Weaving .Dll or other program?

Well, I'm going to be needing something to help me through rank 8 of weaving, and have been looking for a .dll or other program that will gaurantee making finest silks/fabrics. I haven't had any luck so far, so I've come to request one, or have someone clarify if such a thing even exists.

Thanks~

Quote:

Originally Posted by KojiroKage Well, I'm going to be needing something to help me through rank 8 of weaving, and have been looking for a .dll or other program that will gaurantee making finest silks/fabrics. I haven't had any luck so far, so I've come to request one, or have someone clarify if such a thing even exists. Thanks~

leecher newb ish newb :O

Impossible.

Silk success rates are calculated server side.

The best you could do was modify the success rate to never fail at weaving, but there is no guarantee that would work.

i remember there was one for refine and i think you can packet edit for tailoring but its easy to trace they might be some old threads about this try searching it

Refining is very impractical, as there is no success rate call.

For tailoring, we have twintail.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfslashed Refining is very impractical, as there is no success rate call. For tailoring, we have twintail.

Which mostly gives B+ material.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfslashed Refining is very impractical, as there is no success rate call. For tailoring, we have twintail.

and for twintail we has bypass o.O

Or included in an IJL patcher

Even if it was possible, you wouldn't be getting it.

But I made it :O

I was talking to the OP, not you. Lol

However, I still believe that there might be a refining or weaving "hack" possible, considering I or anyone else ever looked into the packets of Weaving and Refining and the such..

eeeeeeewwwww packets :S

Quote:

Originally Posted by tbstewa eeeeeeewwwww packets :S

Ewwww indeed.

It's odd how the packets for these things work, fishing for example, when auto fish is used, the packet that is received is the same for both a fail and a success, which denotes that the determining factor is client sided based on whether a packet is received, correct?
So to see if this kind of edit is possible via a .dll modification we should first check to see if a different packet is sent for success/failure.

Quote:

Originally Posted by tbstewa eeeeeeewwwww packets :S

nothing wrong with packets. packets helped invent range dll and 1 charge fireball :D