[Guide] Private Server Source Downloads

02/29/2012 12:11 Korvacs#76
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kiyono View Post
That's why it isn't stickied yet, waiting for pro, he probably has his reasons for not sickying it.
Trial mod or full mod, you can both make these decisions you know.
02/29/2012 12:29 Kiyono#77
Quote:
Originally Posted by Korvacs View Post
Trial mod or full mod, you can both make these decisions you know.
I could swear I pressed the sticky button a while ago =/
Anyway, it's actually stickied this time.
03/27/2012 06:21 ImFlamedCOD#78
Anyone remember a source posted by Ivan* I believe it was? It could have been ImmuneOne, It's not the Exodus Binaries project.It was a side project by one of them. If anyone has any in-site on this project please private message me. I remember something useful from that source that I could use in a project I am working on thanks.

Note: I know it was posted in some one else's topic, as a like base source or something.
03/27/2012 09:55 Kiyono#79
Quote:
Originally Posted by ImFlamedCOD View Post
Anyone remember a source posted by Ivan* I believe it was? It could have been ImmuneOne, It's not the Exodus Binaries project.It was a side project by one of them. If anyone has any in-site on this project please private message me. I remember something useful from that source that I could use in a project I am working on thanks.

Note: I know it was posted in some one else's topic, as a like base source or something.
Any idea as to which patch that source was made for? Cause I randomly downloaded almost every source but I only labeled it with patch numbers.
03/30/2012 10:23 ImFlamedCOD#80
5017 is possiable? I also think it could be a 5065 ish. Its a unique one, only one realase.
03/30/2012 15:24 Kiyono#81
Seems I don't have it then, guess there's no choice but to search through every post he ever made =/
03/30/2012 15:41 ×Holo#82
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kiyono View Post
Seems I don't have it then, guess there's no choice but to search through every post he ever made =/
I could help, who was the owner of the post?
03/30/2012 20:38 ImFlamedCOD#83
I beleive it was Ian* , or maybe Nullable one of them been searching for awhile.I rember it was posted as a response to a thread like here's a base source. If that helps
03/30/2012 21:48 hunterman01#84
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Was doing some research for that 5017 source(cause i have nothing to do at work) and came across this, Another source that could be added to that section
03/31/2012 01:20 Kiyono#85
Quote:
Originally Posted by ImFlamedCOD View Post
I beleive it was Ian* , or maybe Nullable one of them been searching for awhile.I rember it was posted as a response to a thread like here's a base source. If that helps
I quickly looked through every post Ian* and Nullable ever made and nothing, could have missed it due the speed though but I doubt that.
03/31/2012 01:42 hunterman01#86
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kiyono View Post
I quickly looked through every post Ian* and Nullable ever made and nothing, could have missed it due the speed though but I doubt that.
Same thing got nothing
03/31/2012 03:17 ImFlamedCOD#87
I also did a sweep and found nothing thats why i posted was hoping some one remembered. * sigh * Ill just run more through searches myself.
03/31/2012 04:26 morphinum#88
Can I correct you at some point if you don't mind Fang?
I've read your thread out (boredom killing me meanwhile) and I found out you provided some wrong information. Nothing big but you just assigned some features to a wrong patch version. Look at "Conquer New Dynasty, Patch 5065". It's not the patch 5065 where the Confiscator (the new redeem system for items) was implemented, nor all the infos that you stated there. It's 5066. 5065 was still working with the old composition system, old PK system, no login details (during game interface intializing process). You might want to edit your thread when you have some spare time. Very good and detalied post though, +1.
04/04/2012 12:21 marek_1#89
What Encryption is it using for database passwords? it has 32 chars but I dont think it's md5 is it?
04/05/2012 20:50 Kiyono#90
Quote:
Originally Posted by marek_1 View Post
What Encryption is it using for database passwords? it has 32 chars but I dont think it's md5 is it?
I think it was RC5 with some TQ stuff meshed in? Not sure but regardless the code for decryption floats around on these forums/various sources anyway.