus

Uh, I don't understand how you'd get a side-by-side config error? Can you PM and show this to me because that's a bit odd/confusing..




Not really, I replied below then added things people were asking me about else wise. And I smoke everyday, all day and usually into the late nite - everyone who knows me, knows well and good I'm high 24/7 and its usually when I code and get my best ideas, too. Sometimes I tend to mix some drink in ( like now ) but usually I'm on an all day coffee binge.. The girly tends to think it will be the death of me and nag me often about it whilst I on the other hand believe to atleast know whats killing me so its fine

Also what I ment about the sunkens too, was this:



So enjoy and abuse it while you can since the whiners are qqing about it everywhere.

Same I go through like a half ounce a week, anyways I never went near any chests so **** knows whats up.

I dont mind really anyways I needed to stop playing that **** broken game haha

[Zaba2]

Hi i donate you great job.

I send you PM and add in Skype.

[fyllv7]

Originally Posted by Ploxasarus

Which is really exactly how it's been explained to be done time an time again and also what else to handle with it.

And GM's do also often because of people giving it so much attention look around alot at sunkens but you can't really help if a random reports you that is derping around doing **** all in the middle of the sea like some have done.


And I'm still getting to those abyssal packs an the jars but I'm trying to find a decent re-install for cryeditor since I reformatted during my machine rebuild and need an older version since AA uses as such and with the snow weather here kicking in its making things a bit tedious to get some stuff done so have patience

I've been using the mod for over a year now and i have never uninstalled the mods after i closing the game.
I just press 1, with the mods i want in, and let it there till next patch.
I have never been so wrong in my life? or nah?

[Lemegamot]

The speed "hack" work ?

[icethrone5]

Just sent you a pm for mod pack,

I dont know if it sent rip, its not showing up in my sent messages

[Ploxasarus]

Originally Posted by voidbyte

I smoked alot of dabs while decompiling your source

I'll paste you something someone pm'd me:

Why does that source that guy decompiled have old addresses in it? lol

Using a program off the internet is not decompile/reconstruct, that is just being a leecher, shame on you & shame for posting an old source.

Edit: I also looked at this, too, its actually you using a program and not doing it by hand when I look at how the source came out and you have no clue how reconstruct works. I'll add a personal packing method to the later versions of derp an this will solve the issue easily. Not sure why people waste they're time an go "GG Plox" when they are using tools off the internet to do **** for them, didn't know I was so special people would waste they're time to try to troll ignorantly. Is it because they don't know how to use olly to reverse the game themselves or does it make them feel special over the internet, one can only imagine.

Responding to all the Pm's now.

[Ploxasarus]

Originally Posted by voidbyte

old source my ass you lieing shit its directly decompiled from your 7.2.0 binary

you did a shitty job packing it with confuser 1.9

and ofcourse I used a tool you muppet, do you use olly when debugging a game? ofcourse you do, now dont be silly. You made it so easy I didnt have to do anything manually but remove junk code.

I didnt have to break out olly and patch your binary when I can just decompile down to your exact source code whats the point my man

The tool I used was nofuser to unpack confuser 1.9.0 then I used ILSpy to reconstruct your code.

Maybe you should step up your game and move on from .net, use as many custom packers as you want. a .net binary = source code

That would explain why it doesn't work for anyone else and it doesn't matter even if it does work for you, you used a program because you could not hand de-obfuscate it which you can actually do manually with olly and despite you saying of course you used a program then its kind of stupid to compare olly to what you used since you actually require a brain to use olly as opposed to ticking a few options an hitting run. As for using ILSpy, which is not something to "reconstruct" and you have no clue what that word even means in reversing, that would be why it looks as such, once a patch hits it is completely useless and you can't update it, so 'shrug', enjoy it until next week and good luck with the custom packer

P.S.: If you really want to compare e-peens, your a nobody and what you did is extremely low in compare to what it took to even do what derp does so to take 1 program and gloat about what you did using tools that are brainless is rather sad and you've earned no respect in the process of doing so and if anything all you've shown is lack of skill and that haters are gonna hate.

