[Poll] Emulators ?

03/05/2011 20:55 LastThief#46
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kazuya¹ View Post
haha if your a girl, then im mickey mouse. ^^ homo.
and im spider man XD
03/05/2011 22:14 LastThief#47
Quote:
Originally Posted by <KickAss> View Post
Dude let me kick your ass and pax's ass and all VB.NET coder's ass's

i will upload a photo from my crack [notice] no one tell me to release it couze pax sell's it so if i released my crack that's mean stealing other guy's work :)
do you even know what messagebox.show("Message") stands for ?
i bet you don't even know what this function

Public Sub set_config(ByVal my_c As String)
Dim con_col As String() = my_c.Split(";"c)
cmdsrvrtxt.Text = con_col(0)
cmddbtxt.Text = con_col(1)
cmdtxtusr.Text = con_col(2)
cmdpsstxt.Text = con_col(3)
mconfig.server = cmdsrvrtxt.Text
mconfig.catalog = cmddbtxt.Text
mconfig.user = cmdtxtusr.Text
mconfig.password = cmdpsstxt.Text
TextBox1.Text = con_col(4)
TextBox2.Text = con_col(5)
TextBox3.Text = con_col(6)
TextBox4.Text = con_col(7)
End Sub


btw what program language you used on the cracking html ?
03/06/2011 00:55 nubcandy#48
this thread is ridiculous, THERE ARE ONLY 4 MADAFAKIN POSTS ANSWERING THE STARTER'S QUESTION,ALL THE OTHER POSTS ARE FLAMING
why cant you just fuckin ignore thEsE retards who just wanna start flame war............................................... ..............................
03/06/2011 01:00 kevin_owner#49
Quote:
Originally Posted by fukmaka View Post
this thread is ridiculous, THERE ARE ONLY 4 MADAFAKIN POSTS ANSWERING THE STARTER'S QUESTION,ALL THE OTHER POSTS ARE FLAMING
why cant you just fuckin ignore thEsE retards who just wanna start flame war............................................... ..............................
You aren't answering his question either. btw did you count my 2 posts into those 4 cause I answerd his question 2 times:)
03/06/2011 02:03 SoSuNooP#50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maciupka View Post
So why you are cracking his work dumbass? Because of peoples like you he didnt finished yet, and maybe he will never finish if everyone will still cracking. Who will make emulator then ? maybe you ?. He is only person who are really working on emulator many years alredy. Where is jmerlin ? he crack pax emulator and disappear like everyone. You are pathetic. You care only about how many thanks you will get from peoples.

Moreover you dont even know for what pax are using this email thats really epic ...
he has his source code stolen from lyzerks work moron... stfu if u dont know any shit about coding.

and for the question, yes it can, there are emulators for other games which supports more than 2.5k.


PS: i bet this guy doesnt even know that a source code is...



EDIT:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maciupka View Post
Like i said before i was expected too much from you , your brain its dead.






You dont know a shit about pax source except this wat jmerlin said before he fucked up everyone and abandon his own project after crack pax. If you belife pax emulator its sremu only because he was coding sremu long time ago your brain its a dead space.I think you are just a simple TARD who want destroy pax because you are simple jelous.

I will defend pax because he is a good man and he is making something not like you guys "wanna be pro coders" who are talking about languages to chose when you are coding a simple calculator.
i cant even post a facepalm which is great enough to express this fucking über fail...

1: pax didnt code any shit in dsremu, it was made by lyzerk and jmerlin, pax only added some features to it.
2: if you're claiming that we are so-called ''wanna be pro coders'', why dont you post a work of yourself instead of defending someone else?
3: thanks doesnt a SHIT here
4: pax never made a FULLY functional emulator. the most advanced emulator was arcane which lyzerk gave to a lucky few. i havent been keeping up with the emulators lately but as far as ive heard, srevolution has source codes from lyzerks arcane.
5: stop writing the same bullshit crap like how much is your iq, u have no brain uu its ded
6: you seriously need to learn english, if i hadnt lived in england, i wouldnt have understood a word. im suprised, alot of these guys understood your 'fail' (unless if theyre not from an english speaking country ofc :D)
7: the list goes on and on and on................................................ ..
03/06/2011 05:46 Murgen#51
If someone wants a fully working emulator, they need to start different, and pick a client. Someone should fully emulate the 70-cap isro client and finish it. If people could focus on one of the early versions of sro im sure they would finish, and then add on the next cap, and the next etc. and why diss someones work? A programming language is a language, one of the best World of Warcraft Emulators is made in C# and it holds over 2k people, but sro I suggest C++. I would love a 70 cap emulator
03/06/2011 11:34 kevin_owner#52
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murgen View Post
If someone wants a fully working emulator, they need to start different, and pick a client. Someone should fully emulate the 70-cap isro client and finish it. If people could focus on one of the early versions of sro im sure they would finish, and then add on the next cap, and the next etc. and why diss someones work? A programming language is a language, one of the best World of Warcraft Emulators is made in C# and it holds over 2k people, but sro I suggest C++. I would love a 70 cap emulator
Could that even be possible if you don't have the packets from the server? You can get them from the client and try the latest one and hope they didn't change. Btw the idea is very nice to start with an early version without all those extra things and then start adding new caps but that might be a big mess if you're not using some kind of library which you already created or how some people like to call it an "engine" or framework
03/06/2011 11:40 vorosmihaly#53
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin_owner View Post
Could that even be possible if you don't have the packets from the server? You can get them from the client and try the latest one and hope they didn't change. Btw the idea is very nice to start with an early version without all those extra things and then start adding new caps but that might be a big mess if you're not using some kind of library which you already created or how some people like to call it an "engine" or framework
the idea is nice,but there are a lots of changes in packets,in the most of them just a byte/word,but in some of them it might be more than just a word/byte..
03/06/2011 11:48 OwN147☆#54
flamewar

Round 3215104450448996314448966215
03/06/2011 11:52 HaGsTeR#55
Quote:
Originally Posted by OwN147 View Post
flamewar

Round 3215104450448996314448966215
"Ding!"

Hey! you suck!
03/06/2011 11:53 kevin_owner#56
Quote:
Originally Posted by vorosmihaly View Post
the idea is nice,but there are a lots of changes in packets,in the most of them just a byte/word,but in some of them it might be more than just a word/byte..
Yep and mabye some other change to allow bigger values or something like that. Anyway if you want to make your emulator compatible with the latest version you could just not add guilds unions fw and all those kinds of stuff and focuss at 1 thing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by OwN147 View Post
flamewar

Round 3215104450448996314448966215
You also just spamed so you're just as bad as i am:)
03/06/2011 12:08 half113#57
Best hope for 2k player's supporting emu come's from xsens team atm.Pax's emu will never make even near to srevolution's emu quality.+
if you look at the video than ivy spawn's actually attacked the ivy attacker's witch even srevolution's mob's still don't do they just walk away
03/06/2011 13:46 SoSuNooP#58
esro was awesome, but in the end, they failed like the many 2342342342341125123 others, but as far as i know, npcdoom is still continuing to develop it
03/06/2011 17:07 Nezekan#59
fakc mater esro fails! ESRO SUCKKKKKKKK

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
03/06/2011 17:36 dimkacool#60
Probably Maciupka is licking pax's ass to get a discount :awesome: