Fecurity

Quote:

Originally Posted by zebleer Systemcheats hides when they get detected. Deleting evidence on their website falls under "hiding" behavior..? Also I thought you said you used them since recently not since game came out? They've been DT on the latest COD/BR specifically a few times You'd be better off just figuring out the EO FPS issue since you already use their spoofer As for your comment about PO I never once recommended you use PO. I was arguing with you about Fecurity & Systemcheats & telling you to go to EO. I would not recommend PO to you because your post history tells me you like rage cheats. I have improved the performance of PO a lot recently so it performs more like an internal but it still wouldn't match your rage needs. Use EO Your comment about feature detections isn't relevant to me because SC and Fecurity both have had general detections of their COD cheats And being a reseller who either themselves or through another reseller uses bot spamming of other p2c chats to grow their user base

Quote:

Originally Posted by PBMoose Hi guys, does anyone know the website of Fecurity or the dc？

Quote:

Originally Posted by mememachinez I personally use systemcheats and have been fine all of MW2... and have not seen any mass ban reports on their website at all... so idk what u are on about... 2ndly i use EO spoofer that is it.. i have used their cheat but it killed my fps so i stopped... + i have tried PO before on the old warzone and it wasnt really my thing, did not perform well for me since it was external. Feature detections are not really the same as full cheat detections... If the provider has a feature marked as unsafe / use at your own risk then its the user knows not to use it if they want to stay safe... glow and unlock all is marked as unsafe / use at your own risk in fecurity...

Quote:

Originally Posted by mememachinez I have had an active premium package sub with systemcheats for the last few years.... i have used them on MW2 since around when the game launched... when i used another cheat i used them on other alt accounts (when i used EO or FEC). I also used them on previous cods such as vanguard, cold war and the old warzone, then even a few years ago in 2018 i used them for a month or two on black ops 4.... I am going off of my experience with them, not just "i have heard"... and my experience with them over the years has been really good...so i am going to continue using them.

Quote:

Originally Posted by eradicatekikes I agree Feature Detections shouldn’t count as the cheat itself being detected

Quote:

Originally Posted by zebleer Your post history indicates that you began using Systemcheats at the start of the MW3 beta, not at the start of MW2. It also indicates you used EO (cheat) for MW2 & you never mentioned Fecurity until now either I can't really have any form of "debate" with you if you are going to be dishonest with me to try & validate your points I guess we will have to agree to disagree on this one Bans are bans. People tend to use every feature that any given cheat has to offer them & it's our responsibility as developers to serve our users features we believe are safe Developers should be held accountable for adding risky features to their cheats but instead the users like you give them a free pass by claiming it's not a real detection I'm not saying that providers with feature detections should be deleted I'm just saying they should have to list the detection as a detection. That's what I mean by "held accountable" nothing severe

Quote:

Originally Posted by zebleer Bans are bans. People tend to use every feature that any given cheat has to offer them & it's our responsibility as developers to serve our users features we believe are safe Developers should be held accountable for adding risky features to their cheats but instead the users like you give them a free pass by claiming it's not a real detection

Quote:

Originally Posted by zebleer Bans are bans. People tend to use every feature that any given cheat has to offer them & it's our responsibility as developers to serve our users features we believe are safe Developers should be held accountable for adding risky features to their cheats but instead the users like you give them a free pass by claiming it's not a real detection I'm not saying that providers with feature detections should be deleted I'm just saying they should have to list the detection as a detection. That's what I mean by "held accountable" nothing severe

Quote:

Originally Posted by TransPrincess I disagree with that statement. If it was a proper detection then everyone would be getting banned, not the select few who choose to use a risky / rage feature which results in server-side detection. However, Should developers be accountable in the way that its marked more obvious that its a 'risky' feature for their clients? For sure. Take a look at the CS scene for example. Almost every cheat makes you force click a button in their menu to even reveal the 'risky' and possibly 'detected' features, so you can't even use them or even see them unless you click some button to reveal the "untrusted" features. The same can be done for COD but I believe the only one who does this is Interwebz from what I heard. EngineOwning does have their **risky** notice on the menu, but from what I understand you can still accidentally click this.