I will be fairly honest.Quote:
lol
Not really,my friend. :)
as a botter:Quote:
I am 100% positive you don't need thousands of samples to understand that if it is a bot or a human playing.
As a bot developer easy to understand and easy to prove :rolleyes:Quote:
as a botter:
They don't need to prove it.Quote:
as a botter:
Right , BP has all rights to do whatever in every account , We are not the owners of the account we use , The real owner is BP :( , but the another thing about detections: NO PROBLEM EVERY UPDATE WE CAN CHANGE BOT BEHAVIOR AND NOW THE DETECTION IS HARD.Quote:
They don't need to prove it.
BP has the right to close whatever account they wish whenever they wish.
It is only a matter about detection and the fact that there is no interest in removing all the bots from the game.
This is where a non-dynamic neural network comes into play.Quote:
Right , BP has all rights to do whatever in every account , We are not the owners of the account we use , The real owner is BP :( , but the another thing about detections: NO PROBLEM EVERY UPDATE WE CAN CHANGE BOT BEHAVIOR AND NOW THE DETECTION IS HARD.
lol ,if a player change his behavior this means is a bot? i don't think so!Quote:
This is where a non-dynamic neural network comes into play.
Bots change behavior? Fine. We can still predict that a real player wouldn't be changing his behavior (unlike bot users).
EDIT:
Just to make sure you understand: It doesn't matter how the neural-network learns that a player is a player and a bot is a bot. The thing is: It will learn.