Is there a packet reference available

Hello everyone,

I might start working on a private server in Java after my finals are over so I have question to ask you guys. Is there any packet reference guide like Korvacs wiki still available for me to use? I know that I can simply download some of the public sources to get the structures and use that but I would just like to know if one still exists.

Thanks,

Tkblackbelt

in "Java"?

..., God bless you son, I'd like to give you a vid to help you pass through time.

replay it when it's done.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ×Holo in "Java"? ..., God bless you son, I'd like to give you a vid to help you pass through time. [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] replay it when it's done.

What's wrong with Java?

Quote:

Originally Posted by tkblackbelt What's wrong with Java?

I may be biased but... what reason is there to use java?

.net is currently more developed then java and C# shares a VERY similar syntax (if it was more of a language comfort issue).

If it's for cross platform purposes.... mono has made huge strides in past years making .net viable for use on linux and max... or there's the C++ options.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ×Holo in "Java"? ..., God bless you son, I'd like to give you a vid to help you pass through time. [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] replay it when it's done.

The video should be longer, I`m tired of replaying it every 100 hours.

Quote:

Originally Posted by pro4never If it's for cross platform purposes.... mono has made huge strides in past years making .net viable for use on linux and max... or there's the C++ options.

Anyway .NET on Linux it`s availabe up to 2.0 3.0 using Wine or MONO Project. I left Linux a few weeks ago, but I thought 4.0 isn`t available yet.

Quote:

Originally Posted by pro4never I may be biased but... what reason is there to use java? .net is currently more developed then java and C# shares a VERY similar syntax (if it was more of a language comfort issue). If it's for cross platform purposes.... mono has made huge strides in past years making .net viable for use on linux and max... or there's the C++ options.

Yes it's mostly a comfort issue since I have a lot more experience in Java then C# but I've been reading through some C# sources and it seems like it would be very easy to adapt to. Not to mention I would be able to get help if needed since C# is the most used language on this forum.

Thanks :)

Edit: Ahaa my UML editor has code generation support for C# :)

You can easily move from Java to C#, they both have very similar syntaxes but if you feel more confy with Java, then good luck. Although, I would recommend C#...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angellinho The video should be longer, I`m tired of replaying it every 100 hours. Anyway .NET on Linux it`s availabe up to 2.0 3.0 using Wine or MONO Project. I left Linux a few weeks ago, but I thought 4.0 isn`t available yet.

We use plenty of .net 4.0 features in ConquerAI (i.e. concurrency). Functions on linux fine.

Quote:

Originally Posted by InfamousNoone We use plenty of .net 4.0 features in ConquerAI (i.e. concurrency). Functions on linux fine.

Now depends which kind of application. If it`s a program that have to run in background instead of a console application which can`t run on linux without using the services system from mono.

Stop bashing Java. We all know Java is the best language out there with all its fancy stuff.

And to answer the original question, the only other major conquer resource that im aware of is Fang's wiki, which i believe contains some structures.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Korvacs And to answer the original question, the only other major conquer resource that im aware of is Fang's wiki, which i believe contains some structures.

Whom is all incorrect. ;)

Quote:

Originally Posted by I don't have a username Whom is all incorrect. ;)

O_o I'd be SHOCKED if fang's wiki contained completely incorrect packet structures.

Just a quick look shows that there's only a very few packet structures on there and they look correct to me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by pro4never O_o I'd be SHOCKED if fang's wiki contained completely incorrect packet structures. Just a quick look shows that there's only a very few packet structures on there and they look correct to me.

The ones for 4??? can't remember exactly whatever. They have incorrect offsets as I used them as referenced and ended up rewriting them myself and use Justins source as reference.

Quote:

Originally Posted by I don't have a username The ones for 4??? can't remember exactly whatever. They have incorrect offsets as I used them as referenced and ended up rewriting them myself and use Justins source as reference.

If you say so. They were all from my 4274 project. I'd make a thread to get more packet structures for the wiki, but Jack already has one. He just needs to host it somewhere. As far as a java source goes... you might see one this summer.