Official Xigncode(AntiCheats) Topic

04/04/2015 15:05 MRx86™#1
XignCode

Xigncode which is provided by wellbia.


Lets talk about this anticheats which will be really soon the new anticheats for every nexon game. WR.CA.ETC ETC!

The contract with the ahnlabs is finally finished. and nexon has decided to not renew it. and switching to the xingcode. let's talk together about this anticheats


For the EPVP Moderator Team. when this notice will be official to nexon website. Please PIN this topic.
04/04/2015 17:20 const*#2
Do you know more about that? Will that be better?
04/04/2015 17:39 n4n033#3
Quote:
Originally Posted by *static_cast View Post
Do you know more about that? Will that be better?
Depends for who, better because there will be much less cheats when it will be implemented so while coders will be working on XIGN bypass there'll be no more hacks
04/04/2015 19:40 Zn1337#4
Xigncode detects Windows API. Using CreateThread won't work.
Creating hacks will become really different.
04/04/2015 19:50 ryaN.jeZoo#5
Hay.
I have an XIGN Cleaner.
Download: [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Have fun. :)

mfg.
04/04/2015 20:15 xKahba#6
Mal gucken .. Wird schon irgendwie gehen. Ich meine wir Coder aus der WR-Scene sind ja jetzt nicht vom Mond und habe in der Zeit bereits vieles über Hooking ect. gelernt.
04/05/2015 15:12 Sleutel#7
I can't believe that this topic already turned out into a off-topic discussion on who's English is better. Anyways, anti-cheats aren't flawless so there will be a ways of bypassing this. I'm really wondering how they will implement it inside WarRock. This might affect private servers as well.

And btw..
When warrock is no more = correct, only the t needs to be dropped from the not.
Off-topic discussion 1 ended, now back on-topic please.
04/05/2015 16:46 Omdi#8
XTrap would have been a better choice :)
04/05/2015 16:48 MRx86™#9
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omdihar View Post
XTrap would have been a better choice :)
Not really. since xigncode have better sys supports.
Xtrap would be more easy with some sys knowledge.
04/05/2015 16:52 Omdi#10
Quote:
Originally Posted by GHTheBoss View Post
Not really. since xigncode have better sys supports.
Xtrap would be more easy with some sys knowledge.
Are you familiar with both AC's or how do you know that?
IMO XTrap was pretty good :)
04/05/2015 16:54 MRx86™#11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omdihar View Post
Are you familiar with both AC's or how do you know that?
IMO XTrap was pretty good :)
xtrap is still awesome and pretty good anticheats.
yes i'm familiar with both anticheats. and i can still xtrap is an awesome anticheats with their trick they detecting everything.


but xigncode is way a better due to his awesome driver.
04/05/2015 17:06 const*#12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omdihar View Post
XTrap would have been a better choice :)
Well, as far as I know Crossfire EU/NA had it - and as you might know, there were lots of cheaters/hackers...?
04/05/2015 17:26 Omdi#13
Quote:
Originally Posted by *static_cast View Post
Well, as far as I know Crossfire EU/NA had it - and as you might know, there were lots of cheaters/hackers...?
It had a few security holes but to be perfectly honest, as other Anti-Cheats go XTrap was in fact pretty decent.
04/05/2015 17:30 const*#14
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omdihar View Post
It had a few security holes but to be perfectly honest, as other Anti-Cheats go XTrap was in fact pretty decent.
Do you think Xigncode will change something? Not only for some days, what I mean is over a longer span of time - 1, 2, 3 years...?
04/05/2015 17:37 Omdi#15
Quote:
Originally Posted by *static_cast View Post
Do you think Xigncode will change something? Not only for some days, what I mean is over a longer span of time - 1, 2, 3 years...?
I never had to deal with it, so it is kinda hard to give you an answer :p