Weren't they both leaked about 7-9 or so months ago? I know that only a few people actually have them, but why aren't they using them to make a decent p-server(aside from ex-sro or whatever)?
You`re full of negativity. How in the world somebody would revive a so called dead game. Look at Skalidor 2. Goodbye , Try to look at bright side.Quote:
Simple: because it would be interesting at the beginning - but sooner or later the servers would die too. You can say what you want, but this is going to happen! enough cases like these have been out there. Also the owners of these files aren't really into no-lifing and trying to get rich with a dead game. some people own these files since February 2011, I've seen them already. But, as I said, no way in opening a server on such fucked-up gaming community who first wants x5 rates, and after 3 days want x5000 rates.
Get over it.
sro is dead.
for the ones seeking the files: they won't be released by the people who have them - not even when you beg for them. Also because the server handling is almost the same as the vsro ones. Of course there are nice new features like linked items in global chat and so on.. but, meeeehh.
You now ask "if they won't host a unique server, why aren't they going to release them?" Simple - The community doesn't really deserve such release, and this would kill the scene even more.
It's good like it is. forget about it and do somethign useful out of your life.
No monopoly = no cash, no future.
Yeah that guy is totally full of negativity!Quote:
You`re full of negativity. How in the world somebody would revive a so called dead game. Look at Skalidor 2. Goodbye , Try to look at bright side.
i secretly love you, no homoQuote:
Yeah that guy is totally full of negativity!
especially towards me!
Im pretty sure i have seen a server or two running on ksro or isro files which got shut down shortly after launch, could be fakes i have no idea.
Still nothing too special imo...
cant be much more new on isro/ksro can it? same bugs/glitches, fellow pets, fortress... all the same, except for global-item-linking ?