COtobo poll #2 - Limit maximal number of clients

4 clients ;)

i voted 4 clients, u guys r saying who cares bout the economy, but if it crashes it affects u, would u like to sell a gem for 500k or 250k? it's just common sense. in the end u won't lose much even if it's limited. another thing is it's become pretty hard to log in, what's the point of mining if u can play? one more thing, if any1 who tries to crack cotobo, is disrespecting choco, we wouldn't want that would we?

i'd say 4-6clients max... seeing people useing litraly all 16 clients to mine is taking the mick

i run 2 clients mineing, 2 in TG, and one playing all useing the bot, mainly because i find is useful for all of them, but i could cut down abit..
edit: opps forgot my 6th is normaly a market guy ^^ i could run two more miners or osmething,, but to lazy to make any more accounts, 4 is good enuf though

i think you should rpboly go agist the vote on this, most people like on CO just want everything, CO might do alot of crap thing but afew of the thing they do almost make sence O_o

Quote:

Originally posted by skankinred+Feb 20 2006, 06:04--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (skankinred @ Feb 20 2006, 06:04)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--devilsiao@Feb 19 2006, 08:42 voted no. because if peoples cares so much about markets economy and such. they shouldnt be using any Copather and Cotobo.?right? simple enough. play it the "right way" dont use marcro or anything... why bother to visit EVP?.. Just my reason for voting no. cheers

I 2nd that. Either play "the EPVP way" or play the "normal" way.
I also use cotobo on other chars even when not mining. It has many useful features besides mining.


I have feeling a majority of the people who are voting 2,4,8 are just doing it because their computer limits them to this many. They don't want anybody else to run more, so they wouldn't have a greater advantage over them. [/b][/quote]
agreed.

besides the point is mining sucks due to pkers and this bot prevents pkers from making you lose gems....

so its an aid... i know of some guy who opened like tons of miners even way before this bot...

i don't see any difference in making it LIMITED...

otherwise it would kinda be screwed just like TQ limiting us with 2 cilents....

just my 2 cents no offense to anyone i hope.....

EDIT: like that skankinred said... people do use cotobo for hunting & finding blue mouse... and also there's a cap on max client in one of the posts made by someone in this forum.....

so personally i think if you going to use the bot then do not comment on things like screwing the economy etc. coz if u use the bot you're a part of those who do that...

thanks.

I don't see a point to limiting it, the economy isnt gonna flux much... you still have mine pkers, and even if you aren't killed your still disconnected, I've gotten disc like 10 times in 30 mins... so it just means the mine pkers go round more, and either we kill them or get dc'ed....

Oh, and I voted no.....

Well, looks like it's going to be no limit.

The arguments have fully convinced me and the option "No" also slightly won the vote.

Quote:

Originally posted by chocoman4k@Mar 1 2006, 21:57 Well, looks like it's going to be no limit. The arguments have fully convinced me and the option "No" also slightly won the vote.

but would recommand NOT adding reconnect features..... thanks =)

Quote:

Originally posted by chocoman4k@Mar 1 2006, 21:57 Well, looks like it's going to be no limit. The arguments have fully convinced me and the option "No" also slightly won the vote.

i'm just curious, if u were to vote what would it be?

51% No, but the poll is abit subjective because there is three choices for "Yes" and only one choice for "No"

gib es auf 4 miner.. das viel besser weil der server nicht dauernd voll ist und die gems wertvoll bleiben und der markt nicht überflutet wird :bandit:

I say No because I can put on a mximum of 5 clients but I dont care. Anyway if the prices on gems go down its good they are way 2 high rite now. But there are so many pkers. Its a pain in the ass 2 get up from my bed every 5 minutes and see that all my miners have dced. I have mined a few supers, like 10 refs and about 100 normals and its ok. But Choco great job on this thing. Im seriously proud to have a person like you giving us this stuff that you took time 2 make urself and sharing it with us. I have become pretty rich mining and its really nice. Again i think no ther should be no limit and that you should make a re-connect feature because of the reason stated above. Aight thnkx for this whole Bot!

Quote:

Originally posted by nickel+Mar 1 2006, 17:15--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (nickel @ Mar 1 2006, 17:15)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--chocoman4k@Mar 1 2006, 21:57 Well, looks like it's going to be no limit. The arguments have fully convinced me and the option "No" also slightly won the vote.

but would recommand NOT adding reconnect features..... thanks =) [/b][/quote]
I doubt a reconnect will be added anytime soon. He has already said he won't add one till all the bugs are worked out; and until cotobo can stop freezing so frequently on reconnects, a reconnecter won't do you any good anyways.

no ecause gems going lower is a good thing, what are guys stupid or something you think the economy of the market relys on gems only psshhh w/e, anyways if gets get cheap then do blue mouse quest with them lol i make more money buy using normal nix gems to do blue mouse quest then selling the nix gem now. anyways point is gems being lower is better for everyone conquer will not die because of this and besides most of the people that want it limited cant load that many anyways, place ur specs and hope ur telling the truth if you think otherwise... and ill just keep using the 24 miners i have :)

I voted "No." also...

We're all part of a "hacking" or "cheating" community... If you're gonna download a program, why not use it to it's max... If you didn't want the prices to drop in the market in the first place, you would've never even came here or downloaded a single program.

Too late, but I also voted no ;)

Since it's too late I won't bother typign out my reasons :/