Do i need to say anymore?
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
PS: Direct X is amazing :)
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
PS: Direct X is amazing :)
I believe I released a lib back then that pretty much hinted at how you should initialize it.Quote:
I'm trying to understand how you did this one, are you using a DirectX hook with a few resource edits to Conquer.exe, or are you doing something else? Again, amazing - I seriously love seeing these threads from you, they always make me think.
My educated question about how he programmed the feature is retarded, huh? Well, sorry that my two years of programming experience didn't cover this extremely specific programming technique. Please care to explain so I don't make the same mistake again.Quote:
Your question is pretty retarded "I love Dx". I would of said this over Skype aswell so don't use advantage of territory.
Long answer: yes, short answer: yes.Quote:
My educated question about how he programmed the feature is retarded, huh? Well, sorry that my two years of programming experience didn't cover this extremely specific programming technique. Please care to explain so I don't make the same mistake again.
I believe I'm responding appropriately. I'm requesting that you provide me with more information because my limited experience doesn't include this subject. If you're unable to explain to me why my question was so "retarded", then hopefully another member will because I'm very interested in this subject.Quote:
Long answer: yes, short answer: yes.
Love it when you automaticly go into defense mode.
Well if you look up more on the subject you will be amazed how resourceful the internet is. I don't believe me or Ulti are going to share any documentation for that matter.Quote:
I believe I'm responding appropriately. I'm requesting that you provide me with more information because my limited experience doesn't include this subject. If you're unable to explain to me why my question was so "retarded", then hopefully another member will because I'm very interested in this subject.
The community is in a troubling state when the top contributors and programmers in the community are telling each other to screw off and figure things out on their own. I'm not asking for a detailed explanation on how to implement such a thing, I was simply asking what technologies were used. I was trying to be social and ask what approach he took. I know the technology now thanks to another member. If you don't want members to know of that technology, fine. I won't tread on anyone's feet, so to speak. Though, it's just unnecessary drama in my opinion and a harm on the people actually interested. Sorry you found my interest to be retarded.Quote:
Well if you look up more on the subject you will be amazed how resourceful the internet is. I don't believe me or Ulti are going to share any documentation for that matter.
On the latest client as far as i know the easiest way to get past there protection is to hook GetModuleName (Or something like that). And GetWindowText?? (spomething like that) and check the data against your window name and return null or false. That pretty much takes care of tqs EnumWindos and EnumModules.Quote:
With some reverse engineering and the winapi this could be achieved as well. I know Conquer blocks childs that are not created by itself. (At least from my experience?)
You could start out going from the call to EnumChildWindows in Conquer.exe and figure out where it checks for such shit.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
I'm sure this is not the way Ulti did it tho, but meh.
|
|