+9

01/22/2007 00:32 RainbowOrange#1
2 +1 items=+1
4 +1 items=+2
10 +1 items=+3
28+1 items=+4
82+1 items=+5
244+1 items=+6
730+1 items=+7
2188+1 items=+8
6562+1 items=+9

guess this aint that important now since tq made those + stone thing
01/22/2007 00:35 spoonieluv97#2
"6562+1 items=+9"

^^ so crazy. nobody gonna do that. just win 3 +8s from lotto and trade them for the ones you want. I just made it sound easy, but it would probably take months to find somebody with the +8 you wanted that wants the +8 you have. I know like a +1 ring is better than a +2 warr armor, but at numbers like +8, it probably doesn't amtter what item, they are +8's
01/22/2007 00:44 RainbowOrange#3
yea i know that why i said it not important anymoe after stupid patch
01/22/2007 01:02 CONQUER 2.0#4
rofl 2 +1s make a +2 also
01/22/2007 01:13 kleinster#5
Quote:
Originally posted by CONQUER 2.0@Jan 22 2007, 01:02
rofl 2 +1s make a +2 also
He means in total i guess
01/22/2007 01:20 RainbowOrange#6
Quote:
Originally posted by CONQUER 2.0@Jan 22 2007, 01:02
rofl 2 +1s make a +2 also
i meant from +0 to +2 not from +1 to +2
01/22/2007 09:24 Coksnuss#7
Then +3 would need 12 +1's instead of 10 , or?

(3 +2 = +3)
01/22/2007 11:27 gentonk#8
Quote:
Originally posted by Coksnuss@Jan 22 2007, 09:24
Then +3 would need 12 +1's instead of 10 , or?

(3 +2 = +3)
no .. she's right .. it only needs 10 [+1]

1 [+2] --> updated item = 1*4 [+1] = 4 [+1]
2 [+2] --> 2 * 1 [+2] = 2 * 3 [+1] = 6 [+1]

then total = 4 [+1] + 6 [+1] = 10 [+1]

the formula :
Code:
total = ((tn - 1) * 2) + tn
tn = total needed [+1]

ex : for +3 :
tn = 4 from [+2]

total = ((4-1) * 2) + 4 = 10

but the strange is when i tried to calculate using +1 calculator from CO forum, it's wrong amount on +6 (it's 344) and higher ... i guess the calculator is wrong :rolleyes:
01/22/2007 11:32 fady1wu#9
erm lol.
geush you like math :P
but this is whel known
01/22/2007 11:38 gentonk#10
lol .. but yeah it's well known .. just trying to correct Coksnuss ... and when i looked on [+1] image about composing which i got long time ago, the amount is also wrong :rolleyes: ..
01/22/2007 12:01 freddofrog~#11
Quote:
Originally posted by gentonk+Jan 22 2007, 11:27--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (gentonk @ Jan 22 2007, 11:27)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--Coksnuss@Jan 22 2007, 09:24
Then +3 would need 12 +1's instead of 10 , or?

(3 +2 = +3)
no .. she's right .. it only needs 10 [+1]

1 [+2] --> updated item = 1*4 [+1] = 4 [+1]
2 [+2] --> 2 * 1 [+2] = 2 * 3 [+1] = 6 [+1]

then total = 4 [+1] + 6 [+1] = 10 [+1]

the formula :
Code:
total = &#40;&#40;tn - 1&#41; * 2&#41; + tn
tn = total needed [+1]

ex : for +3 :
tn = 4 from [+2]

total = ((4-1) * 2) + 4 = 10

but the strange is when i tried to calculate using +1 calculator from CO forum, it's wrong amount on +6 (it's 344) and higher ... i guess the calculator is wrong :rolleyes: [/b][/quote]
ok u have that massive calculation thingo...i have

the next + will take 3* as many +1's as the first, so for +3 from +2 u need 6 because +1-+2 takes 2.... so much easier, just *3 each time
01/22/2007 12:30 gentonk#12
Quote:
Originally posted by freddofrog~+Jan 22 2007, 12:01--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (freddofrog~ @ Jan 22 2007, 12:01)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> ok u have that massive calculation thingo...i have

the next + will take 3* as many +1's as the first, so for +3 from +2 u need 6 because +1-+2 takes 2.... so much easier, just *3 each time [/b]

don't understand :dizzy: ... just *3 from what ? total [+1] of upgraded one ? then u're wrong .. tried to calculate using your *3 until [+9] :p ... or atleast try to calculate [+4] ..

and also :

<!--QuoteBegin--RainbowOrange
@Today 01:20
i meant from +0 to +2 not from +1 to +2 [/quote]
01/22/2007 16:32 yaoball#13
@ gentonk Hmmm, yea but if according to her, '' i meant from +0 to +2 not from +1 to +2 ''.
Then +3 should have been 12. cux its 3*(1*4 [+1] = 4 [+1]) ^^
01/22/2007 16:47 tasha#14
use this to see how many +1's and how much it will cost you

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
01/23/2007 07:40 gentonk#15
Quote:
Originally posted by yaoball+Jan 22 2007, 16:32--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (yaoball @ Jan 22 2007, 16:32)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>@ gentonk Hmmm, yea but if according to her, '' i meant from +0 to +2 not from +1 to +2 ''.
Then +3 should have been 12. cux its 3*(1*4 [+1] = 4 [+1]) ^^[/b]

no .. i had showed it detail before ..
Quote:

no .. she's right .. it only needs 10 [+1]

1 [+2] --> updated item = 1*4 [+1] = 4 [+1] <-- it's from 0 to +2
2 [+2] --> 2 * 1 [+2] = 2 * 3 [+1] = 6 [+1]

then total = 4 [+1] + 6 [+1] = 10 [+1]
and it's same total from tasha and from copc co forum ;)


<hr>Append on Jan 23 2007, 07:46<hr><!--QuoteBegin--tasha
@Jan 22 2007, 16:47
use this to see how many +1's and how much it will cost you

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
[/quote]
hope the image will show :rolleyes: ...

but if not then input like this :
Code:
&#91;u&#93;&#91;b&#93;Input &#58;&#91;/b&#93;&#91;/u&#93;
&#91;b&#93;Current Item + &#58;&#91;/b&#93; &#91;empty&#93;
&#91;b&#93;Target Item +&#58;&#91;/b&#93; &#91;+3&#93;
&#91;b&#93;Cost per +1&#58;&#91;/b&#93; &#91;0&#93;
and you will get result like this :
Code:
&#91;u&#93;&#91;b&#93;Result &#58;&#91;/b&#93;&#91;/u&#93;
&#91;+0 to +1&#93; 2 +1 items
&#91;+1 to +2&#93; 2 +1 items
&#91;+2 to +3&#93; 6 +1 items
&#91;+0 to +3&#93; 10 +1 items

<hr>Append on Jan 23 2007, 08:07<hr> sorry i post again .. coz when i edited previous post, it's mess up with HTML tag :rolleyes: ..

here is the image from tasha link :
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

and here is the image from copc :
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]