I'm still fabulous.

[voidbyte]

Originally Posted by Ploxasarus

As for using ILSpy, which is not something to "reconstruct" and you have no clue what that word even means in reversing

semantics, whatever.

What I ment by that is when unpacking your binary it broke the mysql module and a few others. I had to delete them and any calls to them etc to make it work again thats what I ment by reconstruct. Theres probably a better word to use but whatever.

And I tested it on multiple machines it works fine. in a update next week people who have a brain can search for the new addresses themselfs and recompile. or wait for me to decompile your update lul.

Now you have to add some big new feature to make it even worth cracking your custom packer otherwise I will just update the addresses and change the number to match.

EDIT: you are pretty fabulous btw I cant deny that and I wont lie I just started learning assembly and reversing last week(after listening to you stroking your ego on agent norths stream), just shows you how little effort you put into protecting your assets. I hope to learn with every update.

[Ploxasarus]

And I tested it on multiple machines it works fine. in a update next week people who have a brain can search for the new addresses themselfs and recompile. or wait for me to decompile your update lul.

By using a public method when I can just add a private one, makes sense.

You can't update the addresses, best of luck with that.

Edit: I'm gonna post on the real, cause quite frankly I get tired of people on here for the most part when it comes to stupid shit like this. You use a program you didn't make, ontop of another program you didn't make, to rip from a program you didn't make, then claim it out like its impressive when generally its stupid as fuck to even attempt to bother or brag about. It shows lack of skill, doesn't even upset or bother me in the least bit and just amuses me that people waste they're fucking time to even do so because they can't do anything themselves an have to mooch off others constantly then claim it like they're own an people praise them out of stupidity when I on the other hand take the time & effort to not only make, reverse, but also deal with the legal bullshit too from Trion/XL. Not even to mention the RU has already mooched the source several times in they're underground so you are far from the first to even bother when even they couldn't keep shit updated through the patches an went to doing they're own stuff.. Really, it gets old & is stupid.

As for 'protecting my assets' - I have this thing called a real job, everything from here is put towards keeping a host up & dealing with legal shit too, so you're not hurting anything except yourself in this. It doesn't even upset me, because I obviously didn't try to hard when you look at the strings in ILSpy and see what exactly its obfuscated with, lol... Even any antivirus will show it too . This is like when buffy used autoit for his program an people used something to reverse it or when i first released unf an people used ilspy on it - we didn't care and it didn't hurt any ego at all. We're still the finders & creators of the hacks, so the reputation still stays the same.

You have a long way to go in reversing if you're using those programs, a very long way indeed.

[pozboy]

^ their*

[voidbyte]

Originally Posted by Ploxasarus

You can't update the addresses, best of luck with that.

Function.WriteByteArray(959509547, 4u, new byte[]
{
243,
15,
92,
217
});

Why not?

Originally Posted by Ploxasarus

You have a long way to go in reversing if you're using those programs, a very long way indeed.

I agree

[Ploxasarus]

Originally Posted by voidbyte

Function.WriteByteArray(959509547, 4u, new byte[]
{
243,
15,
92,
217
});

Why not?



I agree

So then what address is 959509547 ?

[Ploxasarus]

Originally Posted by voidbyte

Why would I spend time doing it manually when I could drop it onto one exe icon and then another? make it harder next time please. It was literally easier to crack then a if statement switch

Harder? Using a leeched program = easy? LOL

Again, it was no secret on it what was used, ITS IN THE ANTIVIRUS SCAN, LOL.

You are seriously a ******* idiot, I had absolutely no care to leaving it as it was, nor do I even so now.

[voidbyte]

Originally Posted by Ploxasarus

Harder? Using a leeched program = easy? LOL

Again, it was no secret on it what was used, ITS IN THE ANTIVIRUS SCAN, LOL.

You are seriously a ******* idiot, I had absolutely no care to leaving it as it was, nor do I even so now.

I seem to have hit a nerve sorry