[FINAL RELEASE]HuB- Source (BASIC) (Original LOTF easier workable)

#REMOVED

features?

Sounds like the one prot0type released, except he had mana fixed.

Quote:

Originally Posted by _legitimate_ features?

Read, no features.
Only broadcast and stamina bug fixed.
is 100%Regular LOTF, but jsut more workable, cause i made regions.

Quote:

Originally Posted by .Matt Sounds like the one prot0type released, except he had mana fixed.

Huh?

Quote:

Originally Posted by grillmad Read, no features. Only broadcast and stamina bug fixed. is 100%Regular LOTF, but jsut more workable, cause i made regions. Huh?

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Quote:

Originally Posted by .Matt [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

ah okay :)
But i didnt do much. I just made some regions and some other small things to make it more workable :)

i heard LOTF can't even hold over 40 players online without being stable, is this true?

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChingChong23 i heard LOTF can't even hold over 40 players online without being stable, is this true?

i had 60 XD
If you get dedicated it can.
Self host 60-70 with good lag :)

@The upload is taking 6hours wtf, my net sucks today.
So i will go to bed and put link to here tomorrow.
So cya tomorrow, then it will be my last post, when im saying UPDATE.
Cya untill.

wow, so people have not even tested this on a dedi? of course your home computers won't handle it.

Rofl, this isn't a source. Next time post this when u've uploaded it.
Or even better, don't release this.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChingChong23 wow, so people have not even tested this on a dedi? of course your home computers won't handle it.

Not this release, the original lotf wasnt much better even on a dedi, but this is going back abit.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Korvacs Not this release, the original lotf wasnt much better even on a dedi, but this is going back abit.

What exactly happened when it became unstable? was it just laggy, or tons of errors everywhere? Info would be nice if you have some. cheers

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChingChong23 What exactly happened when it became unstable? was it just laggy, or tons of errors everywhere? Info would be nice if you have some. cheers

I never touched the thing, ive seen some code from it and its awful, the lotf source uses pointers, but the guy who wrote it made mistakes because he didnt know what he was doing, so you would get things dumped into invalid memory and stuff like that, so i can only assume it lags itself into oblivion and then crashes due to memory errors.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Korvacs I never touched the thing, ive seen some code from it and its awful, the lotf source uses pointers, but the guy who wrote it made mistakes because he didnt know what he was doing, so you would get things dumped into invalid memory and stuff like that, so i can only assume it lags itself into oblivion and then crashes due to memory errors.

heh. when i was using LOTF as a reference for some packets, i saw that he was storing Items as a string itemuid-itemid-plus-bless etc, i thought that's how the conquer client accepted items or something. later down the track i saw thats just how he was structuring it and thought wow thats bad, splitting it up everywhere too.

However i won't hate on him since i used a big amount of his packets, they were most likely just taken from the pb wiki though right?

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChingChong23 heh. when i was using LOTF as a reference for some packets, i saw that he was storing Items as a string itemuid-itemid-plus-bless etc, i thought that's how the conquer client accepted items or something. later down the track i saw thats just how he was structuring it and thought wow thats bad, splitting it up everywhere too. However i won't hate on him since i used a big amount of his packets, they were most likely just taken from the pb wiki though right?

No, he took them from other released sources.