Quote:
Originally posted by gentonk+Jan 22 2007, 11:27--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (gentonk @ Jan 22 2007, 11:27)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--Coksnuss@Jan 22 2007, 09:24
Then +3 would need 12 +1's instead of 10 , or?
(3 +2 = +3)
|
no .. she's right .. it only needs 10 [+1]
1 [+2] --> updated item = 1*4 [+1] = 4 [+1]
2 [+2] --> 2 * 1 [+2] = 2 * 3 [+1] = 6 [+1]
then total = 4 [+1] + 6 [+1] = 10 [+1]
the formula :
Code:
total = ((tn - 1) * 2) + tn
tn = total needed [+1]
ex : for +3 :
tn = 4 from [+2]
total = ((4-1) * 2) + 4 =
10
but the strange is when i tried to calculate using +1 calculator from CO forum, it's wrong amount on +6 (it's 344) and higher ... i guess the calculator is wrong :rolleyes: [/b][/quote]
ok u have that massive calculation thingo...i have
the next + will take 3* as many +1's as the first, so for +3 from +2 u need 6 because +1-+2 takes 2.... so much easier, just *3 each time