I would just like to say proofcore is good, and I can't comment on their security, but our security is definitely some of the best. Even still, we are working on an update that will make our security unbeatable. Regardless, we've been undetected since release around 10 months ago.
I appreciate the kind words, though.
Proofcore is better, especially since it has a built-in spoofer. As the owner of "NRG," your statement about working on an update to make security unbeatable is hard to take seriously. Of course you’ll say that; you’re the owner. Many Cheat Owners have made similar claims before, only for their cheats to get detected later. It's a normal risk for cheats to face detections, but it's misleading to suggest otherwise to say that you're gonna make your security unbeatable.
Proofcore is better, especially since it has a built-in spoofer. As the owner of "NRG," your statement about working on an update to make security unbeatable is hard to take seriously. Of course you’ll say that; you’re the owner. Many Cheat Owners have made similar claims before, only for their cheats to get detected later. It's a normal risk for cheats to face detections, but it's misleading to suggest otherwise to say that you're gonna make your security unbeatable.
That's fair to say, but its definitely not misleading, at least in the way I mean it. When I say "unbeatable", I mean unbeatable by any other cheats on the market.
Both providers offer good value for money, NRG is public and Proofcore is private.
The fact EAC is a strong AC that is why I prefer proof core for a low userbase and more security concerns.
Both providers offer good value for money, NRG is public and Proofcore is private.
The fact EAC is a strong AC that is why I prefer proof core for a low userbase and more security concerns.
Really? Been using proofcore for a few months now and for the most part it's always the same people in the chat, would easily say proofcore has a lower user base then nrg. But I could be wrong I guess that what I think tho.
