[FAILURE] Sources

5165 ---> nice but Damn 6 max password (100% nice but - 30% the password) :D

5095 ---> Buggy source (50% nice and 50% Bugs)

5065 ---> LOL, Only TQ has 5065 source (Better to play Real Co than Pserver TQ)

5017 ---> 100% nice and 1% bug

Agree? :D Imma release the House for LOFT later coz I just fixed it lastnight..

"revivehere" packet for LOFT 100% done..wait me to release it...

Anyway, revivehere is done but OfflineTG is hard....

case for OfflineTG is 2044:

-Thanks.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cryptous 5165 ---> nice but Damn 6 max password (100% nice but - 30% the password) :D 5095 ---> Buggy source (50% nice and 50% Bugs) 5065 ---> LOL, Only TQ has 5065 source (Better to play Real Co than Pserver TQ) 5017 ---> 100% nice and 1% bug Agree? :D Imma release the House for LOFT later coz I just fixed it lastnight.. "revivehere" packet for LOFT 100% done..wait me to release it... Anyway, revivehere is done but OfflineTG is hard.... case for OfflineTG is 2044: -Thanks.

Actually lotf is alot more than just 1% bugs lol.
thats a very buggy source indeed.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tiku Actually lotf is alot more than just 1% bugs lol. thats a very buggy source indeed.

Nope...LOFT almost done...you can say that coz your not playing/coding LOFT one...yes, more than 1% buggy but still perfect to those who know coding well.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cryptous Nope...LOFT almost done...you can say that coz your not playing/coding LOFT one...yes, more than 1% buggy but still perfect to those who know coding well.

No, I coded LOTF for the longest time.
that's what I stared with,and probably most people on epvpers.(there better?)
Lotf is a very very buggy source.
Nowhere near perfect.

Lol tq isnt the only one with a 5065 source

i have a 5065 lotf

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tiku No, I coded LOTF for the longest time. that's what I stared with, as well as everyone else here on E*PvPers. Lotf is a very very buggy source. Nowhere near perfect.

Dude, speak for yourself. I didn't touch that shitty source. Just because what you had was buggy doesn't mean everyone's was. I agree with Cryptous on this one, anyone that is good with coding could fix it, then again, it wouldn't really be considered a Lotf source...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cryptous Nope...LOFT almost done...you can say that coz your not playing/coding LOFT one...yes, more than 1% buggy but still perfect to those who know coding well.

the only failure i see are your statements, LOTF is the opposite from perfect to someone who knows what they are doing. it's great for noobs that don't know how bad it really is.

I wrote a 5065 source for Co, but i upgraded to 5100 when that came out. I agree with the comments about LOTF, its awful.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tiku No, I coded LOTF for the longest time. Fail? Longest Time? Uhm NO? Im still messing with it since two years now. CoNorth was a great Server back in the days and yes its stable and not totally bugged... that's what I stared with, Who cares? as well as everyone else here on E*PvPers. Its only ya noobs who started with LOTF Im in the bussiness since TheCoServer Released. Lotf is a very very buggy source. So is CoEMU, And all other sources outta here. Nowhere near perfect. Nothing is perfect go cry now. -.-

Bye

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tiku No, I coded LOTF for the longest time. that's what I stared with, as well as everyone else here on E*PvPers. Lotf is a very very buggy source. Nowhere near perfect.

Your theory that is underlined in the quote has just been proven wrong. I did not start with this at all, nor did I start with the so-called "Qonquer Source". So don't say everyone, we are not all the same as you.

- Hidden Tutor

for the 5165 the password max is not that its only with the regpage.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tiku No, I coded LOTF for the longest time. that's what I stared with, as well as everyone else here on E*PvPers. Lotf is a very very buggy source. Nowhere near perfect.

Lies.
LOTF is not very buggy, it is unstable.
There aren't many bugs which are hard to fix, only stability will never be fixed without changing the source big times.

About 5165, the passwords haven't got a maximum amount of characters, the register page does, so change that, and if the source does, change it as well, its easy.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cryptous 5165 ---> nice but Damn 6 max password (100% nice but - 30% the password) :D 5095 ---> Buggy source (50% nice and 50% Bugs) 5065 ---> LOL, Only TQ has 5065 source (Better to play Real Co than Pserver TQ) 5017 ---> 100% nice and 1% bug -Thanks.

5165 - There is no limit on the passwords you are only limited by the crappy regpage limitations you used.

5095 - morelike 1% bugs if you know what your doing.

5065 - Only the same as TQ because 99% of the noobs running it don't know how to customize it to make it unique and not like tq which can be done if you know how.

5017 - the most unstable source on the planet it has tons of bugs i think when i redid it all years ago my list of bugs i found exceeded 53 or more that needed fixed sure most of them were easy fixes but some were not including rewrite of the socket layer and sql to make it stable.

I don't care what editing/fixing you have done to 5017 if ya didn't recode the socket handling and the sql it is junk no matter what else you have fixed lol because with a load of people on it other then yourself and 2-3 friends it's gonna crash or freeze up like everyone elses that thinks they fixed it before you.

I only know of 2 people that successfully made 100% stable lotf and proved it with heavy loads of players without any problems and that was myself and Saint years ago, There might be others but none over the years that i have seen posted claiming to be stable actually ever were with more then 30+ people on it. Many people long before you and as aerogant as you claimed to have fixed it all up and really didn't.

And enless you also coded in sanity checks on everything ( which i doubt ) it is exploitable/hackable in so many ways i won't even bother posting them all, Everyone can just use cheat engine and give themselves anything they want and it is very vulnerable to sql injections.

You can't build a skyscraper on sand, And fixing anything other then the base first in lotf is doing just that and i'm sure yours is no different i'll put $100 bucks on it that your source doesn't handle more then little over 30+ users before it starts scrolling null references errors all over and enumeration errors and eventually freezes up and crashes and needs constant restarts like everyone elses LOL.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tw3ak You can't build a skyscraper on sand

The prince of Dubai would be very upset with what you said. :(

Limit of 16 characters on passwords.
Noobs.