This is licensed product from an official website that's sold for a certain amount of money. I remember you taking down a link that featured usernames / passwords for an antivirus though it was not requested to be taken down by the "owner". This is contradictory behavior to be honest.Quote:
The website has no real license usage, and as long as the owner does not request its takedown, it is ok
As long as you dont post licensed content, we go by that rules
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
That case is different, as it was a licensed software. Warez defines anything which license states it cannot be freely distributed.Quote:
This is licensed product from an official website that's sold for a certain amount of money. I remember you taking down a link that featured usernames / passwords for an antivirus though it was not requested to be taken down by the "owner". This is contradictory behavior to be honest.
It's not about you at all in fact I don't even mind the template being shared neither I give a fuck. I was just questioning the "double standards" on their rules nothing else.Quote:
:confused: :confused:
:facepalm:
Jean, i admire and respect you so:
may i inquire the problem of sharing something already public on Github for 2 years now?
Once again, this website template does not hold a legal license, which is why the distribution of it is ok as long as the owner does not request its takedownQuote:
It's not about you at all in fact I don't even mind the template being shared neither I give a fuck. I was just questioning the "double standards" on their rules nothing else.
Actually, noQuote:
Actually it has a legal license cuz it's a paid template, It's on my gmail already but i don't give a fuck about the template to waste time searching for it.
Anyway the whole p-sro shit is illegal already.