[NEW] ZeroN 9D - The Ultimate 9D Server

ETA is september dude ...

They told us so many times, yet ur 2 lazy to do some searching -.-"

News regarding ZeroN 9D.

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Quote:

Originally Posted by witek1992 News regarding ZeroN 9D. [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Please just post it without us having to register on a separate website.....

hi people. i am intrigued. with the amount of data available and different versions concurrently in operation. i am interested to see. if a new server is available. From the client boot we all know what scripts are required to be read from the client side .The mass record sets set against each i.e item(releating to the item type and item code) which we all by know has nested hiarechial structures beneath the top level item code. my question is have you guys managed to pull the record structures apart and decide what relates to what. i do have the source code , but ofc c++ is not my area.All i see is poor development skills and lack of commenting functions and procedures.These guys really banged this source together with a lack of help in a ide environment. it does work though ofc. i would love to see the compilation errors on each build they achieved. makes me think how many devs actually had the final writing into the final source.

multi functions and sub routines was nice to see. but if this was done in a multi task environment. why was there a lack of comments within this environment. i am supprised if this source actually came from indy21. It shocks me to see the total lack of error trapping in this source which we have all seen.

but then again i suppose, we can highlight at the end of the day the code does work. but for a multi national company hiring coders to deliver a robust system.This does shock me. they must be damn confident with how they actually presented the final product.

i expected to see error trapping on all functions and procedures .the client is not 100% by far on all versions. Infact the error trapping stinks.Err codes was not properly highlighted in eod.log.
for a developers perspective , i would expect to see a more indepth message if a crash occured. The old error trapping methods with .err was not really enough . Programmers will know its not always the proc/func that screwed up . It was the call that caused it. so the actual bug was not correctly located. anyway good night all





ok i said my opinion. just my view guys

regards
mardu

Quote:

Originally Posted by madmerlin3009 hi people. i am intrigued. with the amount of data available and different versions concurrently in operation. i am interested to see. if a new server is available. From the client boot we all know what scripts are required to be read from the client side .The mass record sets set against each i.e item(releating to the item type and item code) which we all by know has nested hiarechial structures beneath the top level item code. my question is have you guys managed to pull the record structures apart and decide what relates to what. i do have the source code , but ofc c++ is not my area.All i see is poor development skills and lack of commenting functions and procedures.These guys really banged this source together with a lack of help in a ide environment. it does work though ofc. i would love to see the compilation errors on each build they achieved. makes me think how many devs actually had the final writing into the final source. multi functions and sub routines was nice to see. but if this was done in a multi task environment. why was there a lack of comments within this environment. i am supprised if this source actually came from indy21. It shocks me to see the total lack of error trapping in this source which we have all seen. but then again i suppose, we can highlight at the end of the day the code does work. but for a multi national company hiring coders to deliver a robust system.This does shock me. they must be damn confident with how they actually presented the final product. i expected to see error trapping on all functions and procedures .the client is not 100% by far on all versions. Infact the error trapping stinks.Err codes was not properly highlighted in eod.log. for a developers perspective , i would expect to see a more indepth message if a crash occured. The old error trapping methods with .err was not really enough . Programmers will know its not always the proc/func that screwed up . It was the call that caused it. so the actual bug was not correctly located. anyway good night all ok i said my opinion. just my view guys regards mardu

If you are speaking about the source that got leaked in 2012 by Thai, dont count on it since it have been tampered with, although there is still some useful hashes for adjusting the game, nothing else is really useful, the most damaged areas are the Engine, Game Client code, and GS is mia ... and many many things.

i have lots of incomplete source versions and they cotradict with each other at some point, sadly no one want to share the very complete original source, at least i can make cool stuff out of this game i can literally change it ... but meh 9D community as always.

Quote:

Originally Posted by soly95 If you are speaking about the source that got leaked in 2012 by Thai, dont count on it since it have been tampered with, although there is still some useful hashes for adjusting the game, nothing else is really useful, the most damaged areas are the Engine, Game Client code, and GS is mia ... and many many things. i have lots of incomplete source versions and they cotradict with each other at some point, sadly no one want to share the very complete original source, at least i can make cool stuff out of this game i can literally change it ... but meh 9D community as always.

Just as you said. Lately I tried to compile one of older version of source, but it's missing a lot of stuff. There are many strange functions done there. It'd be better to rewrite stuff from scratch.

@[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] - Even if you know basics of C++, you won't be able to read the code so easily. They did many #define's that are mostly removed or modified. Also, as you know, sources are old, and even structures won't match - there youngest version I had my eyes on was from 2009? Remember that they implemented many things so far - weapon skills, traps, party buffs, etc. - they aren't implemented in old sources or they got modified. And that code is written on C-based functions, so it doesn't help much. And, as you see, I'm talking only about skills, and they were the things than changed the least since the beginning. Even for me, that code was really annoying to read, so I gave up on doing stuff related to source.

I'm into coding and reverse engineering stuff, but on the other side, I'm too lazy to develop anything. I just helped Bogdy once or twice, that's why I got counted in as a staff. Actually, I'm helping rather than developing - that's Bogdy's job.

It's better to get hands on original tools.

Also, about building errors - I had 10k errors at very first build after implementing all required libraries. After I fixed those 10k, I've got another 30k. That's the reason I'd rather rewrite code in clean C++ rather than using that shit.

Mardu, can you mind your business ? You don't really expect us to tell you anything after you clearly stated that you have a superior version, do you ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by bog18dy Mardu, can you mind your business ? You don't really expect us to tell you anything after you clearly stated that you have a superior version, do you ?

Sorry was just curious. good luck with all the hard work you guys have put into this project.

Quote:

Originally Posted by madmerlin3009 Sorry was just curious. good luck with all the hard work you guys have put into this project.

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

ZeroN 9D Changelog/Progress Log:

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Posts a progression log which you cannot view unless you register. Registration and rest of any page to generate takes ages and if you register, it takes days to get the account activated. You also messed up the permissions "No permission for node 1" at least give registered users permission to view the HOME channel.

Channel Management -> Channel Permissions

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Zeron9D - Only private server to have custom NPC shops

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Quote:

Originally Posted by bog18dy Zeron9D - Only private server to have custom NPC shops [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Can you elaborate?

As others have requested, why cant you make a section of your forum open for announcements?

Quote:

Originally Posted by eddwood Can you elaborate? As others have requested, why cant you make a section of your forum open for announcements?

Even RedFox failed with adding items to shops: [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

We actually can add a lot of custom items to shops. What about couriers for 10k each? :rolleyes: as you can see on the screenshot, we were able to buy items with no "Failed." information. Too lazy to record video proof, though, so you can trust me. :D

I still prefer my newest weapon.

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

We added News section to be viewable for unregistered users.